Pollution Engineering - November 2008 - (Page 62) Advertorial HOWTO: Prevent Chemical Vapor Intrusion By REGENESIS B rownfield site development often requires a REMEDIAcontaminant vapor barrier to prevent volatile o r g a n i c con t a m i n a n t s in the subsurface from migrating into newly constructed buildings, potentially impacting indoor air quality. Historically, plastic sheet materials such as highdensity polyethylene (HDPE), known for its chemical resistance, have been applied as contaminant vapor barriers. The use of these materials, however, requires laborintensive cutting and seaming to ensure a continuous and cohesive barrier to vapor migration. This installation process can be intensive, difficult, and costly when applied to construction foundations with multiple penetrations (e.g. piping, electrical conduits). More recently, spray-applied asphalt/ latex membrane-type waterproofing materials have been widely promoted as a reasonable solution. While easy to apply and proven to retard water migration through concrete, the use of these asphalt/latex materials for repelling volatile organic compounds (VOCs), such as benzene and chlorinated solvents, may latex membranes. Geo-Seal™, a recently developed combe complicated by the affinity for contaminant vapors. It is widely recognized posite membrane system, offers exceptional that asphalt/latex-based products are, in chemical resistance for use as a gas vapor fact, highly susceptible to partitioning by barrier on construction sites with environVOCs, particularly chlorinated dry clean- mentally impacted soil and/or groundwater. ing-type solvents. This poses a concern This new technology was announced in a as the VOCs will partition into the mem- key platform presentation at the recent Sixth brane material itself potentially moving International Symposium on Remediation of through the vapor barrier over time and Chlorinated and Recalcitrant Compounds in impacting indoor air quality. Recently, a Monterey, Calif. Developed by Land Science new vapor barrier system has been developed and proven to resist such a parti- Technologies, a division of Regenesis, tioning effect and withstand contaminant Geo-Seal (patent pending) is the first permeation breakthrough for a period 18 vapor barrier technology to combine times longer than that of simple asphalt/ the durability and chemical resistance of two bonded HDPE layers with the ease and quality of installation found in a basic spray-applied asphalt/latex barrier. Geo-Seal is installed on-site prior to foundation construction. Data indicated that Geo-Seal was 645 percent more protective against volatile organic vapor transmission than commercially available spray-applied asphalt/latex products, with less than 0.16 the contaminant permeance, and resistance to contaminant permeation breakthrough for a period 18 times longer. For more information and/or a free cost estimate contact Regenesis at 949-366-8000 or visit www.regenesis.com. (949) 366-8000 • info@regenesis.com • www.regenesis.com 62 Pollution Engineering NOVEMBER2008 | HOWTO GUIDE http://www.regenesis.com http://www.regenesis.com http://www.regenesis.com
Table of Contents Feed for the Digital Edition of Pollution Engineering - November 2008 Pollution Engineering - November 2008 Contents The Editor's Desk EnviroNews PE Events Legal Lookout Casebook Canada Environment Management The Green Files Waste Island Phase I ESAs and Vapor Intrusion Meeting the Mercury Target Wet ESPs - The Sky's the Limit Most Successful IFAT China Ever Thermoplastic to the Rescue Install a Trench Without Open Excavations Remediate Impacted Soils Without Accumulation of Metabolites Apply an Alternative to Wet ESP Solve These Common Pump Problems Minimize Risks Handling Ammonia Monitor International Regulatory Developments for Audits Skim Oil and Save Prevent Chemical Vapor Intrusion Spill Control and Containment Products Pumps and Systems Equipment PE Products Classified Marketplace Advertisers Index State Rules Pollution Engineering - November 2008 Pollution Engineering - November 2008 - Pollution Engineering - November 2008 (Page Cover1) Pollution Engineering - November 2008 - Pollution Engineering - November 2008 (Page Cover2) Pollution Engineering - November 2008 - Pollution Engineering - November 2008 (Page 3) Pollution Engineering - November 2008 - Contents (Page 4) Pollution Engineering - November 2008 - Contents (Page 5) Pollution Engineering - November 2008 - Contents (Page 6) Pollution Engineering - November 2008 - The Editor's Desk (Page 7) Pollution Engineering - November 2008 - The Editor's Desk (Page 8) Pollution Engineering - November 2008 - PE Events (Page 9) Pollution Engineering - November 2008 - PE Events (Page 10) Pollution Engineering - November 2008 - PE Events (Page 11) Pollution Engineering - November 2008 - PE Events (Page 12) Pollution Engineering - November 2008 - PE Events (Page 13) Pollution Engineering - November 2008 - PE Events (Page 14) Pollution