Journal of Healthcare Management - May/June 2014 - (Page 235)
M odel
for
p rof IlI ng p Hys IcIans a cross d o MaIns
methodology and valued the feedback
as a fair assessment of their performance. The previous reward program
ranked physicians on a small set of P4P
measures and organizational incentives
and lacked consistency across the
members of the network. Additionally,
the previous program did not measure
all of the physicians in the managed care
network. Health Clinic continued to use
the case study profiling methodology in
2010 (with 2009 data) and 2011 (with
2010 data), at which time the funding
was no longer available to support the
rewards program.
CONCLUSION
In this article, we present a physician
profiling method designed to produce
reliable results, and we demonstrate its
application at Health Clinic. The hierarchical composite model allows a diverse
set of measures (i.e., process, outcome,
structure, efficiency, and satisfaction) to
be used at the individual or group level,
thereby enabling broad profiling of
individual clinicians. The model enables
combining measures with disparate
sample sizes, levels of difficulty, and
variation, including measures that were
individually unreliable for differentiating physician performance. The model is
flexible and can accommodate change
in future years, is transparent in terms of
measurement, aligns with the organizational quality agenda, and is perceived
as fair by targeted physician groups,
thereby supporting key elements needed
for useful physician profiling (Garnick et
al., 1994).
We also provide a foundation for
additional work. While the resulting
model at Health Clinic met design
of
c are
expectations for reliability and purpose,
future studies should examine case-mix
adjustments and practice functionalities
to improve validity. In addition, initiatives to create shared pools of transparent information for physician
performance across insurers would
provide more complete and accurate
data and therefore improve the ability to
profile physician performance. Finally,
the model could be part of a participative weighting process in which clinics
and physicians could choose their own
improvement foci, increasing the
relevance of the resulting model for
participating physicians.
REFERENCES
Adams, J. L. (2009). The reliability of provider
profiling: A tutorial. Santa Monica, CA:
RAND Corporation.
Adams, J. L., Mehrotra, A., Thomas, J. W., &
McGlynn, E. A. (2010). Physician cost
profiling-Reliability and risk of misclassification. New England Journal of Medicine,
362, 1014-1021.
Berwick, D. M. (2009). Measuring physicians'
quality and performance: Adrift on Lake
Wobegon. Journal of the American Medical
Association, 302, 2485-2486.
Curtright, J. W., Stolp-Smith, S. C., & Edell, E.
S. (2000). Strategic performance management: Development of a performance
measurement system at the Mayo Clinic.
Journal of Healthcare Management, 45(1),
58-68.
Draper, D. A. (2009, June). Physician performance measurement: A key to higher
quality and lower cost growth or a lost
opportunity? Center for Studying Health
System Change. Commentary 3. Retrieved
from http://www.hschange.com/CONTENT
/1064/1064.pdf
Garnick, D. W., Fowles, J., Lawthers, A. G.,
Weiner, J. P., Parente, S. T., & Palmer, R. H.
(1994). Focus on quality: Profiling
physicians' practice patterns. Journal of
Ambulatory Care Management, 17, 44-75.
Hofer, T. P., Hayward, R. A., Greenfield, S.,
Wagner, E. H., Kaplan, S. H., & Manning,
235
http://www.hschange.com/CONTENT/1064/1064.pdf
Table of Contents for the Digital Edition of Journal of Healthcare Management - May/June 2014
Journal of Healthcare Management - May/June 2014
Contents
Interview With Christopher D. Van Gorder, FACHE, President and CEO of Scripps Health
Successful Strategic Planning for a Reformed Delivery System
You, Inc.
Assessing the Feasibility of a Virtual Tumor Board Program: A Case Study
Physician Clinical Alignment and Integration: A Community–Academic Hospital Approach
Employer-Based Coverage and Medical Travel Options: Lessons for Healthcare Managers
Composite Model for Profiling Physicians Across Domains of Care
Journal of Healthcare Management - May/June 2014
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/ache/jhm_20161112
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/ache/jhm_20160910
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/ache/jhm_20160708
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/ache/jhm_20160506
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/ache/jhm_20160304
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/ache/jhm_20160102
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/ache/jhm_20151112
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/ache/jhm_20150910
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/ache/jhm_20150708
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/ache/jhm_20150506
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/ache/jhm_20150304
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/ache/jhm_20150102
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/ache/jhm_20141112
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/ache/jhm_20140910
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/ache/jhm_20140708
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/ache/jhm_20140506
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/ache/jhm_20140304
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/ache/jhm_20140102
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/ache/jhm_20131112
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/ache/jhm_20130910
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/ache/jhm_20130708
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/ache/jhm_20130506
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/ache/jhm_20130304
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/ache/jhm_20130102
https://www.nxtbookmedia.com