MSDN Magazine - January 2009 - (Page 120) { End BrackEt } VikraM DEnDi The Emergence Of Machine Translation Historians and futurologists alike have been fascinated with the idea of communication without language barriers. Science fiction luminaries have given flight to their thoughts in creating the Babel Fish or the Universal Translator, while history tells us about the legendary Rosetta Stone on which one text was translated into three languages. In an increasingly flattened world, it is more important than ever before to be able to get a message across, irrespective of language. There have been many approaches adopted over the last few decades to solve this problem. Machine translation (MT) is one that’s been around for decades yet has failed to become ubiquitous even after years of investment in research. Back in the 1960s there was an acronym coined for what researchers wanted to achieve with translation: FAHQT— Fully Automatic High-Quality Translation of General Text. This idealistic approach to MT proved to be unrealistic, and over time a perhaps more accurate acronym was coined: FAUT—Fully Automatic Useful Translation. The goal was not to compete with a human translator but to create a system that was sufficiently accurate to deliver real-time translations that were useful to the average user. At Microsoft, researchers have been working toward this goal for more than a decade. The approach that the researchers here adopt combines rule-based logic with statistical methods, creating a hybrid statistical syntactic system. For language pairs (original and translated text) where we can make use of substantial linguistic information, we utilize grammar and syntax knowledge in pre- and post-processing around a statistical core engine. Where we do not have as much information, we resort to a purely statistical model that scales well to a large number of language pairs. The machine translation technology that we developed has already proven itself to be very valuable within Microsoft, having been used since 2003 to translate nearly 140,000 Knowledge Base articles into nine major languages. Many other teams within the company have been using the technology to lower the cost and improve the coverage of their localization efforts. In 2005, the MT team was asked to broaden its scope, and since then we have been focused on expanding the use of this technology outside the company. Our general domain translation Web service has been exposed through search (providing translation functionality to search results), Microsoft Office (providing snippet and document transla120 msdn magazine Machine translation has the potential to bridge language gaps across the world. tions), Windows Live Messenger (as a translation bot), and others (see microsofttranslator.com). Efforts to provide general domain translation services for the Web are gaining momentum. The true value of MT is not just in the quality delivered by the translation engine but in how these translations are delivered within scenarios and the means to address any issues of quality. Unlike search, news, entertainment, or gaming, the perceived value of translation has been limited due to historical inconsistency in translation quality. It is critical for product builders to understand how to maximize the potential of MT. Unlike today, where most of the translation offerings are portals and translation sites, the greatest value of machine translation will be as a basic and essential ingredient for scenarios that target a linguistically diverse audience. We believe that it is important to provide the means for developers, communities, and content creators to integrate translation into their workflows and use it as a means to harness the power of community. The MSDN Translation Wiki is a good example of these principles in practice. The community is empowered to help improve the quality of the translation and also to contribute new content—a combination of core technology and the power of community. Machine translation is an “imperfect” technology and, not unlike evaluating search results, puts the onus