Engineering - November 2008 - Legal Lookout (Page 15) Pollution Engineering - November 2008 - Legal Lookout (Page 16) Pollution Engineering - November 2008 - Casebook Canada (Page 17) Pollution Engineering - November 2008 - Casebook Canada (Page 18) Pollution Engineering - November 2008 - Environment Management (Page 19) Pollution Engineering - November 2008 - Environment Management (Page 20) Pollution Engineering - November 2008 - The Green Files (Page 21) Pollution Engineering - November 2008 - The Green Files (Page 22) Pollution Engineering - November 2008 - The Green Files (Page 23) Pollution Engineering - November 2008 - Waste Island (Page 24) Pollution Engineering - November 2008 - Waste Island (Page 25) Pollution Engineering - November 2008 - Waste Island (Page 26) Pollution Engineering - November 2008 - Waste Island (Page 27) Pollution Engineering - November 2008 - Waste Island (Page 28) Pollution Engineering - November 2008 - Phase I ESAs and Vapor Intrusion (Page 29) Pollution Engineering - November 2008 - Phase I ESAs and Vapor Intrusion (Page 30) Pollution Engineering - November 2008 - Phase I ESAs and Vapor Intrusion (Page 31) Pollution Engineering - November 2008 - Meeting the Mercury Target (Page 32) Pollution Engineering - November 2008 - Meeting the Mercury Target (Page 33) Pollution Engineering - November 2008 - Meeting the Mercury Target (Page 34) Pollution Engineering - November 2008 - Meeting the Mercury Target (Page 35) Pollution Engineering - November 2008 - Meeting the Mercury Target (Page 36) Pollution Engineering - November 2008 - Meeting the Mercury Target (Page 37) Pollution Engineering - November 2008 - Meeting the Mercury Target (Page 38) Pollution Engineering - November 2008 - Meeting the Mercury Target (Page 39) Pollution Engineering - November 2008 - Wet ESPs - The Sky's the Limit (Page 40) Pollution Engineering - November 2008 - Wet ESPs - The Sky's the Limit (Page 41) Pollution Engineering - November 2008 - Wet ESPs - The Sky's the Limit (Page 42) Pollution Engineering - November 2008 - Wet ESPs - The Sky's the Limit (Page 43) Pollution Engineering - November 2008 - Wet ESPs - The Sky's the Limit (Page 44) Pollution Engineering - November 2008 - Wet ESPs - The Sky's the Limit (Page 45) Pollution Engineering - November 2008 - Most Successful IFAT China Ever (Page 46) Pollution Engineering - November 2008 - Thermoplastic to the Rescue (Page 47) Pollution Engineering - November 2008 - Thermoplastic to the Rescue (Page 48) Pollution Engineering - November 2008 - Install a Trench Without Open Excavations (Page 49) Pollution Engineering - November 2008 - Install a Trench Without Open Excavations (Page 50) Pollution Engineering - November 2008 - Remediate Impacted Soils Without Accumulation of Metabolites (Page 51) Pollution Engineering - November 2008 - Remediate Impacted Soils Without Accumulation of Metabolites (Page 52) Pollution Engineering - November 2008 - Remediate Impacted Soils Without Accumulation of Metabolites (Page 53) Pollution Engineering - November 2008 - Apply an Alternative to Wet ESP (Page 54) Pollution Engineering - November 2008 - Apply an Alternative to Wet ESP (Page 55) Pollution Engineering - November 2008 - Apply an Alternative to Wet ESP (Page 56) Pollution Engineering - November 2008 - Solve These Common Pump Problems (Page 57) Pollution Engineering - November 2008 - Solve These Common Pump Problems (Page 58) Pollution Engineering - November 2008 - Minimize Risks Handling Ammonia (Page 59) Pollution Engineering - November 2008 - Monitor International Regulatory Developments for Audits (Page 60) Pollution Engineering - November 2008 - Skim Oil and Save (Page 61) Pollution Engineering - November 2008 - Prevent Chemical Vapor Intrusion (Page 62) Pollution Engineering - November 2008 - Prevent Chemical Vapor Intrusion (Page 63) Pollution Engineering - November 2008 - Prevent Chemical Vapor Intrusion (Page 64) Pollution Engineering - November 2008 - Prevent Chemical Vapor Intrusion (Page 65) Pollution Engineering - November 2008 - Pumps and Systems Equipment (Page 66) Pollution Engineering - November 2008 - PE Products (Page 67) Pollution Engineering - November 2008 - PE Products (Page 68) Pollution Engineering - November 2008 - Classified Marketplace (Page 69) Pollution Engineering - November 2008 - Classified Marketplace (Page 70) Pollution Engineering - November 2008 - Classified Marketplace (Page 71) Pollution Engineering - November 2008 - Classified Marketplace (Page 72) Pollution Engineering - November 2008 - Advertisers Index (Page 73) Pollution Engineering - November 2008 - State Rules (Page 74) Pollution Engineering - November 2008 - State Rules (Page Cover3) Pollution Engineering - November 2008 - State Rules (Page Cover4)
For optimal viewing of this digital publication, please enable JavaScript and then refresh the page. If you would like to try to load the digital publication without using Flash Player detection, please click here.