Monitor on Psychology - February 2012 - (Page 48)

I n 2003, Sabine Parish — a poor, low-performing school district in rural Louisiana — hired Dorman Jackson as superintendent because of his reputation for raising test scores. He instituted a remedial-learning program to catch and treat learning problems early, and soon, students’ academic performance started to rise. But at a certain point, that trajectory halted. “We discovered we had carried our kids about as far as we could,” says Jackson. After speaking with the district’s student assessment and support services department, he learned more about why: Many of these students faced significant personal roadblocks that prevented them from doing well in school, including overworked or absent parents, emotional problems, and drug and alcohol abuse. That’s when Jackson’s staff suggested that the school work with psychologists Howard Adelman, PhD, and Linda Taylor, PhD, who co-direct the University of California, Los Angeles, School Mental Health Project and the federally funded National Center for Mental Health in Schools. They had developed a model called “the enabling component” — also referred to as “learning supports” by schools, districts and other entities that implement it. It targets the psychosocial and educational barriers to student success. The model does that in two ways. First, it aims to consolidate and coordinate student and learning supports — the counseling services, school prevention and intervention programs, and community resources that tend to be fragmented and uncoordinated at many schools. Second, the model offers interventions to address barriers to learning and teaching, such as bringing support staff directly into the classroom to work with kids, and making better connections with and use of community resources to help struggling children and their families. The approach appears to be working in Sabine Parish: From 2007 and 2010, graduation rates rose from 73 percent to 81.2 percent. In addition, of the state’s 60 districts, Sabine has gone from 37th in 2003 to 14th this year in academic performance. Jackson doesn’t think the school could have gotten there without the psychological and social support the enabling component model provided. “I have appreciated gaining the knowledge that when a kid is having a problem in their family or with themselves,” Jackson says, “they’re not going to be successful unless you fix that problem.” Now, the UCLA team is taking its work nationwide, holding forums for educational and policy leaders in 13 states and helping implement the program at the state, district and school levels. How the model works Adelman and Taylor’s enabling component model was developed after 30 years of research and observation in their lab school at UCLA and in the Los Angeles public schools. Through their work, Adelman and Taylor observed two trends. For one, they saw that pulling at-risk students out of class to be counseled, punished or suspended for aggressive behaviors or bullying interfered with their peer relationships and academic progress. The psychologists discovered that keeping these children in stimulating, supportive classrooms helped them to stop acting out, learn and share their own unique gifts with other kids. Second, Adelman and Taylor noticed an enormous redundancy in schools’ mental health and social services. When they developed a program to prevent school dropout, for instance, “we soon realized that at some school sites, we were one of 15 similar programs that were trying to address risky behaviors,” Taylor says. As they continued to see these phenomena play out in school and after school, it became clear the system needed an overhaul, Adelman says. “We thought there had to be a way to bring all of this together — not just to coordinate programs, but to really develop a major intervention framework,” he says. Their “enabling component” encourages school action in six areas: 1. Making innovative changes to classroom instruction. That includes bringing support personnel into the classroom, rather than taking children out of class when their behavior or inattention may have gotten out of control. It also calls for revamping teaching and intervention methods to help teachers handle problems more easily and effectively. 2. Supporting children through transitions. Not only are children moving back and forth from school to home and from one school level to the next, many are also coping with family disruptions, such as a divorce. 3. Connecting families to schools and school activities. This includes offering basic parenting classes, fostering more meetings between parents and teachers and involving families in homework projects, field trips and other activities. 4. Maximizing use of community resources. Developing and maintaining strong connections with community resources can greatly enhance schools’ capacity to support these youngsters. Entities to tap include public and private agencies, colleges and universities, businesses, artists and cultural institutions, faithbased organizations and volunteer groups. 5. Reorganizing crisis assistance and prevention. Schools need systems that can respond quickly and effectively in the wake of any crisis, whether it is a natural disaster, a terrorist attack or student acting in a way that endangers others. Schools must also create safe and caring learning environments that deal preemptively with disruptive and potentially dangerous behavior such as bullying and harassment. 6. Improving links to external mental health and behavioral services. When internal resources aren’t enough, schools should be able to refer students and families to mental health and financial assistance services in a timely fashion. The framework also emphasizes the need to build students’ sense of competence, self-determination and connections with others, rather than punishing them for “bad” behavior, says Taylor. “It’s a new way of thinking about how to deal with atM o n i t o r o n p s y c h o l o g y • F e b ru a ry 2 0 1 2 48

Table of Contents for the Digital Edition of Monitor on Psychology - February 2012

Monitor on Psychology - February 2012
Letters
President’s column
Contents
From the CEO
APA files two briefs in support of same-sex couples
New registry seeks to understand addiction recovery through ‘crowdsourcing’
APA launches a database of tests and measures
Watch for new member benefit: “APA Access”
Apply now for APA’s Advanced Training Institutes
PsycTHERAPY, APA’s new database, brings therapy demos to life
In Brief
APA scientists help guide tobacco regulation
A-mazing research
‘A machine for jumping to conclusions’
Judicial Notebook
Random Sample
Righting the imbalance
The beginnings of mental illness
Science Directions
Improving disorder classification, worldwide
Protesting proposed changes to the DSM
Interventions for at-risk students
Harnessing the wisdom of the ages
Anti-bullying efforts ramp up
Hostile hallways
R U friends 4 real?
Support for teachers
Speaking of Education
Record keeping for practitioners
Going green
At the intersection of law and psychology
Division Spotlight
Grants help solve society’s problems
Personalities

Monitor on Psychology - February 2012