Physician's Practice - November 2008 - (Page 65) CODING YOUR TOP CODING CONCERNS SOLVED DEFINING WHEN CANCER TURNS TO HISTORY OF CANCER; CODING RIGHT FOR CANCER BY BILL DACEY What is the appropriate diagnosis code for a patient being “followed” for a previous cancer when there is no known residual malignancy? It doesn’t really make sense to code for the cancer since it doesn’t exist, really, but cancer is still the reason for the visit. And when should the diagnosis code cease to be reported as a “neoplasm” and begin to be reported as “history of a malignant neoplasm of XXX”? site is coded as a secondary malignant neoplasm to that site. The secondary site may be the principal or first-listed with the V10 code used as a secondary code.” But what about when there is no further treatment directed at that site but there is some evidence of disease? What if there were margins present when the neoplasm was excised? What if a PSA indicates Active cancer may be reported for a patient with cancer who is not receiving active treatment, but may be receiving treatment for symptoms. For example, a patient with brain cancer receiving hospice care is coded as active cancer 191.9B. Use personal history (V-codes) when: • There is no evidence of any existing primary malignancy • The primary malignancy has been excised or eradicated When should the diagnosis code cease to be reported as a “neoplasm” and begin to be reported as “history of a malignant neoplasm of XXX”? CODING CONUNDRUM That’s just the start of the mystery. One article from a Medicare carrier Web site suggests the use of V-codes for patients who have no known residual tumor but are receiving medically necessary follow-up care because of a past malignancy. But do they mean the Vcode as in “history of” or the b-type version of a V-code that requires there is “treatment being provided”? The instructions from the ICD-9-CM Official Guidelines for Coding and Reporting, page 24, seem clear at first: “When a primary malignancy has been previously excised or eradicated from its site and there is no further treatment directed to that site and there is no evidence of any existing primary malignancy, a code from category V10, Personal history of malignant neoplasm, should be used to indicate the former site of the malignancy. Any mention of extension, invasion, or metastasis to another WWW.PHYSICIANSPRACTICE.COM • There is no adjuvant treatment, chemotherapy, or radiotherapy directed to that site • There is no evidence of recurrence of the primary malignancy If the documentation states there is “no evidence of disease,” use a personal history code or V-code. Here’s an example: A patient had breast cancer 10 years ago and had a radical mastectomy. She is no longer receiving any treatment and the documentation indicates that there is no evidence of disease. Report a personal history of breast cancer: V10.3A. Use “family history of neoplasm” for patients without cancer but with a family history of cancer. You can also use this term for preventive Tamoxifen trials in high-risk women. When in doubt, contact your carriers or payers directly. You don’t want to code for cancer that, in retrospect, a payer decides did not exist. some cells are present, even if the number is extremely low? Is there not a version of physician management that consists of watchful waiting, review-of-systems questions for years, and increased frequency of diagnostic testing directed at potential recurrence or activity? There is not real clarity to any of these issues; we’d love to hear how you handle them. In the meantime, here are cancerrelated issues that are clear. CODING RIGHT FOR CANCER • Cancers with documentation stated as “History of XXX cancer on current adjuvant therapy or other active treatments” should be coded as active cancer. For example, a patient with history of breast cancer on adjuvant therapy should be coded as active breast cancer 174.9D. Bill Dacey, CPC, MBA, MHA, is principal in the Dacey Group, a consulting firm dedicated to coding, billing, documentation, and compliance concerns. Dacey is a PMCC-certified instructor and has been active in physician training for more than 18 years. He can be reached via editor@physicianspractice.com. NOVEMBER 2008 | PHYSICIANS PRACTICE | 65 http://WWW.PHYSICIANSPRACTICE.COM
