Defense Technology International - May 2008 - (Page 26) DEFENSE STRATEGIC HYPERSONIC AND HEAT-RESISTANT The link between the Army’s Advanced Hypersonic Weapon (AHW) and Sandia National Laboratories is the hypersonic boost-glide vehicle (BGV), the core technology of the Prompt Global Strike program. BGV is an old technology, first tested more than 60 years ago, but one that has yet to find an operational application. Ballistic missiles are long-range artillery. Operational reentry vehicles are unguided and do not generate aerodynamic lift. However, the German developers of the World War II A-4 (V-2) missile realized that the rocket’s descent velocity could be traded for lift by adding wings to the vehicle and extending its range, and experimented with winged A-4s. SANDIA NATIONAL LABORATORIES Ceramic composites developed by Sandia Labs are key to the Army’s AHW. In the late 1950s, USAF and McDonnell Aircraft tested the Alpha Draco boost-glide research vehicle (BGRV), designed to use aerodynamic lift at double-digit Mach numbers. Alpha Draco was a slender cone with a skirt of movable flaps at the base, which made it possible to trim the vehicle with a nose-up angle of attack. McDonnell went on in the 1960s to design the Isinglass manned reconnaissance BGV for the CIA. A winged vehicle with a relatively high lift-todrag ratio, Isinglass offered nearglobal range and was designed to pass over targets at Mach 20, but was canceled before it flew. Another closely held project from the 1970s was the McDonnell Douglas Advanced Maneuverable Reentry 26 Vehicle (AMaRV), designed to defeat missile-defense systems by performing pre-planned evasive maneuvers in descent. It was tested successfully three times. USAF’s current Conventional Strike Missile, by all accounts, borrows heavily from AMaRV. In the late 1980s, USAF sponsored work on a Hypersonic Glide Vehicle (HGV), a weapon that was possibly intended to attack mobile ICBMs. Its low trajectory and high speed would give the target much less warning time than a ballistic missile. Air- and ground-launched versions were studied. The project was publicly discussed in 1987, with a planned start in 1988, and thereafter disappeared. It was either canceled or went black. Nevertheless, multiple published references to such a program continued after 1988. Air-launched BGVs are exempt from the Strategic Arms Reduction Talks treaty. BGV designs vary, but heating due to air friction is often the driving issue. Conical shapes spin to spread the heat evenly (flying with a small angle of attack, the “windward” side heats up more than the “leeward” side), but a pure cone is hard to package because the center of gravity is behind the center of pressure, which makes it unstable. AMaRV was a biconic shape, which places more volume and mass forward and is easier to package than a pure cone. A winged shape like Isinglass or the late-1980s HGV provides a high lift-to-drag ratio and potentially long range, but heating is concentrated on the sharp leading edges, and the longer the glide range, the more severe the heating challenge. Some designs use a skip-glide profile to mitigate heating, performing repeated climbs above the atmosphere to dissipate heat. Thermal protection systems based on ablative materials can be used to some extent, but become less useful as the glide range increases; and this is where Sandia’s involvement in the AHW becomes a factor. Sandia pioneered the development of ultrahigh-temperature (3,000C) ceramic composite materials based on zirconium diboride and hafnium diboride, used in common with silicon carbide. Sandia reported a breakthrough in this area in October 2003, overcoming structural deficiencies encountered with earlier materials. ■ maneuverable reentry vehicle (RV) that could deliver a variety of payloads, from kinetic penetrators and scatterable munitions to air-deployed unmanned aerial vehicles. There is, however, a strong contingent of elected officials and staff members in Washington that have been skeptical of PGS. In 2005, under pressure from Congress, Darpa eliminated the acronym behind Falcon and the CAV test articles were renamed Hypersonic Test Vehicles. Congress remains steadfastly opposed to the simplest and most near-term PGS solution—putting a conventional warhead on a Trident sealaunched ballistic missile. Much of the technology required to do this has been demonstrated, and it was proposed in the FY2008 defense budget, with the aim of achieving initial operational capability (IOC) in 2010. Congress, however, rejected the proposal and instead directed money to a joint-service PGS project. No Conventional Trident Missile funding was included in the 2009 budget. Under the joint PGS project, the project closest to fruition is USAF’s Conventional Strike Missile (CSM). This is intended to hit targets defined in a July 2006 initial capabilities document—e.g., a missile on a gantry, ships in port, an airfield or hardened targets, including missile silos and bunkers. A CSM would be launched from the continental U.S. and strike within an hour. The basic concept defined by USAF’s Space & Missile Center uses a Minotaur booster from Orbital Sciences Corp., an off-the-shelf system comprising boost stages from the retired Peacekeeper ICBM, carrying a biconic vehicle similar to a scaled-up version of the late-1970s Advanced Maneuvering Reentry Vehicle (AMaRV—see abutting story) weighing 3,800 lb. (1,723 kg.) overall and carrying a 2,000-lb. payload. The CSM would have near-global range from Vandenberg AFB, Calif. It would be distinguishable from a nuclear ICBM launch by its location, which is more than 1,500 km. from U.S. launch silos, and by a skip-glide flight profile. The system would have enough range and speed to cover likely targets while flying an indirect route to avoid neutral nations. Boeing was awarded a study contract covering the CSM system in August 2007. One team member is Honeywell, which developed the guidance system for the original AMaRV along with McDonnell Douglas (now part of Boeing). The goal of the study, to be AviationWeek.com/dti DEFENSE TECHNOLOGY INTERNATIONAL MAY 2008 http://AviationWeek.com/dti
