ASHRAE Journal - August 2008 - (Page 50) 3.50 18 Total Compressor Volume Flow Rate (cfm/ton) Anhydrous Ammonia (R-717) Twin Screw Compressor External Oil Cooling Intermediate Pressure = 30 psig (16.5°F sat) Condensing Pressure = 150 psig (85°F sat) Single-Stage Compression and Two-Stage Liquid Expansion Anhydrous Ammonia (R-717) Twin Screw Compressor External Oil Cooling Intermediate Pressure = 30 psig (16.5°F sat) Condensing Pressure = 150 psig (85°F sat) Full-Load Compressor Efficiency (hp/ton) Single-Stage Compression 3.25 and Liquid Expansion 3.00 2.75 2.50 2.25 2.00 1.75 1.50 1.25 – 55 Two-Stage Compression and Liquid Expansion 16 14 12 Two-Stage Compression and Liquid Expansion 10 Single-Stage Compression and Two-Stage Liquid Expansion 8 6 Single-Stage Compression and Liquid Expansion – 45 – 35 – 25 – 15 Saturated Suction Temperature (°F) –5 4 – 55 – 45 – 35 – 25 – 15 Saturated Suction Temperature (°F) –5 Figure 2: Refrigeration system efficiency as a function of lowtemperature suction requirements. Figure 3: Compressor displacement per ton as a function of lowtemperature suction requirements. 3.50 (– 32°C), respectively. The condensing condition is fixed at 85°F (29°C) saturated which corresponds to 150 psig (10.3 bar). The symbol indicates the theoretical optimum intermediate pressure for a two-stage compression system. Notice that in this case, the actual optimum (i.e., lowest hp/ton) occurs at intermediate pressures slightly higher than the theoretical optimum. Also note that the optimum is fairly broad, that is, the intermediate pressure does not have a large effect on overall system efficiency. To illustrate that point, the results shown in Figure 4 reveal that any intermediate pressure between 27 psig to 50 psig (1.9 bar to 3.4 bar) yields system efficiencies within 2% of the optimum. In reality, most refrigeration systems do not have only low temperature loads. Nearly all plants will have refrigeration loads that demand higher temperature refrigerant: cooler spaces, bulk product storage tanks, production air-conditioning, postpasteurization cooling, etc. The presence of these higher temperature loads will not significantly degrade the efficiency of meeting the low-stage loads due to the relatively broad optimum of the intermediate pressure. This is excellent news because the high-stage load temperature requirements can now dictate the intermediate pressure without compromising the efficiency of meeting the low-stage loads. As a Function of Condensing Pressure 3.25 Full-Load Compressor Efficiency (hp/ton) 3.00 Single-Stage Compression and Liquid Expansion 2.75 Single-Stage Compression and Two-Stage Liquid Expansion 2.50 2.25 Two-Stage Compression and Liquid Expansion 2.00 1.75 1.50 1.25 10 Theoretical Optimum Intermediate Pressure Anhydrous Ammonia (R-717) Twin Screw Compressor External Oil Cooling Suction Pressure = 9 in. Hg (– 40°F sat) Condensing Pressure = 150 psig (85°F sat) 15 20 25 30 35 40 Intermediate Pressure (psig) 45 50 Figure 4: Refrigeration system efficiency (– 40°F [– 40°C] sat) as a function of intermediate pressure. Conclusions The last factor considered is the condensing pressure. Figure 6 shows the effect of saturated condensing temperature (pressure) on the efficiencies of the three systems for a fixed intermediate pressure of 30 psig (2 bar) (16.5°F saturated [– 8.6°C]) and – 25°F (– 32°C) saturated suction (1.2 psig [0.08 bar]). As the condensing pressure is reduced, the compression ratio decreases and at approximately 64°F (18°C) saturated (100 psig [6.9 bar]) the efficiency of the two-stage system is the same as for a single-stage compression system with two stages of liquid expansion. 50 ASHRAE Journal The use of two stages of compression is common in low-temperature industrial refrigeration systems. The efficiency benefit of a two-stage system increases as the temperature requirements are lowered and is weakly dependent on the intermediate pressure. The decision on whether to configure the system for multiple-stages of compression is one that should weigh both the advantages and disadvantages at the suction pressures required by the loads. As a general rule, two-stage compression systems should always be considered when loads demand low suction temperatures, particularly those lower than –25°F (–32°C) (1.2 psig [0.08 bar]). Regardless of the number of stages of compression, configuring the liquid side for two-stages of expansion will nearly always inashrae.org August 2008 http://ashrae.org
