MSDN Magazine - December 2008 - (Page 19) One possible approach to address cation is parallelized, the results may this problem is to incorporate some be computed in a different order by sort of dynamic-tuning logic to adjust the concurrent tasks. Then it is up to concurrency levels based on the apthe programmer to sort out the results plication (for example, using statistiwhere necessary to ensure correctness cal methods). Further inspection of and functionality. concurrency control and tuning apAdjusting programs to perform in proaches is also out of the scope of concurrent and parallel environments our present discussion. is not trivial. General-purpose tuning Appropriate tuning may lead to is even harder, and it cannot guarantee improvements in performance. The optimal behavior for all apps. Underfollowing is an encouraging example standing the underlying structure of showing a similar experiment, where the concurrent environment can help many factors and parameters in the you determine which parameters to Time (Seconds) tune for and the best programming ThreadPool were manually tuned speFigure 4 Improvement Due to Manually Tuning the strategies to employ. Ongoing work cifically for this test application. ThreadPool The performance results are in Figfor future ThreadPool versions inure 4. The improvement (represented by the red line) is mainly a cludes trying to reduce the need to do manual tuning. result of adding more threads, which quickly increases the concurrency levels. In the ThreadPool (represented by the blue line), only ERIKA FUENTES, PhD, is a Program Manager on the CLR team where she works one thread is added when increasing concurrency levels is deemed on the Core Operating System in concurrency. She has several academic publications in the area of statistics, adaptive systems, and scientific computing. necessary—in this experiment the check happens every interval of ERIC EILEBRECHT is a Senior Software Development Engineer in the CLR team, 250ms. Moreover, after a certain point it concludes adding more where he works on the Core Operating System. He has been at Microsoft for 11 threads because there won’t be any further improvement. years and had worked on back-end storage systems for Hotmail prior to joining In this experiment, WorkItems are queued, each of which does the CLR team. CPU work then blocks for some amount of time. Every 30 seconds the blocking time is changed: in the first 30 seconds it lasts 1ms, then 2ms, then it switches back to 1ms. At the 90 second mark, the work is stopped for 10 seconds. After this, the previous blocking cycle continues. The blue line shows performance results using the existing ThreadPool. The red line shows the improvements obtained with manual tuning of this ThreadPool. Throughput (Completions/Seconds) Build interactive diagrams easier than you ever imagined A Final Note on Extracting Parallelism The introduction of parallelism can improve performance but is not trivial to incorporate parallel concepts and algorithms into existing applications. (For example, there are many pitfalls, as outlined in “Concurrency Hazards: Solving 11 Likely Problems in Your Multithreaded Code” at msdn.microsoft.com/magazine/cc817398.) The Task Parallel Libraries (TPL) are extensions to the .NET Framework, developed by the Parallel Computing Platform team, that provide a way to expose concurrency and provide support to take advantage of parallelism. The TPL are currently available, together with more information about this development, at msdn.microsoft.com/concurrency. C reate custom interactive diagrams, network editors, workflows, flow- charts and design tools. For web servers or local applications. It’s easy-to-use and very flexible. We’re the first developer of diagramming components and still the best. Find out for yourself: download our FREE fully functional evaluation kit, with full support at www.nwoods.com. Of course, taking advantage of exposed parallelism is still not seamless for the average programmer since there are still many factors that need to be taken into consideration. And as we saw in Figure 1, applications don’t always