Table of Contents Feed for the Digital Edition of Defense Technology International - May 2008 Defense Technology International - May 2008 Contents Around the World Science Watch Tech Watch Learn and Live Think Again Vive la Difference En Route Out of the Box Package Deal On Watch Inside Job Programs Update The Net Back to the Future Busy Signal Mighty Mites Hull of an Idea Tough Enough Cutting Edge First Person In Review Insight Defense Technology International - May 2008 Defense Technology International - May 2008 - Defense Technology International - May 2008 (Page Cover1) Defense Technology International - May 2008 - Defense Technology International - May 2008 (Page Cover2) Defense Technology International - May 2008 - Defense Technology International - May 2008 (Page 3) Defense Technology International - May 2008 - Defense Technology International - May 2008 (Page 4) Defense Technology International - May 2008 - Defense Technology International - May 2008 (Page 5) Defense Technology International - May 2008 - Contents (Page 6) Defense Technology International - May 2008 - Contents (Page 7) Defense Technology International - May 2008 - Around the World (Page 8) Defense Technology International - May 2008 - Around the World (Page 9) Defense Technology International - May 2008 - Science Watch (Page 10) Defense Technology International - May 2008 - Tech Watch (Page 11) Defense Technology International - May 2008 - Learn and Live (Page 12) Defense Technology International - May 2008 - Learn and Live (Page 13) Defense Technology International - May 2008 - Think Again (Page 14) Defense Technology International - May 2008 - Think Again (Page 15) Defense Technology International - May 2008 - Vive la Difference (Page 16) Defense Technology International - May 2008 - En Route (Page 17) Defense Technology International - May 2008 - Out of the Box (Page 18) Defense Technology International - May 2008 - Package Deal (Page 19) Defense Technology International - May 2008 - Package Deal (Page 20) Defense Technology International - May 2008 - On Watch (Page 21) Defense Technology International - May 2008 - Inside Job (Page 22) Defense Technology International - May 2008 - The Net (Page 23) Defense Technology International - May 2008 - The Net (Page 24) Defense Technology International - May 2008 - Back to the Future (Page 25) Defense Technology International - May 2008 - Back to the Future (Page 26) Defense Technology International - May 2008 - Back to the Future (Page 27) Defense Technology International - May 2008 - Back to the Future (Page 28) Defense Technology International - May 2008 - Busy Signal (Page 29) Defense Technology International - May 2008 - Busy Signal (Page 30) Defense Technology International - May 2008 - Busy Signal (Page 31) Defense Technology International - May 2008 - Mighty Mites (Page 32) Defense Technology International - May 2008 - Mighty Mites (Page 33) Defense Technology International - May 2008 - Mighty Mites (Page 34) Defense Technology International - May 2008 - Mighty Mites (Page 35) Defense Technology International - May 2008 - Mighty Mites (Page 36) Defense Technology International - May 2008 - Mighty Mites (Page 37) Defense Technology International - May 2008 - Hull of an Idea (Page 38) Defense Technology International - May 2008 - Hull of an Idea (Page 39) Defense Technology International - May 2008 - Tough Enough (Page 40) Defense Technology International - May 2008 - Tough Enough (Page 41) Defense Technology International - May 2008 - Tough Enough (Page 42) Defense Technology International - May 2008 - Tough Enough (Page 42AI) Defense Technology International - May 2008 - Tough Enough (Page 42BI) Defense Technology International - May 2008 - Tough Enough (Page 43) Defense Technology International - May 2008 - Cutting Edge (Page 44) Defense Technology International - May 2008 - Cutting Edge (Page 45) Defense Technology International - May 2008 - First Person (Page 46) Defense Technology International - May 2008 - First Person (Page 47) Defense Technology International - May 2008 - In Review (Page 48) Defense Technology International - May 2008 - In Review (Page 49) Defense Technology International - May 2008 - Insight (Page 50) Defense Technology International - May 2008 - Insight (Page Cover3) Defense Technology International - May 2008 - Insight (Page Cover4)
For optimal viewing of this digital publication, please enable JavaScript and then refresh the page. If you would like to try to load the digital publication without using Flash Player detection, please click here.