Journal of Healthcare Management - March/April 2014 - (Page 134)
J o u r n al
of
H ealt H care M anage Ment 59:2 M arcH /a pril 2014
9 did not consent to participate in the
study, leaving 828 surveys. Eighty surveys were blank, leaving 748 possible
surveys for analysis. Nineteen surveys
were less than 80% completed and were
eliminated. We then eliminated those
surveys completed by individuals whose
role types were ineligible for inclusion,
leaving 700 total usable surveys.
To determine the number of potential subjects who would be eligible to
join the study, we applied several filters
to the approximately 14,000 team
members from the study organization's human resources database. We
used specific job codes for roles, hospitals, and unit locations that would
meet inclusion. Applying those criteria, the number of eligible IP and ED
team members was 6,664. Our sample
represented approximately a 10.5%
response rate based on this assessment.
Of those, 591 subjects were from the IP
setting and 109 were from the ED. Data
on EHR usage by subjects from the ED
were analyzed separately from IP findings because of the differences in pace,
priorities, and patient flow. Because
fewer types of providers are actively
involved in ED patient care, providers
were grouped as prescribers (MDs, nurse
practitioners, or physician assistants),
nurses, and ancillary staff in this subanalysis. Table 1 summarizes the total
sample in the study.
Sample Characteristics
The sample of 591 subjects from the
IP setting consisted primarily of
women (78.3%) and individuals who
had achieved a baccalaureate degree
or higher education (75.8%). The
average age of the participants was
41.49 years; the youngest respondent
was 19, and the oldest was 71. The
sample also reflected an average tenure
of 14.6 years in participants' role and
8.59 years' longevity with the organization. The primary role represented in the
sample was bedside nurses (40%), followed by ancillary clinical roles (19%).
Study Question Results
Which parts of the EHR do clinical
practitioners access to view
documented information?
An analysis of IP results was performed
in 50 specific areas of the EHR to
determine which areas are most often
reviewed during patient care. We found
that Diagnostic Results was the most
frequently accessed (89%) by all providers, with 96% of advanced clinical nurse
professionals accessing this screen often
or frequently. Physicians Orders was also
heavily used to review information, with
86% of respondents often or frequently
accessing this portion of the record.
Two forms of provider core documents
heavily accessed were History and Physical by a Physician (84%) and Physician
Progress Notes (83%), while the Nursing Care documents and Patient Work
List were less frequently viewed by all
subjects; only 63% of respondents indicated that they view this area regularly,
of whom 90% of bedside nurses and
7% of prescribers access this area of the
EHR for review. Table 2 summarizes the
parts of the EHR that subjects reportedly
review often in their role.
In contrast, many other areas of the
EHR were less frequently accessed for
review. Numerous nursing and ancillary
core documents were rarely reviewed,
134
Table of Contents for the Digital Edition of Journal of Healthcare Management - March/April 2014
Journal of Healthcare Management - March/April 2014
Contents
Interview With Marna P. Borgstrom, FACHE, President and Chief Executive Officer, Yale New Haven Health System, and Chief Executive Officer, Yale-New Haven Hospital, Connecticut
Specialties: Missing in Our Healthcare Reform Strategies?
Costs and Benefits of Transforming Primary Care Practices: A Qualitative Study of North Carolina’s Improving Performance in Practice
Governing Board, C-suite, and Clinical Management Perceptions of Quality and Safety Structures, Processes, and Priorities in U.S. Hospitals
Use of Electronic Health Record Documentation by Healthcare Workers in an Acute Care Hospital System
Why Hospital Improvement Efforts Fail: A View From the Front Line
Journal of Healthcare Management - March/April 2014
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/ache/jhm_20161112
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/ache/jhm_20160910
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/ache/jhm_20160708
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/ache/jhm_20160506
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/ache/jhm_20160304
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/ache/jhm_20160102
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/ache/jhm_20151112
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/ache/jhm_20150910
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/ache/jhm_20150708
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/ache/jhm_20150506
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/ache/jhm_20150304
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/ache/jhm_20150102
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/ache/jhm_20141112
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/ache/jhm_20140910
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/ache/jhm_20140708
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/ache/jhm_20140506
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/ache/jhm_20140304
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/ache/jhm_20140102
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/ache/jhm_20131112
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/ache/jhm_20130910
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/ache/jhm_20130708
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/ache/jhm_20130506
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/ache/jhm_20130304
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/ache/jhm_20130102
https://www.nxtbookmedia.com