High Performing Buildings - Winter 2008 - (Page 21) LESSONS LEARNED Although east-west is the conventional energy-efficient orientation for a rectangular-shaped building, north-south orientation produced a number of advantages at the southerly latitude of 29° 38' 49" N. Daylight Duration The total duration of daylight hours increased more than 30% with the north-south orientation. Half of the solar day is glare-free light (west/morning and east/afternoon) and the other half of the solar day has the sun traverse from sunrise to noon and noon to sunset. Modern glazing, lighting technology, exterior wall options and interior architecture strategies used in high performance buildings have helped to solve past problems caused by glass façades. In addition, at this latitude, the noonday sun is high in the sky, varying from 37° in the winter to 83.8° in the summer. For this reason, significant reduction in the net deep daylight potential of a south-facing elevation exists. Circadian Cycle Preserving the natural or benign variability of the light while the glare, heat and ultraviolet components are moderated results in an interior space that tracks a day in nature. The variability of cloud cover, angle of the sun, and color of the sky creates a stimulating and deep-seated connection to circadian and seasonal cycles that are central to human biological function. Energy Savings Because the number one consumer of electricity in the workplace and learning environment is electric lighting, the most economically beneficial use of solar energy is to use its visible light spectrum to directly replace electric light, avoiding pumps, collectors, silicon panels, inverters, etc. Therefore, maximizing the amount and depth of daylight projected into Rinker Hall reduced energy use from electric lighting. An important tool available to the architect/engineer to reduce energy use from electric lighting is the continuous dimming photocell sensor with the solid-state electronic ballast of the lighting system combined with an effective low-angle daylight louver and diffusion system, appropriate ceiling geometry, and a range of interior surface reflectances. The final facilitation of this strategy comes with joining the thermally advanced performance of exterior walls to the correct ratio and positioning of the high performance and wavelength selective glazing. The lesson learned is that the thermal advantage to be gained in the conventional east-west orientation can be more than offset in the north-south orientation by the additional electrical lighting savings, not to mention the productivity and well-being enhancements of an optimized distribution of low-angle daylight. Materials Minimization A vigorous pursuit of materials minimization led in one case to an acoustical problem associated with HVAC noise in several classrooms. In a visually shielded area at the front of the typical classroom, a 100% accessible ceiling, open to the underside of the slab above, was used to achieve maximum accessibility for future retrofits. Overzealousness in leaving this exposed underside of slab had to be compensated for by an acoustic surface retrofit on the exposed slab. The metal and glass building is preferable for Rinker's location in a humid climate belt, while the freestanding masonry wall addresses campus context and moderates high thermal loads on the west. escalations and does not capture the productivity and well-being benefits. Rinker Hall raises a basic question about green premiums, which is the additional cost of sustainable design. If this building was completed at the same cost per square foot of a nongreen building via strategic redistribution of total dollars and also met the conventional building schedule, no premium exists. Simply stated, for any given budget and schedule, there is a highest sustainable outcome, and Rinker Hall confirms how significant that highest outcome can be. • Photo © Timothy Hursley ABOUT THE AUTHOR Randolph Croxton, FAIA, is the president of Croxton Collaborative Architects, P .C., located in New York City.
Table of Contents Feed for the Digital Edition of High Performing Buildings - Winter 2008 High Performance Buildings - Winter 2008 Passing On the Gift: Heifer International Headquarters Head of the Class: University of Florida’s Rinker Hall How Far Can You Go? Pearl River Tower The Proof Is Performance: How Does 4 Times Square Measure Up? Lighting the Way: Two Guilford County Schools Montreal’s Retail Example: Mountain Equipment Co-op® (MEC) High Performing Buildings - Winter 2008 High Performing Buildings - Winter 2008 - High Performance Buildings - Winter 2008 (Page Cover1) High Performing Buildings - Winter 2008 - High Performance Buildings - Winter 2008 (Page Cover2) High Performing Buildings - Winter 2008 - High Performance Buildings - Winter 2008 (Page 1) High Performing Buildings - Winter 2008 - High Performance Buildings - Winter 2008 (Page 2) High Performing Buildings - Winter 2008 - High Performance Buildings - Winter 2008 (Page 3) High Performing Buildings - Winter 2008 - Passing On the Gift: Heifer International Headquarters (Page 4) High Performing Buildings - Winter 2008 - Passing On the Gift: Heifer International Headquarters (Page 5) High Performing Buildings - Winter 2008 - Passing On the Gift: Heifer International Headquarters (Page 6) High Performing Buildings - Winter 2008 - Passing On the Gift: Heifer International Headquarters (Page 7) High Performing Buildings - Winter 2008 - Passing On the Gift: Heifer International Headquarters (Page 8) High Performing Buildings - Winter 2008 - Passing On the Gift: Heifer International Headquarters (Page 9) High Performing Buildings - Winter 2008 - Passing On the Gift: Heifer International Headquarters (Page 10) High Performing Buildings - Winter 2008 - Passing On the Gift: Heifer International Headquarters (Page 11) High Performing Buildings - Winter 2008 - Passing On the Gift: Heifer International Headquarters (Page 12) High Performing Buildings - Winter 2008 - Passing On the Gift: Heifer International Headquarters (Page 13) High Performing Buildings - Winter 2008 - Head of the Class: University of Florida’s Rinker Hall (Page 14) High Performing Buildings - Winter 2008 - Head of the Class: University of Florida’s Rinker Hall (Page 15) High Performing Buildings - Winter 2008 - Head of the Class: University of Florida’s Rinker Hall (Page 16) High Performing Buildings - Winter 2008 - Head of the Class: University of Florida’s Rinker Hall (Page 17) High Performing Buildings - Winter 2008 - Head of the Class: University of Florida’s Rinker Hall (Page 18) High Performing Buildings - Winter 2008 - Head of the Class: University of Florida’s Rinker Hall (Page 19) High Performing Buildings - Winter 2008 - Head of the Class: University of Florida’s Rinker Hall (Page 20) High Performing Buildings - Winter 2008 - Head of the Class: University of Florida’s Rinker Hall (Page 21) High Performing Buildings - Winter 2008 - How Far Can You Go? Pearl River Tower (Page 22) High Performing Buildings - Winter 2008 - How Far Can You Go? Pearl River Tower (Page 23) High Performing Buildings - Winter 2008 - How Far Can You Go? Pearl River Tower (Page 24) High Performing Buildings - Winter 2008 - How Far Can You Go? Pearl River Tower (Page 25) High Performing Buildings - Winter 2008 - How Far Can You Go? Pearl River Tower (Page 26) High Performing Buildings - Winter 2008 - How Far Can You Go? Pearl River Tower (Page 27) High Performing Buildings - Winter 2008 - How Far Can You Go? Pearl River Tower (Page 28) High Performing Buildings - Winter 2008 - How Far Can You Go? Pearl River Tower (Page 29) High Performing Buildings - Winter 2008 - The Proof Is Performance: How Does 4 Times Square Measure Up? (Page 30) High Performing Buildings - Winter 2008 - The Proof Is Performance: How Does 4 Times Square Measure Up? (Page 31) High Performing Buildings - Winter 2008 - The Proof Is Performance: How Does 4 Times Square Measure Up? (Page 32) High Performing Buildings - Winter 2008 - The Proof Is Performance: How Does 4 Times Square Measure Up? (Page 33) High Performing Buildings - Winter 2008 - The Proof Is Performance: How Does 4 Times Square Measure Up? (Page 34) High Performing Buildings - Winter 2008 - The Proof Is Performance: How Does 4 Times Square Measure Up? (Page 35) High Performing Buildings - Winter 2008 - The Proof Is Performance: How Does 4 Times Square Measure Up? (Page 36) High Performing Buildings - Winter 2008 - The Proof Is Performance: How Does 4 Times Square Measure Up? (Page 37) High Performing Buildings - Winter 2008 - Lighting the Way: Two Guilford County Schools (Page 38) High Performing Buildings - Winter 2008 - Lighting the Way: Two Guilford County Schools (Page 39) High Performing Buildings - Winter 2008 - Lighting the Way: Two Guilford County Schools (Page 40) High Performing Buildings - Winter 2008 - Lighting the Way: Two Guilford County Schools (Page 41) High Performing Buildings - Winter 2008 - Lighting the Way: Two Guilford County Schools (Page 42) High Performing Buildings - Winter 2008 - Lighting the Way: Two Guilford County Schools (Page 43) High Performing Buildings - Winter 2008 - Lighting the Way: Two Guilford County Schools (Page 44) High Performing Buildings - Winter 2008 - Lighting the Way: Two Guilford County Schools (Page 45) High Performing Buildings - Winter 2008 - Lighting the Way: Two Guilford County Schools (Page 46) High Performing Buildings - Winter 2008 - Lighting the Way: Two Guilford County Schools (Page 47) High Performing Buildings - Winter 2008 - Montreal’s Retail Example: Mountain Equipment Co-op® (MEC) (Page 48) High Performing Buildings - Winter 2008 - Montreal’s Retail Example: Mountain Equipment Co-op® (MEC) (Page 49) High Performing Buildings - Winter 2008 - Montreal’s Retail Example: Mountain Equipment Co-op® (MEC) (Page 50) High Performing Buildings - Winter 2008 - Montreal’s Retail Example: Mountain Equipment Co-op® (MEC) (Page 51) High Performing Buildings - Winter 2008 - Montreal’s Retail Example: Mountain Equipment Co-op® (MEC) (Page 52) High Performing Buildings - Winter 2008 - Montreal’s Retail Example: Mountain Equipment Co-op® (MEC) (Page 53) High Performing Buildings - Winter 2008 - Montreal’s Retail Example: Mountain Equipment Co-op® (MEC) (Page 54) High Performing Buildings - Winter 2008 - Montreal’s Retail Example: Mountain Equipment Co-op® (MEC) (Page 55) High Performing Buildings - Winter 2008 - Montreal’s Retail Example: Mountain Equipment Co-op® (MEC) (Page 56) High Performing Buildings - Winter 2008 - Montreal’s Retail Example: Mountain Equipment Co-op® (MEC) (Page Cover3) High Performing Buildings - Winter 2008 - Montreal’s Retail Example: Mountain Equipment Co-op® (MEC) (Page Cover4)
For optimal viewing of this digital publication, please enable JavaScript and then refresh the page. If you would like to try to load the digital publication without using Flash Player detection, please click here.