MSDN Magazine - February 2009 - (Page 115) RaMon aRjona GoinG PLaces Mobile Device Provisioning With SyncML In the April 2008 issue of MSDN Magazine, Mike Calligaro wrote a Going Places column about provisioning a Windows Mobile device using XML files and the DMProcessConfigXML API (see msdn.microsoft.com/magazine/cc500581). The XML files Mike used were based on the Open Mobile Alliance (OMA) Client Provisioning (OMA-CP) standard for device management, formerly known as Wireless Application Protocol (WAP). OMA-CP works fine for managing a few devices, and in his column Mike has suggestions for ways to push provisioning information to multiple devices at once. But what if you need to provision thousands of devices in a systematic way over a long period of time? And what if you need to know what software and registry settings are already set on the devices you’re trying to manage? This sort of large, coordinated provisioning effort is the domain of OMA Device Management (OMA-DM). The OMA-DM protocol is based on a dialect of XML called SyncML, and it can be used to provision and manage devices in an enterprise scenario. This column will discuss the structure of a SyncML document used in the OMA-DM protocol. I will cover specific usage scenarios for the Windows Mobile platform, including remotely wiping the device. I will also demonstrate how you can set a browser favorite on the device using the XML from Mike’s column in conjunction with OMA-DM. Figure 1 SyncHdr 1.2 DM/1.2 1 1 https://mgmt.contoso.com/ urn:uuid:6D67E196-D082-4c91-A0DD-DEB3D1D58EB5 MyDeviceName b64 syncml:auth-md5 ODZlMDNiYmM1MjA1YTI3MDc5MDk2MDcwYTA4OGM2Zjg= SyncML: XML for Synchronization What Is OMA? OMA is an industry group comprising more than 200 mobile operators, mobile device manufacturers, and software vendors (including Microsoft). OMA was formed in 2002 to create a single group to manage the burgeoning number of mobile device standards that were appearing in the marketplace, including WAP, Device Management, and SyncML (see openmobilealliance.org for details). This multiplicity of groups was creating duplication of work, so the concerned industry partners got together and brought all of these important initiatives together under a single umbrella group. OMA standards help make it easier to work with mobile devices and networks by creating a nonproprietary way to communicate between technologies. SyncML and OMA-DM are two aspects of this open protocol family. Like all protocols, they are subject to a certain amount of interpretation, and every vendor is free to supply its own value-added extensions. But working with them is easier and more straightforward than trying to negotiate a proprietary, vendor-specific format. SyncML is an XML-based markup that is used as the basis for most protocols defined by OMA. A SyncML document is called a message. The message must be well-formed XML but not necessarily valid XML. That is, it must have matching open and close tags for all elements, must have quotes around all attributes, and otherwise conform to the basic definition of well-formedness that is essential to any document calling itself XML. While there is a SyncML document type definition (DTD), there is no requirement that the sender or receiver validate against it. One of the reasons for this is that validation requires extra memory and processor time, and mobile devices tend to be short on both of these resources. The message, in turn, contains command elements that do the heavy lifting of specific OMA protocols. SyncML and OMA-DM are transport independent. There are transport bindings defined for HTTP and Object Exchange (OBEX), and it would be possible for other bindings to be defined. This makes SyncML and OMA-DM useful for provisioning devices over the air. Using SyncML and OMA-DM with a compliant device-management server, you can push configurations to a device without using a memory card, without tethering the device, and without asking the end user for interaction, such as visiting a Web site. One or more messages is contained, conceptually, in a SyncML Send your questions and comments to goplaces@microsoft.com. February 2009 115 http://msdn.microsoft.com/magazine/cc500581 http://www.openmobilealliance.org
