Journal of Healthcare Management - March/April 2014 - (Page 97)
c osts
and
B enefits
of
(Leatherman et al., 2003; Reiter, Kilpatrick, Greene, Lohr, & Leatherman, 2007).
To overcome their reluctance, primary
care practices need information about
the costs and benefits of transformation
to assess the potential burden of, the
value in, and the organization's capacity
for engaging in this type of change. Likewise, payers and policy makers need this
information to design reimbursement
strategies and set priorities that support
and sustain quality improvement efforts.
As part of a larger study to assess the
process of transformation in primary
care practices participating in NC IPIP
(Donahue et al., 2013), we sought to
identify the practice-level costs and benefits associated with transformation.
t ransfor Ming p riMary c are p ractices
in each of four domains: patient registries, planned care templates, protocols, and patient self-management
support tools. Practices were classified
as improved if they achieved a rating
of 4 on at least two domains at any
point within the first year. Clinical
measures included diabetes (percentage of sampled diabetes patients with
hemoglobin A1C < 9%, blood pressure
< 130/80 mmHg, LDL cholesterol levels
< 100 mg/dL, yearly eye examinations,
and annual nephropathy screening)
and asthma (percentage of sampled
asthma patients with asthma control
assessment, controller medicine use,
influenza vaccination, and a bundled
measure including all three). Using the
first 12 months of clinical data, we ran
a separate repeated measures logistic
regression with random intercept and
slope for each clinical measure in each
practice. Also for each practice, we
averaged the standardized slopes (time
trends) for the different clinical measures. Practices with a mean greater than
1 were classified as improved.
Second, we engaged practice coaches
to help us identify practices that had
staff members with sufficient involvement to provide the historical and/
or current context of practices' experience with NC IPIP. As noted in Table
1, we approached and interviewed four
practices that improved in both metrics, three practices that improved in
practice change scores but not clinical
process/outcome scores, three practices
that improved in clinical process/outcome scores but not practice change
scores, and two practices that showed no
improvement in either metric.
METHODS
We used a comparative case study design
(Yin, 2008) to describe the personnel
and nonpersonnel costs and benefits
involved in transformational change.
Study Setting and Sample
Eligible practices were those participating in NC IPIP that had data on the
following: (1) practice coaches' ratings
of change implementation (practice
change score) and (2) process and
outcome measures (clinical outcomes).
Of the 100 participating practices, we
identified 76 that had at least one year's
worth of data. From these, we purposely
selected 12 practices using a two-step
process. First, we categorized practices
as either improved or not improved on
each of the measures (Table 1). Practice
change scores were assigned by practice
coaches using a scale of 0 (no implementation) to 5 (full implementation)
97
Table of Contents for the Digital Edition of Journal of Healthcare Management - March/April 2014
Journal of Healthcare Management - March/April 2014
Contents
Interview With Marna P. Borgstrom, FACHE, President and Chief Executive Officer, Yale New Haven Health System, and Chief Executive Officer, Yale-New Haven Hospital, Connecticut
Specialties: Missing in Our Healthcare Reform Strategies?
Costs and Benefits of Transforming Primary Care Practices: A Qualitative Study of North Carolina’s Improving Performance in Practice
Governing Board, C-suite, and Clinical Management Perceptions of Quality and Safety Structures, Processes, and Priorities in U.S. Hospitals
Use of Electronic Health Record Documentation by Healthcare Workers in an Acute Care Hospital System
Why Hospital Improvement Efforts Fail: A View From the Front Line
Journal of Healthcare Management - March/April 2014
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/ache/jhm_20161112
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/ache/jhm_20160910
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/ache/jhm_20160708
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/ache/jhm_20160506
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/ache/jhm_20160304
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/ache/jhm_20160102
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/ache/jhm_20151112
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/ache/jhm_20150910
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/ache/jhm_20150708
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/ache/jhm_20150506
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/ache/jhm_20150304
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/ache/jhm_20150102
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/ache/jhm_20141112
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/ache/jhm_20140910
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/ache/jhm_20140708
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/ache/jhm_20140506
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/ache/jhm_20140304
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/ache/jhm_20140102
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/ache/jhm_20131112
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/ache/jhm_20130910
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/ache/jhm_20130708
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/ache/jhm_20130506
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/ache/jhm_20130304
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/ache/jhm_20130102
https://www.nxtbookmedia.com