on the user to apply her judgment toward the appropriateness of the results delivered. Also, like search, it has the possibility of being surprisingly accurate at times and displays the scope to continually improve with new data. Microsoft is making significant investments in increasing the quality of translations. I predict that this year will be a significant one for machine translation. In conjunction with the massive power that can be harnessed from the increasingly social Web, machine translation is beginning to deliver on its potential. In the coming months, watch for new and exciting approaches with machine translation that will bridge language gaps across the world. Vikram DenDi is a Senior Product Manager on the Microsoft Translator team. He is responsible for business strategy and product planning and is working toward empowering developers to help build a Web without walls. He blogs at viks.org and at blogs.msdn.com/translation. http://www.microsofttranslator.com http://www.viks.org http://blogs.msdn.com/translation
Table of Contents Feed for the Digital Edition of MSDN Magazine - January 2009 Toolbox CLR Inside Out Basic Instincts Cutting Edge Test Run First Look Geneva Framework Silverlight Windows Mobile Service Station Security Briefs Extreme ASP.NET Foundations .NET Matters { End Bracket } MSDN Magazine - January 2009 MSDN Magazine - January 2009 - (Page Intro) MSDN Magazine - January 2009 - (Page Cover1) MSDN Magazine - January 2009 - (Page Cover2) MSDN Magazine - January 2009 - (Page 1) MSDN Magazine - January 2009 - (Page 2) MSDN Magazine - January 2009 - (Page 3) MSDN Magazine - January 2009 - (Page 4) MSDN Magazine - January 2009 - (Page 5) MSDN Magazine - January 2009 - (Page 6) MSDN Magazine - January 2009 - (Page 7) MSDN Magazine - January 2009 - (Page 8) MSDN Magazine - January 2009 - Toolbox (Page 9) MSDN Magazine - January 2009 - Toolbox (Page 10) MSDN Magazine - January 2009 - Toolbox (Page 11) MSDN Magazine - January 2009 - Toolbox (Page 12) MSDN Magazine - January 2009 - Toolbox (Page 13) MSDN Magazine - January 2009 - Toolbox (Page 14) MSDN Magazine - January 2009 - CLR Inside Out (Page 15) MSDN Magazine - January 2009 - CLR Inside Out (Page 16) MSDN Magazine - January 2009 - CLR Inside Out (Page 17) MSDN Magazine - January 2009 - CLR Inside Out (Page 18) MSDN Magazine - January 2009 - CLR Inside Out (Page 19) MSDN Magazine - January 2009 - CLR Inside Out (Page 20) MSDN Magazine - January 2009 - Basic Instincts (Page 21) MSDN Magazine - January 2009 - Basic Instincts (Page 22) MSDN Magazine - January 2009 - Basic Instincts (Page 23) MSDN Magazine - January 2009 - Basic Instincts (Page 24) MSDN Magazine - January 2009 - Basic Instincts (Page 25) MSDN Magazine - January 2009 - Basic Instincts (Page 26) MSDN Magazine - January 2009 - Basic Instincts (Page 27) MSDN Magazine - January 2009 - Basic Instincts (Page 28) MSDN Magazine - January 2009 - Basic Instincts (Page 29) MSDN Magazine - January 2009 - Basic Instincts (Page 30) MSDN Magazine - January 2009 - Cutting Edge (Page 31) MSDN Magazine - January 2009 - Cutting Edge (Page 32) MSDN Magazine - January 2009 - Cutting Edge (Page 33) MSDN Magazine - January 2009 - Cutting Edge (Page 34) MSDN Magazine - January 2009 - Cutting Edge (Page 35) MSDN Magazine - January 2009 - Cutting Edge (Page 36) MSDN Magazine - January 2009 - Cutting Edge (Page 37) MSDN Magazine - January 2009 - Cutting Edge (Page 38) MSDN Magazine - January 2009 - Test Run (Page 39) MSDN Magazine - January 2009 - Test Run (Page 40) MSDN Magazine - January 2009 - Test Run (Page 41) MSDN Magazine - January 2009 - Test Run (Page 42) MSDN Magazine - January 2009 - Test Run (Page 43) MSDN Magazine - January 2009 - Test Run (Page 44) MSDN Magazine - January 2009 - Test Run (Page 45) MSDN Magazine - January 2009 - Test Run (Page 46) MSDN Magazine - January 2009 - Test Run (Page 47) MSDN Magazine - January 2009 - Test Run (Page 48) MSDN Magazine - January 2009 - Test Run (Page 49) MSDN Magazine - January 2009 - First Look (Page 50) MSDN Magazine - January 2009 - First Look (Page 51) MSDN Magazine - January 