Journal of Healthcare Management - May/June 2014 - (Page 192)
J o u r n al
of
H ealt H care M anage Ment 59:3 M ay /J une 2014
example, we employed experienced
interviewers using an interview guide,
audiorecorded and transcribed interview
data, coded data by multiple individuals
using a common codebook, and collected multiple sources of data to
enhance the validity of findings.
CONCLUSION
The statewide UNC VTB program is
intended to improve the quality of
cancer care in North Carolina by providing multidisciplinary consultative
assistance to community-based providers. However, it has faced several implementation challenges, including
lower-than-desired utilization of the
program by community-based clinicians. This evaluation revealed that
those who have presented at the VTB
found the experience useful and believe
there is value in the service, while those
who have not participated cite substantial barriers (e.g., timing, lack of reimbursement). Future research on similar
VTB programs is needed to address
barriers to participation and to identify
structures and processes that increase
the impact of the VTB on care processes
and, ultimately, patient outcomes.
Identifying appropriate measures of
impact on treatment decisions, as well
as on outcomes for patients whose cases
are presented at the VTB, will be an
important aspect of future research.
Some possible outcomes include patient
satisfaction with choice of treatment
regimen(s); patient perception of
informed medical decision making;
receipt of guideline-concordant treatment; patient quality of life; and clinical
outcomes, such as morbidity, mortality,
and recurrence. Consistent with the
movement toward patient-centeredoutcomes research, soliciting patient
input (e.g., via interviews) about outcomes most important to them could be
a useful next step.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This project was funded by Health-e-NC, an
initiative of the University Cancer Research
Fund at the University of North Carolina at
Chapel Hill. Dr. Christopher M. Shea was
supported by the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, National Institutes
of Health (NIH) (KL2TR001109)
(UL1TR001111) (PI: Runge). Dr. Stephanie B.
Wheeler was supported by an Agency for
Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ)
Mentored Clinical Scientists Comparative
Effectiveness Development Award
(1K12HS019468) (PI: Weinberger). The
content is solely the responsibility of the
authors and does not necessarily represent the
official views of the NIH or AHRQ.
REFERENCES
American College of Surgeons (ACoS). (2013).
Cancer programs. Retrieved from http://
www.facs.org/cancerprogram/.
Blayney, D. W. (2013). Tumor boards (team
huddles) aren't enough to reach the goal.
Journal of the National Cancer Institute,
105(2), 82-84. doi:10.1093/jnci/djs523
Bowen, D. J., Kreuter, M., Spring, B., CoftaWoerpel, L., Linnan, L., Weiner, D., . . .,
Fernandez, M. (2009). How we design
feasibility studies. American Journal of
Preventive Medicine, 36, 452-457.
Cohen, P., Tan, A. L., & Penman, A. (2009).
The multidisciplinary tumor conference
in gynecologic oncology-Does it alter
management? International Journal of
Gynecological Cancer, 19(9), 1470-1472.
doi:10.1111/IGC.0b013e3181bf82df
Commission on Cancer (CoC). (2012). Cancer
program standards 2012: Ensuring patientcentered care. Chicago, IL: American
College of Surgeons.
Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry &
research design: Choosing among five
approaches (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA:
Sage.
192
http://www.facs.org/cancerprogram/
http://www.facs.org/cancerprogram/
Table of Contents for the Digital Edition of Journal of Healthcare Management - May/June 2014
Journal of Healthcare Management - May/June 2014
Contents
Interview With Christopher D. Van Gorder, FACHE, President and CEO of Scripps Health
Successful Strategic Planning for a Reformed Delivery System
You, Inc.
Assessing the Feasibility of a Virtual Tumor Board Program: A Case Study
Physician Clinical Alignment and Integration: A Community–Academic Hospital Approach
Employer-Based Coverage and Medical Travel Options: Lessons for Healthcare Managers
Composite Model for Profiling Physicians Across Domains of Care
Journal of Healthcare Management - May/June 2014
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/ache/jhm_20161112
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/ache/jhm_20160910
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/ache/jhm_20160708
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/ache/jhm_20160506
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/ache/jhm_20160304
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/ache/jhm_20160102
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/ache/jhm_20151112
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/ache/jhm_20150910
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/ache/jhm_20150708
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/ache/jhm_20150506
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/ache/jhm_20150304
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/ache/jhm_20150102
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/ache/jhm_20141112
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/ache/jhm_20140910
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/ache/jhm_20140708
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/ache/jhm_20140506
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/ache/jhm_20140304
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/ache/jhm_20140102
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/ache/jhm_20131112
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/ache/jhm_20130910
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/ache/jhm_20130708
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/ache/jhm_20130506
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/ache/jhm_20130304
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/ache/jhm_20130102
https://www.nxtbookmedia.com