Conformity Magazine - June 2008 - (Page 53) • Operating conditions (environment); • If high resistivity is required because of multiple turns, • The circuit impedance, source and load; • How much attenuation is required; • The allowable space on the board. The design engineer can then compare materials at the relevant frequencies for the complex permeability, heeding effects of temperature and field strength. After this, core geometry can be selected, from which the inductive reactance and series resistance can be defined. The Equations The impedance of a ferrite core in terms of permeability is given by: Z = jωµ Lo And: µ = µ' - jµ" =(µs'2 +(jµs")2)1/2 Where: µ'= real part of the complex permeability µ"= imaginary part of the complex permeability j = unit imaginary vector Lo= the air core inductance Therefore: Z = j ωLo (µ' − jµ") Equation 5 Equation 4 Equation 3 conductor pins in a connector filter plate or position in the circuit; At low frequencies, the impedance of the component is primarily the inductive reactance. As frequency increases, the inductance decreases at the same time the losses increase and the total impedance increases. Figure 4 is a typical curve of XL, Rs and Z vs. frequency for our a medium permeability material. Knowing that, the magnetic quality factor: Q = µ'/µ" = ωLs/Rs Equation 8 Then, the inductive reactance is made directly proportional to the real part of the complex permeability by Lo, the air core inductance: j ωLs= j ωLoµs' The loss resistance is also made directly proportional to the imaginary part of the complex permeability by the same constant: Rs= ωLoµs" Substituting into Equation 7 for impedance: Ζ = ωLoµs" + j ωLoµs' The impedance of the core is also considered to be a series combination of inductive reactance (XL) and the loss resistance (Rs), both of which are frequency dependent. A loss free core would have an impedance that would be given by the reactance: X = j ωLs Equation 6 A core that has magnetic losses may be represented as having an impedance: Z = Rs + j ωLs Where: Rs= total series resistance =Rm + Re Rm = Equivalent series resistance due to the magnetic losses Re = equivalent series resistance for copper losses JUNE 2008 CoNformity 53 Equation 7 http://www.captorcorp.com http://www.captorcorp.com http://www.captorcorp.com
Table of Contents Feed for the Digital Edition of Conformity - June 2008 Conformity - June 2008 Contents Editor's Note 700 MHz Auction Raises a Record $20 Billion FCC Modifies PCS and AWS Power Limit Rules for Broadband Wireless Commission Designates Spectrum Test Bed FCC Releases Report on Wireless Competition Commission Proposes $5 Million Fine for Slamming Using EDX for Non-Destructive Detection of Lead in Consumer Products ESD Open Forum Challenges in Testing - Improving Election Security and Accuracy Part 1 Challenges in Testing - Human Body Model: The Hidden Challenges High-Speed Signal Integrity Considerations for ESD Components Focus On...EMC Components Buyer's Guide FCC Levies $2.6 Million Fine for Junk Faxes FDA Updates Guidance on its Product Review Process EU Issues Updated Energy Star Regulations EU Repeals Directive on Veterinary Electro-Medical Equipment New Product Announcements Updated Standards List for the EU's PPE Directive CPSC Announces New Effort to Keep Out Hazardous Products CPSC Actions in the News IEC Standards Update UL Standards Update Product Reviews Telcordia Standards Update From Our "You Can't Make This Stuff Up" Department Looking Back: Items from Past Issues of Conformity Advertisers Conformity - June 2008 Conformity - June 2008 - Conformity - June 2008 (Page Cover1) Conformity - June 2008 - Conformity - June 2008 (Page Cover2) Conformity - June 2008 - Conformity - June 2008 (Page 3) Conformity - June 2008 - Contents (Page 4) Conformity - June 2008 - Contents (Page 5) Conformity - June 2008 - Editor's Note (Page 6) Conformity - June 2008 - Editor's Note (Page 7) Conformity - June 2008 - Editor's Note (Page 8) Conformity - June 2008 - Editor's Note (Page 9) Conformity - June 2008 - Commission Designates Spectrum Test Bed (Page 10) Conformity - June 2008 - Commission Proposes $5 Million Fine for Slamming (Page 11) Conformity - June 2008 - Using EDX for Non-Destructive Detection of Lead in Consumer Products (Page 12) Conformity - June 2008 - Using EDX for Non-Destructive Detection of Lead in Consumer Products (Page 13) Conformity - June 2008 - Using EDX for Non-Destructive Detection of Lead in Consumer Products (Page 14) Conformity - June 2008 - Using EDX for Non-Destructive Detection of Lead in Consumer Products (Page 15) Conformity - June 2008 - Using EDX for Non-Destructive Detection of Lead in Consumer Products (Page 16) Conformity - June 2008 - Using EDX for Non-Destructive Detection of Lead in Consumer Products (Page 17) Conformity - June 2008 - Using EDX for Non-Destructive Detection of Lead in Consumer Products (Page 18) Conformity - June 2008 - Using EDX for Non-Destructive Detection of Lead in Consumer Products (Page 19) Conformity - June 2008 - Using EDX