Journal of Oral Implantology April 2014 - (Page 195)
CASE REPORT
The Custom Endosteal Implant: Histology and Case
Report of a Retrieved Maxillary Custom OsseousIntegrated Implant Nine Years in Service
William D. Nordquist, BS, DMD, MS1*
David J. Krutchkoff, DMD, MS2
The Custom Endosteal Implant (CEI) is a custom-cast osseo-integrated implant that has evolved to replace the
''old'' fibro-integrated subperiosteal variant. This newly developed implant achieves osseous integration by
utilizing a hydroxyapatite (HA) coating, and a specialized grafting technique that produces much improved
success rates relative to its fibro-integrated subperiosteal predecessor. This case reported here represents a
maxillary CEI implant that was placed and in functional service for 9 years before being retrieved and processed
for histologic examination subsequent to the patient's demise. In addition, due to infection that occurred
shortly after placement, an early provisional procedure with fluoridated HA was also performed. Histologic
analysis of the postmortem specimen revealed a fully integrated new bone formation intimately surrounding
the previously dehisced implant strut. The latter had previously been decontaminated and grafted with a thin
layer of fluorapatite (FA) material. Results including histologic analysis confirmed complete osseo-integration of
the implant following successful FA graft revision.
Key Words: Custom Endosteal Implant, subperiosteal implant, osseous integration, fluoridated HA, revision
surgery, dental implant
INTRODUCTION
T
he Custom Endosteal Implant (CEI) is a
custom cast, osseo-integrated implant
that has been developed to replace the
now obsolete fibro-integrated subperiosteal device. This implant achieves
osseous integration by utilizing a hydroxyapatite
(HA) coating, and a specialized grafting technique
that produces much improved success rates relative
to its fibro-integrated counterpart. The purpose of
this article was to document histologic features of a
clinically placed CEI implant and surrounding tissues
after 9 years of functional service. Specifically, we
endeavored to demonstrate unequivocally that the
1
Private practice, Implant Dentistry, San Diego, Calif.
Oral Pathology, University of Connecticut School of Dental
Medicine, Farmington, Conn.
* Corresponding author e-mail: wnordquist@yahoo.com
DOI: 10.1563/AAID-JOI-D-11-00218
2
union of the HA-coated, FA-grafted implant with
surrounding bone was complete and osseous in
nature, and, therefore supports and validates the
use of the CEI implant procedure in clinical practice.
Historical evolution of the subperiosteal implant
to the CEI
Subperiosteal dental implants have undergone a
long process of continuous evolution since they
were first put to clinical use. Historically, the
technique was first advocated and employed by
Dahl,1 and was continually developed by many
others as documented by later studies.2-9 Perhaps
even more important were the subsequent contributions of Linkow, which includes modernized
designs of subperiosteal implants with regard to
supportive structures for the maxilla and the
tripodal design for the mandible.10-13 Other American dentists (Bodine, Mentag, Mena, Riviera, and
Journal of Oral Implantology
195
Table of Contents for the Digital Edition of Journal of Oral Implantology April 2014
Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT): Answering the Call for JOI’s Endorsement
Photoelastic Analysis of Stress Distribution With Different Implant Systems
Influence of Abutment Screw Design and Surface Coating on the Bending Flexural Strength of the Implant Set
Comparison of Implant-Abutment Interface Misfits After Casting and Soldering Procedures
Evaluation of Accuracy of Casts of Multiple Internal Connection Implant Prosthesis Obtained From Different Impression Materials and Techniques: An In Vitro Study
The Effect of Different Implant-Abutment Connections on Screw Joint Stability
Effects of pH and Elevated Glucose Levels on the Electrochemical Behavior of Dental Implants
Finite Element Analysis of Provisional Structures of Implant-Supported Complete Prostheses
Saliva Versus Peri-implant Inflammation: Quantification of IL-1b in Partially and Totally Edentulous Patients
Heat Generated During Seating of Dental Implant Fixtures
An Alternative Approach for Augmenting the Anterior Maxilla Using Autogenous Free Gingival Bone Graft for Implant Retained Prosthesis
Nasopalatine Duct Cyst, a Delayed Complication to Successful Dental Implant Placement: Diagnosis and Surgical Management
The Custom Endosteal Implant: Histology and Case Report of a Retrieved Maxillary Custom Osseous-Integrated Implant Nine Years in Service
Occlusal Concepts Application in Resolving Implant Prosthetic Failure: Case Report
Three-Year Follow-Up of a Single Immediate Implant Placed in an Infected Area: A New Approach for Harvesting Autogenous Symphysis Graft
Use of Stress Analysis Methods to Evaluate the Biomechanics of Oral Rehabilitation With Implants
Journal of Oral Implantology April 2014
http://www.brightcopy.net/allen/orim/Glossary
https://www.nxtbook.com/allen/orim/40-6
https://www.nxtbook.com/allen/orim/40-5
https://www.nxtbook.com/allen/orim/40-4
https://www.nxtbook.com/allen/orim/40-s1
https://www.nxtbook.com/allen/orim/40-3
https://www.nxtbook.com/allen/orim/40-2
https://www.nxtbook.com/allen/orim/40-1
https://www.nxtbook.com/allen/orim/39-6
https://www.nxtbook.com/allen/orim/39-5
https://www.nxtbook.com/allen/orim/39-4
https://www.nxtbook.com/allen/orim/39-3
https://www.nxtbook.com/allen/orim/39-s1
https://www.nxtbook.com/allen/orim/39-2
https://www.nxtbook.com/allen/orim/39-1
https://www.nxtbook.com/allen/orim/38-6
https://www.nxtbook.com/allen/orim/38-5
https://www.nxtbook.com/allen/orim/38-s1
https://www.nxtbook.com/allen/orim/38-4
https://www.nxtbook.com/allen/orim/38-3
https://www.nxtbook.com/allen/orim/38-2
https://www.nxtbook.com/allen/orim/38-1
https://www.nxtbookmedia.com