2009 - First Look (Page 52) MSDN Magazine - January 2009 - First Look (Page 53) MSDN Magazine - January 2009 - First Look (Page 54) MSDN Magazine - January 2009 - First Look (Page 55) MSDN Magazine - January 2009 - First Look (Page 56) MSDN Magazine - January 2009 - First Look (Page 57) MSDN Magazine - January 2009 - First Look (Page 58) MSDN Magazine - January 2009 - First Look (Page 59) MSDN Magazine - January 2009 - First Look (Page 60) MSDN Magazine - January 2009 - First Look (Page 61) MSDN Magazine - January 2009 - First Look (Page 62) MSDN Magazine - January 2009 - First Look (Page 63) MSDN Magazine - January 2009 - Geneva Framework (Page 64) MSDN Magazine - January 2009 - Geneva Framework (Page 65) MSDN Magazine - January 2009 - Geneva Framework (Page 66) MSDN Magazine - January 2009 - Geneva Framework (Page 67) MSDN Magazine - January 2009 - Geneva Framework (Page 68) MSDN Magazine - January 2009 - Geneva Framework (Page 69) MSDN Magazine - January 2009 - Geneva Framework (Page 70) MSDN Magazine - January 2009 - Geneva Framework (Page 71) MSDN Magazine - January 2009 - Geneva Framework (Page 72) MSDN Magazine - January 2009 - Geneva Framework (Page 73) MSDN Magazine - January 2009 - Geneva Framework (Page 74) MSDN Magazine - January 2009 - Silverlight (Page 75) MSDN Magazine - January 2009 - Silverlight (Page 76) MSDN Magazine - January 2009 - Silverlight (Page 77) MSDN Magazine - January 2009 - Silverlight (Page 78) MSDN Magazine - January 2009 - Silverlight (Page 79) MSDN Magazine - January 2009 - Silverlight (Page 80) MSDN Magazine - January 2009 - Silverlight (Page 81) MSDN Magazine - January 2009 - Silverlight (Page 82) MSDN Magazine - January 2009 - Silverlight (Page 83) MSDN Magazine - January 2009 - Silverlight (Page 84) MSDN Magazine - January 2009 - Silverlight (Page 85) MSDN Magazine - January 2009 - Silverlight (Page 86) MSDN Magazine - January 2009 - Silverlight (Page 87) MSDN Magazine - January 2009 - Windows Mobile (Page 88) MSDN Magazine - January 2009 - Windows Mobile (Page 89) MSDN Magazine - January 2009 - Windows Mobile (Page 90) MSDN Magazine - January 2009 - Windows Mobile (Page 91) MSDN Magazine - January 2009 - Windows Mobile (Page 92) MSDN Magazine - January 2009 - Service Station (Page 93) MSDN Magazine - January 2009 - Service Station (Page 94) MSDN Magazine - January 2009 - Service Station (Page 95) MSDN Magazine - January 2009 - Service Station (Page 96) MSDN Magazine - January 2009 - Service Station (Page 97) MSDN Magazine - January 2009 - Service Station (Page 98) MSDN Magazine - January 2009 - Security Briefs (Page 99) MSDN Magazine - January 2009 - Security Briefs (Page 100) MSDN Magazine - January 2009 - Security Briefs (Page 101) MSDN Magazine - January 2009 - Security Briefs (Page 102) MSDN Magazine - January 2009 - Extreme ASP.NET (Page 103) MSDN Magazine - January 2009 - Extreme ASP.NET (Page 104) MSDN Magazine - January 2009 - Extreme ASP.NET (Page 105) MSDN Magazine - January 2009 - Extreme ASP.NET (Page 106) MSDN Magazine - January 2009 - Extreme ASP.NET (Page 107) MSDN Magazine - January 2009 - Extreme ASP.NET (Page 108) MSDN Magazine - January 2009 - Foundations (Page 109) MSDN Magazine - January 2009 - Foundations (Page 110) MSDN Magazine - January 2009 - Foundations (Page 111) MSDN Magazine - January 2009 - Foundations (Page 112) MSDN Magazine - January 2009 - Foundations (Page 113) MSDN Magazine - January 2009 - Foundations (Page 114) MSDN Magazine - January 2009 - Foundations (Page 115) MSDN Magazine - January 2009 - .NET Matters (Page 116) MSDN Magazine - January 2009 - .NET Matters (Page 117) MSDN Magazine - January 2009 - .NET Matters (Page 118) MSDN Magazine - January 2009 - .NET Matters (Page 119) MSDN Magazine - January 2009 - { End Bracket } (Page 120) MSDN Magazine - January 2009 - { End Bracket } (Page Cover3) MSDN Magazine - January 2009 - { End Bracket } (Page Cover4)
For optimal viewing of this digital publication, please enable JavaScript and then refresh the page. If you would like to try to load the digital publication without using Flash Player detection, please click here.