for Non-Destructive Detection of Lead in Consumer Products (Page 20) Conformity - June 2008 - Using EDX for Non-Destructive Detection of Lead in Consumer Products (Page 21) Conformity - June 2008 - ESD Open Forum (Page 22) Conformity - June 2008 - ESD Open Forum (Page 23) Conformity - June 2008 - Challenges in Testing - Improving Election Security and Accuracy Part 1 (Page 24) Conformity - June 2008 - Challenges in Testing - Improving Election Security and Accuracy Part 1 (Page 25) Conformity - June 2008 - Challenges in Testing - Improving Election Security and Accuracy Part 1 (Page 26) Conformity - June 2008 - Challenges in Testing - Improving Election Security and Accuracy Part 1 (Page 27) Conformity - June 2008 - Challenges in Testing - Improving Election Security and Accuracy Part 1 (Page 28) Conformity - June 2008 - Challenges in Testing - Improving Election Security and Accuracy Part 1 (Page 29) Conformity - June 2008 - Challenges in Testing - Improving Election Security and Accuracy Part 1 (Page 30) Conformity - June 2008 - Challenges in Testing - Improving Election Security and Accuracy Part 1 (Page 31) Conformity - June 2008 - Challenges in Testing - Human Body Model: The Hidden Challenges (Page 32) Conformity - June 2008 - Challenges in Testing - Human Body Model: The Hidden Challenges (Page 33) Conformity - June 2008 - Challenges in Testing - Human Body Model: The Hidden Challenges (Page 34) Conformity - June 2008 - Challenges in Testing - Human Body Model: The Hidden Challenges (Page 35) Conformity - June 2008 - Challenges in Testing - Human Body Model: The Hidden Challenges (Page 36) Conformity - June 2008 - Challenges in Testing - Human Body Model: The Hidden Challenges (Page 37) Conformity - June 2008 - Challenges in Testing - Human Body Model: The Hidden Challenges (Page 38) Conformity - June 2008 - Challenges in Testing - Human Body Model: The Hidden Challenges (Page 39) Conformity - June 2008 - High-Speed Signal Integrity Considerations for ESD Components (Page 40) Conformity - June 2008 - High-Speed Signal Integrity Considerations for ESD Components (Page 41) Conformity - June 2008 - High-Speed Signal Integrity Considerations for ESD Components (Page 42) Conformity - June 2008 - High-Speed Signal Integrity Considerations for ESD Components (Page 43) Conformity - June 2008 - High-Speed Signal Integrity Considerations for ESD Components (Page 44) Conformity - June 2008 - High-Speed Signal Integrity Considerations for ESD Components (Page 45) Conformity - June 2008 - High-Speed Signal Integrity Considerations for ESD Components (Page 46) Conformity - June 2008 - High-Speed Signal Integrity Considerations for ESD Components (Page 47) Conformity - June 2008 - High-Speed Signal Integrity Considerations for ESD Components (Page 48) Conformity - June 2008 - High-Speed Signal Integrity Considerations for ESD Components (Page 49) Conformity - June 2008 - Focus On...EMC Components (Page 50) Conformity - June 2008 - Focus On...EMC Components (Page 51) Conformity - June 2008 - Focus On...EMC Components (Page 52) Conformity - June 2008 - Focus On...EMC Components (Page 53) Conformity - June 2008 - Focus On...EMC Components (Page 54) Conformity - June 2008 - Focus On...EMC Components (Page 55) Conformity - June 2008 - Focus On...EMC Components (Page 56) Conformity - June 2008 - Focus On...EMC Components (Page 57) Conformity - June 2008 - Focus On...EMC Components (Page 58) Conformity - June 2008 - Focus On...EMC Components (Page 59) Conformity - June 2008 - Buyer's Guide (Page 60) Conformity - June 2008 - Buyer's Guide (Page 61) Conformity - June 2008 - Buyer's Guide (Page 62) Conformity - June 2008 - Buyer's Guide (Page 63) Conformity - June 2008 - Buyer's Guide (Page 64) Conformity - June 2008 - Buyer's Guide (Page 65) Conformity - June 2008 - Buyer's Guide (Page 66) Conformity - June 2008 - Buyer's Guide (Page 67) Conformity - June 2008 - Buyer's Guide (Page 68) Conformity - June 2008 - Buyer's Guide (Page 69) Conformity - June 2008 - Buyer's Guide (Page 70) Conformity - June 2008 - Buyer's Guide (Page 71) Conformity - June 2008 - Buyer's Guide (Page 72) Conformity - June 2008 - Buyer's Guide (Page 73) Conformity - June 2008 - Buyer's Guide (Page 74) Conformity - June 2008 - Buyer's Guide (Page 75) Conformity - June 2008 - EU Repeals Directive on Veterinary Electro-Medical Equipment (Page 76) Conformity - June 2008 - New Product Announcements (Page 77) Conformity - June 2008 - CPSC Actions in the News (Page 78) Conformity - June 2008 - IEC Standards Update (Page 79) Conformity - June 2008 - UL Standards Update (Page 80) Conformity - June 2008 - Looking Back: Items from Past Issues of Conformity (Page 81) Conformity - June 2008 - Advertisers (Page 82) Conformity - June 2008 - Advertisers (Page Cover3) Conformity - June 2008 - Advertisers (Page Cover4)
For optimal viewing of this digital publication, please enable JavaScript and then refresh the page. If you would like to try to load the digital publication without using Flash Player detection, please click here.