scale properly. The same is true when parallelizing a problem using divide-and-conquer techniques (recursive by nature). This can be tricky because these algorithms are a common source of deadlocks in the ThreadPool (which does not enable reentrant code). Finally, consider the usual case of a serial app that computes results in a certain order. When this applimsdnmagazine.com FREE Download With Full Support! Interactive diagram components www.nwoods.com December 2008 19 http://msdn.microsoft.com/magazine/cc817398 http://msdn.microsoft.com/concurrency http://msdn.microsoft.com/concurrency http://www.nwoods.com http://www.nwoods.com http://www.msdnmagazine.com
Table of Contents Feed for the Digital Edition of MSDN Magazine - December 2008 MSDN Magazine - December 2008 Contents Toolbox CLR Inside Out Advanced Basics Cutting Edge Patterns In Practice Team System Real-World WF Visual Studio OBA Tools SOA Data Access Geneva Framework Test Run Foundations Windows With C++ Going Places End Bracket MSDN Magazine - December 2008 MSDN Magazine - December 2008 - (Page Intro) MSDN Magazine - December 2008 - Contents (Page Cover1) MSDN Magazine - December 2008 - Contents (Page Cover2) MSDN Magazine - December 2008 - Contents (Page 1) MSDN Magazine - December 2008 - Contents (Page 2) MSDN Magazine - December 2008 - Contents (Page 3) MSDN Magazine - December 2008 - Contents (Page 4) MSDN Magazine - December 2008 - Contents (Page 5) MSDN Magazine - December 2008 - Contents (Page 6) MSDN Magazine - December 2008 - Contents (Page 7) MSDN Magazine - December 2008 - Contents (Page 8) MSDN Magazine - December 2008 - Contents (Page 9) MSDN Magazine - December 2008 - Contents (Page 10) MSDN Magazine - December 2008 - Toolbox (Page 11) MSDN Magazine - December 2008 - Toolbox (Page 12) MSDN Magazine - December 2008 - Toolbox (Page 13) MSDN Magazine - December 2008 - Toolbox (Page 14) MSDN Magazine - December 2008 - CLR Inside Out (Page 15) MSDN Magazine - December 2008 - CLR Inside Out (Page 16) MSDN Magazine - December 2008 - CLR Inside Out (Page 17) MSDN Magazine - December 2008 - CLR Inside Out (Page 18) MSDN Magazine - December 2008 - CLR Inside Out (Page 19) MSDN Magazine - December 2008 - CLR Inside Out (Page 20) MSDN Magazine - December 2008 - CLR Inside Out (Page 21) MSDN Magazine - December 2008 - Advanced Basics (Page 22) MSDN Magazine - December 2008 - Advanced Basics (Page 23) MSDN Magazine - December 2008 - Advanced Basics (Page 24) MSDN Magazine - December 2008 - Advanced Basics (Page 25) MSDN Magazine - December 2008 - Advanced Basics (Page 26) MSDN Magazine - December 2008 - Advanced Basics (Page 27) MSDN Magazine - December 2008 - Advanced Basics (Page 28) MSDN Magazine - December 2008 - Cutting Edge (Page 29) MSDN Magazine - December 2008 - Cutting Edge (Page 30) MSDN Magazine - December 2008 - Cutting Edge (Page 31) MSDN Magazine - December 2008 - Cutting Edge (Page 32) MSDN Magazine - December 2008 - Cutting Edge (Page 33) MSDN Magazine - December 2008 - Cutting Edge (Page 34) MSDN Magazine - December 2008 - Cutting Edge (Page 35) MSDN Magazine - December 2008 - Cutting Edge (Page 36) MSDN Magazine - December 2008 - Patterns In Practice (Page 37) MSDN Magazine - December 2008 - Patterns In Practice (Page 38) MSDN Magazine - December 2008 - Patterns In Practice (Page 39) MSDN Magazine - December 2008 - Patterns In Practice (Page 40) MSDN Magazine - December 2008 - Patterns In Practice (Page 41) MSDN Magazine - December 2008 - Patterns In Practice (Page 42) MSDN Magazine - December 2008 - Patterns In Practice (Page 43) MSDN Magazine - December 2008 - Team System (Page 44) MSDN Magazine - December 2008 - Team System (Page 45) MSDN Magazine - December 2008 - Team System (Page 46) MSDN Magazine - December 2008 - Team System (Page 47) MSDN Magazine - December 2008 - Team System (Page 48) MSDN Magazine - December 2008 - Team System (Page 49) MSDN Magazine - December 2008 - Team System (Page 50) MSDN Magazine - December 2008 - Team System (Page 51) MSDN Magazine - December 2008 - Real-World WF (Page 52) MSDN Magazine - December 2008 - Real-World WF (Page 53) MSDN Magazine - December 2008 - Real-World WF (Page 54) MSDN Magazine - December 2008 - Real-World WF (Page 55) MSDN Magazine - December 2008 - Real-World WF (Page 56) MSDN Magazine - December 2008 - Real-World WF (Page 57) MSDN Magazine - December 2008 - Real-World WF (Page 58) MSDN Magazine - December 2008 - Real-World WF (Page 59) MSDN Magazine - December 2008 - Real-World WF (Page 60) MSDN Magazine - December 2008 - Real-World WF (Page 61) MSDN Magazine - December 2008 - Visual Studio OBA Tools (Page 62) MSDN Magazine - December 2008 - Visual Studio OBA Tools (Page 63) MSDN Magazine - December 2008 - Visual Studio OBA Tools (Page 64) MSDN Magazine - December 2008 - Visual Studio OBA Tools (Page 65) MSDN Magazine - December 2008 - Visual Studio OBA Tools (Page 66) MSDN Magazine - December 2008 - Visual Studio OBA Tools (Page 67) MSDN Magazine - December 2008 - Visual Studio OBA Tools (Page 68) MSDN Magazine - December 2008 - Visual Studio OBA Tools (Page 69) MSDN Magazine - December 2008 - Visual Studio OBA Tools (Page 70) MSDN Magazine - December 2008 - Visual Studio OBA Tools (Page 71) MSDN Magazine - December 2008 - SOA Data Access (Page 72) MSDN Magazine - December 2008 - SOA Data Access (Page 73) MSDN Magazine - December 2008 - SOA Data Access (Page 74) MSDN Magazine - December 2008 - SOA Data Access (Page 75) MSDN Magazine - December 2008 - SOA Data Access (Page 76) MSDN Magazine - December 2008 - SOA Data Access (Page 77) MSDN Magazine - December 2008 - SOA Data Access (Page 78) MSDN Magazine - December 2008 - SOA Data Access (Page 79) MSDN Magazine - December 2008 - SOA Data Access (Page 80) MSDN Magazine - December 2008 - SOA Data Access (Page 81) MSDN Magazine - December 2008 - Geneva Framework (Page 82) MSDN Magazine - December 2008 - Geneva Framework (Page 83) MSDN Magazine - December 2008 - Geneva Framework (Page 84) MSDN Magazine - December 2008 - Geneva Framework (Page 85) MSDN Magazine - December 2008 - Geneva Framework (Page 86) MSDN Magazine - December 2008 - Geneva Framework (Page 87) MSDN Magazine - December 2008 - Geneva Framework (Page 88) MSDN Magazine - December 2008 - Geneva Framework (Page 89) MSDN Magazine - December 2008 - Geneva Framework (Page 90) MSDN Magazine - December 2008 - Test Run (Page 91) MSDN Magazine - December 2008 - Test Run (Page 92) MSDN Magazine - December 2008 - Test Run (Page 93) MSDN Magazine - December 2008 - Test Run (Page 94) MSDN Magazine - December 2008 - Test Run (Page 95) MSDN Magazine - December 2008 - Test Run (Page 96) MSDN Magazine - December 2008 - Test Run (Page 97) MSDN Magazine - December 2008 - Test Run (Page 98) MSDN Magazine - December 2008 - Test Run (Page 99) MSDN Magazine - December 2008 - Test Run (Page 100) MSDN Magazine - December 2008 - Foundations (Page 101) MSDN Magazine - December 2008 - Foundations (Page 102) MSDN Magazine - December 2008 - Foundations (Page 103) MSDN Magazine - December 2008 - Foundations (Page 104) MSDN Magazine - December 2008 - Foundations (Page 105) MSDN Magazine - December 2008 - Foundations (Page 106) MSDN Magazine - December 2008 - Foundations (Page 107) MSDN Magazine - December 2008 - Foundations (Page 108) MSDN Magazine - December 2008 - Windows With C++ (Page 109) MSDN Magazine - December 2008 - Windows With C++ (Page 110) MSDN Magazine - December 2008 - Windows With C++ (Page 111) MSDN Magazine - December 2008 - Windows With C++ (Page 112) MSDN Magazine - December 2008 - Going Places (Page 113) MSDN Magazine - December 2008 - Going Places (Page 114) MSDN Magazine - December 2008 - Going Places (Page 115) MSDN Magazine - December 2008 - Going Places (Page 116) MSDN Magazine - December 2008 - Going Places (Page 117) MSDN Magazine - December 2008 - Going Places (Page 118) MSDN Magazine - December 2008 - Going Places (Page 119) MSDN Magazine - December 2008 - End Bracket (Page 120) MSDN Magazine - December 2008 - End Bracket (Page Cover3) MSDN Magazine - December 2008 - End Bracket (Page Cover4)
For optimal viewing of this digital publication, please enable JavaScript and then refresh the page. If you would like to try to load the digital publication without using Flash Player detection, please click here.