Table of Contents Feed for the Digital Edition of ASHRAE Journal - August 2008 ASHRAE Journal - August 2008 Contents Commentary Industry News Letters Meetings and Shows Maintain to Sustain—Delivering ASHRAE’s Sustainability Promise Ultraviolet Germicidal Irradiation: Current Best Practices Improving Humidity Control With Energy Recovery Ventilation Single- or Two-Stage Compression Data Center Cooling: Using Wet-Bulb Economizers Building Sciences InfoCenter Practical Pointers Products Emerging Technologies Washington Report People Special Products Classified Advertising Advertising Index ASHRAE Journal - August 2008 ASHRAE Journal - August 2008 - ASHRAE Journal - August 2008 (Page Cover1) ASHRAE Journal - August 2008 - ASHRAE Journal - August 2008 (Page Cover2) ASHRAE Journal - August 2008 - ASHRAE Journal - August 2008 (Page 1) ASHRAE Journal - August 2008 - ASHRAE Journal - August 2008 (Page 2) ASHRAE Journal - August 2008 - Contents (Page 3) ASHRAE Journal - August 2008 - Contents (Page 4) ASHRAE Journal - August 2008 - Commentary (Page 5) ASHRAE Journal - August 2008 - Industry News (Page 6) ASHRAE Journal - August 2008 - Industry News (Page 7) ASHRAE Journal - August 2008 - Industry News (Page 8) ASHRAE Journal - August 2008 - Industry News (Page 9) ASHRAE Journal - August 2008 - Industry News (Page 10) ASHRAE Journal - August 2008 - Industry News (Page 11) ASHRAE Journal - August 2008 - Industry News (Page 12) ASHRAE Journal - August 2008 - Industry News (Page 13) ASHRAE Journal - August 2008 - Industry News (Page 14) ASHRAE Journal - August 2008 - Industry News (Page 15) ASHRAE Journal - August 2008 - Industry News (Page 16) ASHRAE Journal - August 2008 - Industry News (Page BA1) ASHRAE Journal - August 2008 - Industry News (Page BA2) ASHRAE Journal - August 2008 - Letters (Page 17) ASHRAE Journal - August 2008 - Meetings and Shows (Page 18) ASHRAE Journal - August 2008 - Meetings and Shows (Page 19) ASHRAE Journal - August 2008 - Maintain to Sustain—Delivering ASHRAE’s Sustainability Promise (Page 20) ASHRAE Journal - August 2008 - Maintain to Sustain—Delivering ASHRAE’s Sustainability Promise (Page 21) ASHRAE Journal - August 2008 - Maintain to Sustain—Delivering ASHRAE’s Sustainability Promise (Page 22) ASHRAE Journal - August 2008 - Maintain to Sustain—Delivering ASHRAE’s Sustainability Promise (Page 23) ASHRAE Journal - August 2008 - Maintain to Sustain—Delivering ASHRAE’s Sustainability Promise (Page 24) ASHRAE Journal - August 2008 - Maintain to Sustain—Delivering ASHRAE’s Sustainability Promise (Page 25) ASHRAE Journal - August 2008 - Maintain to Sustain—Delivering ASHRAE’s Sustainability Promise (Page 26) ASHRAE Journal - August 2008 - Maintain to Sustain—Delivering ASHRAE’s Sustainability Promise (Page 27) ASHRAE Journal - August 2008 - Ultraviolet Germicidal Irradiation: Current Best Practices (Page 28) ASHRAE Journal - August 2008 - Ultraviolet Germicidal Irradiation: Current Best Practices (Page 29) ASHRAE Journal - August 2008 - Ultraviolet Germicidal Irradiation: Current Best Practices (Page 30) ASHRAE Journal - August 2008 - Ultraviolet Germicidal Irradiation: Current Best Practices (Page 31) ASHRAE Journal - August 2008 - Ultraviolet Germicidal Irradiation: Current Best Practices (Page 32) ASHRAE Journal - August 2008 - Ultraviolet Germicidal Irradiation: Current Best Practices (Page 33) ASHRAE Journal - August 2008 - Ultraviolet Germicidal Irradiation: Current Best Practices (Page 34) ASHRAE Journal - August 2008 - Ultraviolet Germicidal Irradiation: Current Best Practices (Page 35) ASHRAE Journal - August 2008 - Ultraviolet Germicidal Irradiation: Current Best Practices (Page 36) ASHRAE Journal - August 2008 - Ultraviolet Germicidal Irradiation: Current Best Practices (Page 37) ASHRAE Journal - August 2008 - Improving Humidity Control With Energy Recovery Ventilation (Page 38) ASHRAE Journal - August 2008 - Improving Humidity Control With Energy Recovery Ventilation (Page 39) ASHRAE Journal - August 2008 - Improving Humidity