Table of Contents Feed for the Digital Edition of Physician's Practice - November 2008 Physician's Practice - November 2008 Contents Death of Solo Practice Just a Myth Letters HSAy What? Noteworthy Finding Lost Revenue: The Search for Billing and Coding Gold Getting More: Our Annual Physician Compensation Survey ’Tis the Season to be Neutral Ask the Experts Evaluating Paperless Labs HR in a Box? The Guide Coding Third-Party Audits on the Rise Branding the Cash-Only Practice Intra-Office Tug-of-Wars Stickin‘ Up For Yourself Classifieds Advertiser Index Physician's Practice - November 2008 Physician's Practice - November 2008 - Physician's Practice - November 2008 (Page Cover1) Physician's Practice - November 2008 - Physician's Practice - November 2008 (Page Cover2) Physician's Practice - November 2008 - Physician's Practice - November 2008 (Page 1) Physician's Practice - November 2008 - Physician's Practice - November 2008 (Page 2) Physician's Practice - November 2008 - Physician's Practice - November 2008 (Page 3) Physician's Practice - November 2008 - Physician's Practice - November 2008 (Page 4) Physician's Practice - November 2008 - Contents (Page 5) Physician's Practice - November 2008 - Contents (Page 6) Physician's Practice - November 2008 - Contents (Page 7) Physician's Practice - November 2008 - Contents (Page 8) Physician's Practice - November 2008 - Contents (Page 9) Physician's Practice - November 2008 - Death of Solo Practice Just a Myth (Page 10) Physician's Practice - November 2008 - Death of Solo Practice Just a Myth (Page 11) Physician's Practice - November 2008 - Letters (Page 12) Physician's Practice - November 2008 - Letters (Page 13) Physician's Practice - November 2008 - Letters (Page 14) Physician's Practice - November 2008 - Letters (Page 15) Physician's Practice - November 2008 - Letters (Page 16) Physician's Practice - November 2008 - Letters (Page 17) Physician's Practice - November 2008 - HSAy What? (Page 18) Physician's Practice - November 2008 - HSAy What? (Page 19) Physician's Practice - November 2008 - Noteworthy (Page 20) Physician's Practice - November 2008 - Noteworthy (Page 21) Physician's Practice - November 2008 - Noteworthy (Page 22) Physician's Practice - November 2008 - Noteworthy (Page 23) Physician's Practice - November 2008 - Noteworthy (Page 24) Physician's Practice - November 2008 - Noteworthy (Page 25) Physician's Practice - November 2008 - Finding Lost Revenue: The Search for Billing and Coding Gold (Page 26) Physician's Practice - November 2008 - Finding Lost Revenue: The Search for Billing and Coding Gold (Page 27) Physician's Practice - November 2008 - Finding Lost Revenue: The Search for Billing and Coding Gold (Page 28) Physician's Practice - November 2008 - Finding Lost Revenue: The Search for Billing and Coding Gold (Page 29) Physician's Practice - November 2008 - Finding Lost Revenue: The Search for Billing and Coding Gold (Page 30) Physician's Practice - November 2008 - Finding Lost Revenue: The Search for Billing and Coding Gold (Page 31) Physician's Practice - November 2008 - Finding Lost Revenue: The Search for Billing and Coding Gold (Page 32) Physician's Practice - November 2008 - Finding Lost Revenue: The Search for Billing and Coding Gold (Page 33) Physician's Practice - November 2008 - Finding Lost Revenue: The Search for Billing and Coding Gold (Page 34) Physician's Practice - November 2008 - Finding Lost Revenue: The Search for Billing and Coding Gold (Page 35) Physician's Practice - November 2008 - Finding Lost Revenue: The Search for Billing and Coding Gold (Page 36) Physician's Practice - November 2008 - Finding Lost Revenue: The Search for Billing and Coding Gold (Page 37) Physician's Practice - November 2008 - Getting More: Our Annual Physician Compensation Survey (Page 38) Physician's