High Performing Buildings - Winter 2008 - (Page 12) that saves 66.6% of the Standard 90.1 budget building requirement. The cooler water also increases the period of time when the heat exchanger is efficient to run. The normal selection is for a three-degree approach, but the heat exchanger was selected to provide 100 tons of capacity when operating at a onedegree approach to entering condenser water. With the combination of the cooling tower and the heat exchanger, chilled water leaving the heat exchanger can be cooled to within four degrees of ambient wet bulb temperature whereas the normal selection parameters would only approach within eight degrees of LESSONS LEARNED Several things have become apparent during construction and operation. Air Leaks It is more difficult to seal a building against air leaks than it is to agree to a leakage target with a contractor. Much effort was put into sealing the building, but actual leakage significantly exceeds the target. The target was an ambitious 0.1 air changes per hour (ACH). The ventilation system was set up to deliver enough air to compensate for 0.5 ACH. Trend logs of building pressure show that actual leakage exceeds 0.5 ACH. Larger Tank A larger rainwater tank would improve the water performance of the building. While the installed tank provides 528,000 gallons per year to the gray-water system, the precipitation that falls on the roof averages 631,000 gallons per year. Unexpected Dust Roofs are dusty places when the rain begins to fall, and it is necessary to service the filters and strainers on the gray-water system more frequently than on other hydronic systems. Control Sequences Very complex control sequences require additional designer time to ensure that the end performance matches expectations. ambient wet bulb. An example of how this helps: If the return water from the building is at 66°F and the ambient wet bulb temperature is at 60°F, then the heat exchanger can reduce the 66°F return chilled water to 64°F and reduce the chiller load by a little more than 8%. The standard selection would require that the ambient wet bulb temperature be 54°F to contribute the same 8%. And, at a 54°F ambient wet bulb, the actual performance of the selected cooling tower and heat exchanger would be 33% with water sent to the chiller at 58°F. This also means that the heat exchanger can assume the entire building load at a higher ambient wet bulb temperature which results in many more hours of available cooling operation without having to operate the chiller. Chilled Water Distribution System Because HVAC energy consumption is largely the movement of heat from an area where it is not desired to an area where it is unobjectionable, considerable attention was given to the energy necessary to transport heat. For this project, the UFAD system offered the opportunity to further reduce the amount of chilled water that had to be pumped. The UFAD system uses 62°F supply air, a temperature that can be produced with relatively warm chilled water. If all dehumidification requirements are met by the dedicated ventilation units, then 54°F water will efficiently meet the sensible cooling requirements of the space and cool the air to 62°F. The amount of ventilation air varies with the amount of air required Winter 2008 to properly pressurize the building and to comply with ANSI/ASHRAE Standard 62.1-2001, Ventilation for Acceptable Indoor Air Quality. To ensure adequate dehumidification, the minimum pressurization airflow was used to calculate the required dew point of the ventilation air. That dew point, 47°F, led to 42°F as the chilled water temperature necessary to achieve the required dehumidification. The ventilation unit coils were selected to provide 47°F leaving air with chilled water rising from 42°F to 54°F. The UFAD units were selected to provide 62°F leaving air with chilled water rising from 54°F to 66°F. If the loads are equally divided between ventilation units and UFAD units, then the overall rise is from 42°F to 66°F or 24 degrees. This only requires half the water flow of a conventional 12 degree rise system, yielding a design flow of one gpm of water per ton of refrigeration and reducing pumping energy. As discussed previously, a variable Natural convection pulls cooled air off the water’s surface and up through the glass-wrapped stairs. 12 HIGH PERFORMING BUILDINGS Photo © Timothy Hursley
Table of Contents Feed for the Digital Edition of High Performing Buildings - Winter 2008 High Performance Buildings - Winter 2008 Passing On the Gift: Heifer International Headquarters Head of the Class: University of Florida’s Rinker Hall How Far Can You Go? Pearl River Tower The Proof Is Performance: How Does 4 Times Square Measure Up? Lighting the Way: Two Guilford County Schools Montreal’s Retail Example: Mountain Equipment Co-op® (MEC) High Performing Buildings - Winter 2008 High Performing Buildings - Winter 2008 - High Performance Buildings - Winter 2008 (Page Cover1) High Performing Buildings - Winter 2008 - High Performance Buildings - Winter 2008 (Page Cover2) High Performing Buildings - Winter 2008 - High Performance Buildings - Winter 2008 (Page 1) High Performing Buildings - Winter 2008 - High Performance Buildings - Winter 2008 (Page 2) High Performing Buildings - Winter 2008 - High Performance Buildings - Winter 2008 (Page 3) High Performing Buildings - Winter 2008 - Passing On the Gift: Heifer International Headquarters (Page 4) High Performing Buildings - Winter 2008 - Passing On the Gift: Heifer International Headquarters (Page 5) High Performing Buildings - Winter 2008 - Passing On the Gift: Heifer International