Table of Contents Feed for the Digital Edition of MSDN Magazine - February 2009 MSDN Magazine - February 2009 Contents Toolbox CLR Inside Out Data Points Cutting Edge Patterns In Practice Best Practices .Net Interop "Oslo" Basics Patterns Silverlight Under The Table Foundations Windows With C++ .NET Matters Going Places { End Bracket } MSDN Magazine - February 2009 MSDN Magazine - February 2009 - (Page Splash1) MSDN Magazine - February 2009 - Contents (Page Cover1) MSDN Magazine - February 2009 - Contents (Page Cover2) MSDN Magazine - February 2009 - Contents (Page 1) MSDN Magazine - February 2009 - Contents (Page 2) MSDN Magazine - February 2009 - Contents (Page 3) MSDN Magazine - February 2009 - Contents (Page 4) MSDN Magazine - February 2009 - Contents (Page 5) MSDN Magazine - February 2009 - Contents (Page 6) MSDN Magazine - February 2009 - Contents (Page 7) MSDN Magazine - February 2009 - Contents (Page 8) MSDN Magazine - February 2009 - Contents (Page 9) MSDN Magazine - February 2009 - Contents (Page 10) MSDN Magazine - February 2009 - Toolbox (Page 11) MSDN Magazine - February 2009 - Toolbox (Page 12) MSDN Magazine - February 2009 - Toolbox (Page 13) MSDN Magazine - February 2009 - Toolbox (Page 14) MSDN Magazine - February 2009 - CLR Inside Out (Page 15) MSDN Magazine - February 2009 - CLR Inside Out (Page 16) MSDN Magazine - February 2009 - CLR Inside Out (Page 17) MSDN Magazine - February 2009 - CLR Inside Out (Page 18) MSDN Magazine - February 2009 - CLR Inside Out (Page 19) MSDN Magazine - February 2009 - CLR Inside Out (Page 20) MSDN Magazine - February 2009 - CLR Inside Out (Page 21) MSDN Magazine - February 2009 - CLR Inside Out (Page 22) MSDN Magazine - February 2009 - Data Points (Page 23) MSDN Magazine - February 2009 - Data Points (Page 24) MSDN Magazine - February 2009 - Data Points (Page 25) MSDN Magazine - February 2009 - Data Points (Page 26) MSDN Magazine - February 2009 - Data Points (Page 27) MSDN Magazine - February 2009 - Data Points (Page 28) MSDN Magazine - February 2009 - Data Points (Page 29) MSDN Magazine - February 2009 - Data Points (Page 30) MSDN Magazine - February 2009 - Cutting Edge (Page 31) MSDN Magazine - February 2009 - Cutting Edge (Page 32) MSDN Magazine - February 2009 - Cutting Edge (Page 33) MSDN Magazine - February 2009 - Cutting Edge (Page 34) MSDN Magazine - February 2009 - Cutting Edge (Page 35) MSDN Magazine - February 2009 - Cutting Edge (Page 36) MSDN Magazine - February 2009 - Cutting Edge (Page 37) MSDN Magazine - February 2009 - Cutting Edge (Page 38) MSDN Magazine - February 2009 - Patterns In Practice (Page 39) MSDN Magazine - February 2009 - Patterns In Practice (Page 40) MSDN Magazine - February 2009 - Patterns In Practice (Page 41) MSDN Magazine - February 2009 - Patterns In Practice (Page 42) MSDN Magazine - February 2009 - Patterns In Practice (Page 43) MSDN Magazine - February 2009 - Patterns In Practice (Page 44) MSDN Magazine - February 2009 - Patterns In Practice (Page 45) MSDN Magazine - February 2009 - Best Practices (Page 46) MSDN Magazine - February 2009 - Best Practices (Page 47) MSDN Magazine - February 2009 - Best Practices (Page 48) MSDN Magazine - February 2009 - Best Practices (Page 49) MSDN Magazine - February 2009 - Best Practices (Page 50) MSDN Magazine - February 2009 - Best Practices (Page 51) MSDN Magazine - February 2009 - Best Practices (Page 52) MSDN Magazine - February 2009 - Best Practices (Page 53) MSDN Magazine - February 2009 - Best Practices (Page 54) MSDN Magazine - February 2009 - Best Practices (Page 55) MSDN