Control With Energy Recovery Ventilation (Page 40) ASHRAE Journal - August 2008 - Improving Humidity Control With Energy Recovery Ventilation (Page 41) ASHRAE Journal - August 2008 - Improving Humidity Control With Energy Recovery Ventilation (Page 42) ASHRAE Journal - August 2008 - Improving Humidity Control With Energy Recovery Ventilation (Page 43) ASHRAE Journal - August 2008 - Improving Humidity Control With Energy Recovery Ventilation (Page 44) ASHRAE Journal - August 2008 - Improving Humidity Control With Energy Recovery Ventilation (Page 45) ASHRAE Journal - August 2008 - Single- or Two-Stage Compression (Page 46) ASHRAE Journal - August 2008 - Single- or Two-Stage Compression (Page 47) ASHRAE Journal - August 2008 - Single- or Two-Stage Compression (Page 48) ASHRAE Journal - August 2008 - Single- or Two-Stage Compression (Page 49) ASHRAE Journal - August 2008 - Single- or Two-Stage Compression (Page 50) ASHRAE Journal - August 2008 - Single- or Two-Stage Compression (Page 51) ASHRAE Journal - August 2008 - Data Center Cooling: Using Wet-Bulb Economizers (Page 52) ASHRAE Journal - August 2008 - Data Center Cooling: Using Wet-Bulb Economizers (Page 53) ASHRAE Journal - August 2008 - Data Center Cooling: Using Wet-Bulb Economizers (Page 54) ASHRAE Journal - August 2008 - Data Center Cooling: Using Wet-Bulb Economizers (Page 55) ASHRAE Journal - August 2008 - Data Center Cooling: Using Wet-Bulb Economizers (Page 56) ASHRAE Journal - August 2008 - Data Center Cooling: Using Wet-Bulb Economizers (Page ACP1) ASHRAE Journal - August 2008 - Data Center Cooling: Using Wet-Bulb Economizers (Page ACP2) ASHRAE Journal - August 2008 - Data Center Cooling: Using Wet-Bulb Economizers (Page ACP3) ASHRAE Journal - August 2008 - Data Center Cooling: Using Wet-Bulb Economizers (Page ACP4) ASHRAE Journal - August 2008 - Data Center Cooling: Using Wet-Bulb Economizers (Page ACP5) ASHRAE Journal - August 2008 - Data Center Cooling: Using Wet-Bulb Economizers (Page ACP6) ASHRAE Journal - August 2008 - Data Center Cooling: Using Wet-Bulb Economizers (Page 57) ASHRAE Journal - August 2008 - Data Center Cooling: Using Wet-Bulb Economizers (Page 58) ASHRAE Journal - August 2008 - Data Center Cooling: Using Wet-Bulb Economizers (Page 59) ASHRAE Journal - August 2008 - Building Sciences (Page 60) ASHRAE Journal - August 2008 - Building Sciences (Page 61) ASHRAE Journal - August 2008 - Building Sciences (Page 62) ASHRAE Journal - August 2008 - Building Sciences (Page 63) ASHRAE Journal - August 2008 - Building Sciences (Page 64) ASHRAE Journal - August 2008 - Building Sciences (Page 65) ASHRAE Journal - August 2008 - InfoCenter (Page 66) ASHRAE Journal - August 2008 - InfoCenter (Page 67) ASHRAE Journal - August 2008 - InfoCenter (Page 68) ASHRAE Journal - August 2008 - InfoCenter (Page 69) ASHRAE Journal - August 2008 - InfoCenter (Page 70) ASHRAE Journal - August 2008 - InfoCenter (Page 71) ASHRAE Journal - August 2008 - Practical Pointers (Page 72) ASHRAE Journal - August 2008 - Practical Pointers (Page 73) ASHRAE Journal - August 2008 - Products (Page 74) ASHRAE Journal - August 2008 - Products (Page 75) ASHRAE Journal - August 2008 - Emerging Technologies (Page 76) ASHRAE Journal - August 2008 - Emerging Technologies (Page 77) ASHRAE Journal - August 2008 - Emerging Technologies (Page 78) ASHRAE Journal - August 2008 - Emerging Technologies (Page 79) ASHRAE Journal - August 2008 - Washington Report (Page 80) ASHRAE Journal - August 2008 - People (Page 81) ASHRAE Journal - August 2008 - Special Products (Page 82) ASHRAE Journal - August 2008 - Special Products (Page 83) ASHRAE Journal - August 2008 - Special Products (Page 84) ASHRAE Journal - August 2008 - Classified Advertising (Page 85) ASHRAE Journal - August 2008 - Classified Advertising (Page 86) ASHRAE Journal - August 2008 - Classified Advertising (Page 87) ASHRAE Journal - August 2008 - Advertising Index (Page 88) ASHRAE Journal - August 2008 - Advertising Index (Page Cover3) ASHRAE Journal - August 2008 - Advertising Index (Page Cover4)
For optimal viewing of this digital publication, please enable JavaScript and then refresh the page. If you would like to try to load the digital publication without using Flash Player detection, please click here.