Headquarters (Page 6) High Performing Buildings - Winter 2008 - Passing On the Gift: Heifer International Headquarters (Page 7) High Performing Buildings - Winter 2008 - Passing On the Gift: Heifer International Headquarters (Page 8) High Performing Buildings - Winter 2008 - Passing On the Gift: Heifer International Headquarters (Page 9) High Performing Buildings - Winter 2008 - Passing On the Gift: Heifer International Headquarters (Page 10) High Performing Buildings - Winter 2008 - Passing On the Gift: Heifer International Headquarters (Page 11) High Performing Buildings - Winter 2008 - Passing On the Gift: Heifer International Headquarters (Page 12) High Performing Buildings - Winter 2008 - Passing On the Gift: Heifer International Headquarters (Page 13) High Performing Buildings - Winter 2008 - Head of the Class: University of Florida’s Rinker Hall (Page 14) High Performing Buildings - Winter 2008 - Head of the Class: University of Florida’s Rinker Hall (Page 15) High Performing Buildings - Winter 2008 - Head of the Class: University of Florida’s Rinker Hall (Page 16) High Performing Buildings - Winter 2008 - Head of the Class: University of Florida’s Rinker Hall (Page 17) High Performing Buildings - Winter 2008 - Head of the Class: University of Florida’s Rinker Hall (Page 18) High Performing Buildings - Winter 2008 - Head of the Class: University of Florida’s Rinker Hall (Page 19) High Performing Buildings - Winter 2008 - Head of the Class: University of Florida’s Rinker Hall (Page 20) High Performing Buildings - Winter 2008 - Head of the Class: University of Florida’s Rinker Hall (Page 21) High Performing Buildings - Winter 2008 - How Far Can You Go? Pearl River Tower (Page 22) High Performing Buildings - Winter 2008 - How Far Can You Go? Pearl River Tower (Page 23) High Performing Buildings - Winter 2008 - How Far Can You Go? Pearl River Tower (Page 24) High Performing Buildings - Winter 2008 - How Far Can You Go? Pearl River Tower (Page 25) High Performing Buildings - Winter 2008 - How Far Can You Go? Pearl River Tower (Page 26) High Performing Buildings - Winter 2008 - How Far Can You Go? Pearl River Tower (Page 27) High Performing Buildings - Winter 2008 - How Far Can You Go? Pearl River Tower (Page 28) High Performing Buildings - Winter 2008 - How Far Can You Go? Pearl River Tower (Page 29) High Performing Buildings - Winter 2008 - The Proof Is Performance: How Does 4 Times Square Measure Up? (Page 30) High Performing Buildings - Winter 2008 - The Proof Is Performance: How Does 4 Times Square Measure Up? (Page 31) High Performing Buildings - Winter 2008 - The Proof Is Performance: How Does 4 Times Square Measure Up? (Page 32) High Performing Buildings - Winter 2008 - The Proof Is Performance: How Does 4 Times Square Measure Up? (Page 33) High Performing Buildings - Winter 2008 - The Proof Is Performance: How Does 4 Times Square Measure Up? (Page 34) High Performing Buildings - Winter 2008 - The Proof Is Performance: How Does 4 Times Square Measure Up? (Page 35) High Performing Buildings - Winter 2008 - The Proof Is Performance: How Does 4 Times Square Measure Up? (Page 36) High Performing Buildings - Winter 2008 - The Proof Is Performance: How Does 4 Times Square Measure Up? (Page 37) High Performing Buildings - Winter 2008 - Lighting the Way: Two Guilford County Schools (Page 38) High Performing Buildings - Winter 2008 - Lighting the Way: Two Guilford County Schools (Page 39) High Performing Buildings - Winter 2008 - Lighting the Way: Two Guilford County Schools (Page 40) High Performing Buildings - Winter 2008 - Lighting the Way: Two Guilford County Schools (Page 41) High Performing Buildings - Winter 2008 - Lighting the Way: Two Guilford County Schools (Page 42) High Performing Buildings - Winter 2008 - Lighting the Way: Two Guilford County Schools (Page 43) High Performing Buildings - Winter 2008 - Lighting the Way: Two Guilford County Schools (Page 44) High Performing Buildings - Winter 2008 - Lighting the Way: Two Guilford County Schools (Page 45) High Performing Buildings - Winter 2008 - Lighting the Way: Two Guilford County Schools (Page 46) High Performing Buildings - Winter 2008 - Lighting the Way: Two Guilford County Schools (Page 47) High Performing Buildings - Winter 2008 - Montreal’s Retail Example: Mountain Equipment Co-op® (MEC) (Page 48) High Performing Buildings - Winter 2008 - Montreal’s Retail Example: Mountain Equipment Co-op® (MEC) (Page 49) High Performing Buildings - Winter 2008 - Montreal’s Retail Example: Mountain Equipment Co-op® (MEC) (Page 50) High Performing Buildings - Winter 2008 - Montreal’s Retail Example: Mountain Equipment Co-op® (MEC) (Page 51) High Performing Buildings - Winter 2008 - Montreal’s Retail Example: Mountain Equipment Co-op® (MEC) (Page 52) High Performing Buildings - Winter 2008 - Montreal’s Retail Example: Mountain Equipment Co-op® (MEC) (Page 53) High Performing Buildings - Winter 2008 - Montreal’s Retail Example: Mountain Equipment Co-op® (MEC) (Page 54) High Performing Buildings - Winter 2008 - Montreal’s Retail Example: Mountain Equipment Co-op® (MEC) (Page 55) High Performing Buildings - Winter 2008 - Montreal’s Retail Example: Mountain Equipment Co-op® (MEC) (Page 56) High Performing Buildings - Winter 2008 - Montreal’s Retail Example: Mountain Equipment Co-op® (MEC) (Page Cover3) High Performing Buildings - Winter 2008 - Montreal’s Retail Example: Mountain Equipment Co-op® (MEC) (Page Cover4)
For optimal viewing of this digital publication, please enable JavaScript and then refresh the page. If you would like to try to load the digital publication without using Flash Player detection, please click here.