Managed Healthcare Executive - October 2008 - (Page 20)

Industry 2009 State of the IT SYSTEM INTEGRATION proving the quality of healthcare delivery and not on compensating for administrative ine ciencies,” he says. “Employers and individuals should rightly ask, ‘If you don’t even have your own houses in order and running e ciently, why should I allow you stewardship over my healthcare dollars?’” Dr. Frisse believes organizations must at least achieve the essential integration of their medical systems with their pharmacy systems. On the bright side, he does expect to see some integration improvement over the next ve years or so, particularly in internal consolidation, but the improvement will depend on the extent to which healthcare rms are merging. “Also, I do not know if the external systems will be personal health records, regional health information organizations, or other sources, but I do know that health plans’ [data] will be only part of a broader set of information required to improve healthcare and measure quality,” he says. “That should result in a more focused set of relationships that allow individuals and their families to be empowered to participate more actively [in their own health].” Dr. Schmuland says in the next ve to 10 years, the challenge will be less about integrating existing systems and more about digitizing and improving the collaborative interactions among employees, consumers, providers, information, and processes that can improve health while reducing the per-capita cost of healthcare. “This won’t be easy and will require a new generation of commodity, Internetbased technologies that make it easier and more natural for people and teams to communicate, share insights, and work together across the workplace, the home, and multiple company boundaries,” he says. “And, of course, these new technologies will need to be integrated with existing core systems, service channels, and partners.” Organizations that move beyond core system integration will be poised to take share by virtue of having exibility to exploit new opportunities and adapt to complex and changing business demands. MHE EALTHCARE delivery remains somewhat “ITchallenged,” relative to industries such as banking, retail and communications. But with more than half of respondents saying they are fully or mostly integrated internally (53.9%) and externally (55%, either with outside entities or among their own family of companies), the question becomes: Is the glass half full or half empty? While some may conclude that the integration glass is half full, organizations need to realize the need for integrating structured information and unstructured information, experts say. “The problem is that only about 20% of the business information that people and teams need to act on is the structured information that’s available in core systems, applications, and databases,” says MHE Editorial Advisor Dennis Schmuland, MD, FAAFP, health plan industry solutions director for Microsoft Corp. “This is the information that integration projects seek to unlock. “The other 80% of information that people and teams need is unstructured— usually spread across the organization, hidden in local hard drives, le shares, intranet sites, laptops, e-mail systems and in people’s minds,” he continues. “What’s worrisome is that unstructured data is growing much faster than structured, essentially doubling every three months. Yet most health and care-delivery organizations actually believe that the structured-information glass is the only one that needs to be lled. While the structured-information glass is half full, the unstructured information/expertise glass is empty.” Mark Frisse, MD, director of the Regional Informatics programs at the Vanderbilt Center for Better Health, is also disappointed with the overall results. “Although I can understand the complexity of these systems—particularly with changing reimbursement rules and the slow path of software integration—as a consumer, I would like to be reassured that plans with my funds are taking every e ort to devote as much of these funds as possible to im20 OCTOBER 2008 H Internal Integration 45.2% 33.1% 8.7% External Integration 30.5% 29.6% 24.5% Mostly integrated; a few disparate systems Mostly disparate systems; some integration Full internal integration Integrated within own family of companies Do not integrate outside own company Integrate with other entities or information exchanges Source: Managed Healthcare Executive Reader Survey, 2008

Table of Contents Feed for the Digital Edition of Managed Healthcare Executive - October 2008

Managed Healthcare Executive - October 2008 For Your Benefit Editorial Advisors Contents News Analysis State Report Politics &�Policy Healthcare Reform Trends in 2009 Cost Control Strategies Predicted Premium Increase Top Challenges in 2009 IT System Integration Technology Innovation Disease Management Health Management Pharmacy Best Practices Technology Desktop Resource Ad/Edit Index Managed Care Outlook Statement of Ownership

Managed Healthcare Executive - October 2008

For optimal viewing of this digital publication, please enable JavaScript and then refresh the page. If you would like to try to load the digital publication without using Flash Player detection, please click here.