Practice - November 2008 - Getting More: Our Annual Physician Compensation Survey (Page 39) Physician's Practice - November 2008 - Getting More: Our Annual Physician Compensation Survey (Page 40) Physician's Practice - November 2008 - Getting More: Our Annual Physician Compensation Survey (Page 41) Physician's Practice - November 2008 - Getting More: Our Annual Physician Compensation Survey (Page 42) Physician's Practice - November 2008 - Getting More: Our Annual Physician Compensation Survey (Page 43) Physician's Practice - November 2008 - Getting More: Our Annual Physician Compensation Survey (Page 44) Physician's Practice - November 2008 - Getting More: Our Annual Physician Compensation Survey (Page 45) Physician's Practice - November 2008 - Getting More: Our Annual Physician Compensation Survey (Page 46) Physician's Practice - November 2008 - ’Tis the Season to be Neutral (Page 47) Physician's Practice - November 2008 - ’Tis the Season to be Neutral (Page 48) Physician's Practice - November 2008 - Ask the Experts (Page 49) Physician's Practice - November 2008 - Ask the Experts (Page 50) Physician's Practice - November 2008 - Ask the Experts (Page 51) Physician's Practice - November 2008 - Ask the Experts (Page 52) Physician's Practice - November 2008 - Ask the Experts (Page 53) Physician's Practice - November 2008 - Ask the Experts (Page 54) Physician's Practice - November 2008 - Evaluating Paperless Labs (Page 55) Physician's Practice - November 2008 - Evaluating Paperless Labs (Page 56) Physician's Practice - November 2008 - HR in a Box? (Page 57) Physician's Practice - November 2008 - HR in a Box? (Page 58) Physician's Practice - November 2008 - HR in a Box? (Page 59) Physician's Practice - November 2008 - HR in a Box? (Page 60) Physician's Practice - November 2008 - The Guide (Page 61) Physician's Practice - November 2008 - The Guide (Page 62) Physician's Practice - November 2008 - The Guide (Page 63) Physician's Practice - November 2008 - The Guide (Page 64) Physician's Practice - November 2008 - Coding (Page 65) Physician's Practice - November 2008 - Coding (Page 66) Physician's Practice - November 2008 - Third-Party Audits on the Rise (Page 67) Physician's Practice - November 2008 - Third-Party Audits on the Rise (Page 68) Physician's Practice - November 2008 - Third-Party Audits on the Rise (Page 69) Physician's Practice - November 2008 - Third-Party Audits on the Rise (Page 70) Physician's Practice - November 2008 - Branding the Cash-Only Practice (Page 71) Physician's Practice - November 2008 - Branding the Cash-Only Practice (Page 72) Physician's Practice - November 2008 - Branding the Cash-Only Practice (Page 73) Physician's Practice - November 2008 - Branding the Cash-Only Practice (Page 74) Physician's Practice - November 2008 - Intra-Office Tug-of-Wars (Page 75) Physician's Practice - November 2008 - Intra-Office Tug-of-Wars (Page 76) Physician's Practice - November 2008 - Intra-Office Tug-of-Wars (Page 77) Physician's Practice - November 2008 - Intra-Office Tug-of-Wars (Page 78) Physician's Practice - November 2008 - Stickin‘ Up For Yourself (Page 79) Physician's Practice - November 2008 - Stickin‘ Up For Yourself (Page 80) Physician's Practice - November 2008 - Stickin‘ Up For Yourself (Page 81) Physician's Practice - November 2008 - Classifieds (Page 82) Physician's Practice - November 2008 - Classifieds (Page 83) Physician's Practice - November 2008 - Classifieds (Page 84) Physician's Practice - November 2008 - Classifieds (Page 85) Physician's Practice - November 2008 - Classifieds (Page 86) Physician's Practice - November 2008 - Classifieds (Page 87) Physician's Practice - November 2008 - Advertiser Index (Page 88) Physician's Practice - November 2008 - Advertiser Index (Page Cover3) Physician's Practice - November 2008 - Advertiser Index (Page Cover4)
For optimal viewing of this digital publication, please enable JavaScript and then refresh the page. If you would like to try to load the digital publication without using Flash Player detection, please click here.