Magazine - February 2009 - Best Practices (Page 56) MSDN Magazine - February 2009 - .Net Interop (Page 57) MSDN Magazine - February 2009 - .Net Interop (Page 58) MSDN Magazine - February 2009 - .Net Interop (Page 59) MSDN Magazine - February 2009 - .Net Interop (Page 60) MSDN Magazine - February 2009 - .Net Interop (Page 61) MSDN Magazine - February 2009 - .Net Interop (Page 62) MSDN Magazine - February 2009 - "Oslo" Basics (Page 63) MSDN Magazine - February 2009 - "Oslo" Basics (Page 64) MSDN Magazine - February 2009 - "Oslo" Basics (Page 65) MSDN Magazine - February 2009 - "Oslo" Basics (Page 66) MSDN Magazine - February 2009 - "Oslo" Basics (Page 67) MSDN Magazine - February 2009 - "Oslo" Basics (Page 68) MSDN Magazine - February 2009 - "Oslo" Basics (Page 69) MSDN Magazine - February 2009 - "Oslo" Basics (Page 70) MSDN Magazine - February 2009 - "Oslo" Basics (Page 71) MSDN Magazine - February 2009 - Patterns (Page 72) MSDN Magazine - February 2009 - Patterns (Page 73) MSDN Magazine - February 2009 - Patterns (Page 74) MSDN Magazine - February 2009 - Patterns (Page 75) MSDN Magazine - February 2009 - Patterns (Page 76) MSDN Magazine - February 2009 - Patterns (Page 77) MSDN Magazine - February 2009 - Patterns (Page 78) MSDN Magazine - February 2009 - Patterns (Page 79) MSDN Magazine - February 2009 - Patterns (Page 80) MSDN Magazine - February 2009 - Patterns (Page 81) MSDN Magazine - February 2009 - Patterns (Page 82) MSDN Magazine - February 2009 - Patterns (Page 83) MSDN Magazine - February 2009 - Silverlight (Page 84) MSDN Magazine - February 2009 - Silverlight (Page 85) MSDN Magazine - February 2009 - Silverlight (Page 86) MSDN Magazine - February 2009 - Silverlight (Page 87) MSDN Magazine - February 2009 - Silverlight (Page 88) MSDN Magazine - February 2009 - Silverlight (Page 89) MSDN Magazine - February 2009 - Silverlight (Page 90) MSDN Magazine - February 2009 - Silverlight (Page 91) MSDN Magazine - February 2009 - Silverlight (Page 92) MSDN Magazine - February 2009 - Silverlight (Page 93) MSDN Magazine - February 2009 - Silverlight (Page 94) MSDN Magazine - February 2009 - Under The Table (Page 95) MSDN Magazine - February 2009 - Under The Table (Page 96) MSDN Magazine - February 2009 - Under The Table (Page 97) MSDN Magazine - February 2009 - Under The Table (Page 98) MSDN Magazine - February 2009 - Under The Table (Page 99) MSDN Magazine - February 2009 - Under The Table (Page 100) MSDN Magazine - February 2009 - Foundations (Page 101) MSDN Magazine - February 2009 - Foundations (Page 102) MSDN Magazine - February 2009 - Foundations (Page 103) MSDN Magazine - February 2009 - Foundations (Page 104) MSDN Magazine - February 2009 - Foundations (Page 105) MSDN Magazine - February 2009 - Foundations (Page 106) MSDN Magazine - February 2009 - Windows With C++ (Page 107) MSDN Magazine - February 2009 - Windows With C++ (Page 108) MSDN Magazine - February 2009 - Windows With C++ (Page 109) MSDN Magazine - February 2009 - Windows With C++ (Page 110) MSDN Magazine - February 2009 - .NET Matters (Page 111) MSDN Magazine - February 2009 - .NET Matters (Page 112) MSDN Magazine - February 2009 - .NET Matters (Page 113) MSDN Magazine - February 2009 - .NET Matters (Page 114) MSDN Magazine - February 2009 - Going Places (Page 115) MSDN Magazine - February 2009 - Going Places (Page 116) MSDN Magazine - February 2009 - Going Places (Page 117) MSDN Magazine - February 2009 - Going Places (Page 118) MSDN Magazine - February 2009 - Going Places (Page 119) MSDN Magazine - February 2009 - { End Bracket } (Page 120) MSDN Magazine - February 2009 - { End Bracket } (Page Cover3) MSDN Magazine - February 2009 - { End Bracket } (Page Cover4)
For optimal viewing of this digital publication, please enable JavaScript and then refresh the page. If you would like to try to load the digital publication without using Flash Player detection, please click here.