Conformity Magazine - July 2008 - (Page 40) where: F = Noise figure power ratio Si = Input signal power Ni = Input noise power So = Output signal power No = Output noise power This expression can be simplified for a spectrum analyzer or EMI receiver. First, the output signal is the input signal times the gain of the instrument. Second, the gain of the instrument is unity because the signal level at the output (indicated on the display) is the same as the level at the input (input connector). With these assumptions, the equation becomes: No F= Equation 3 Ni This means that the determination of the noise figure can be reduced to a simple comparison of the noise level displayed by the instrument to the “true” – not the effective – noise level at the input of the instrument. Equation 3 can be expressed in logarithmic terms as: NF = 10 * log(F) = 10 * log(No) – 10 * log(Ni) Equation 4 In order to determine the noise figure, the noise power has to be measured in some bandwidth, normalize this value to a 1Hz bandwidth and compare it to -174 dBm/Hz. Example: if a noise signal of -110 dBm was measured in a 10 kHz bandwidth, the noise figure would be determined as follows: NF = [measured noise in dBm] – 10 * log = –110 dBm – 10 * log = 24 dB The noise figure of 24 dB noise figure means that a sinusoidal signal must be 24 dB above kTB to be equal to the displayed average noise level on this particular instrument. Thus, the noise figure can be used to determine the DANL for a given bandwidth or to compare the DANL of different instruments. Preamplifiers The noise figure concept aids in the determination of the possible benefit of using a preamplifier in the test system. A 24 dB noise figure, while reasonable for a general purpose spectrum analyzer, is not adequate for radiated emission measurements. However, by placing an appropriate preamplifier in front of the spectrum analyzer or EMI receiver, a system (preamplifier/spectrum analyzer) noise figure can be obtained that is lower than that of the spectrum analyzer itself. To the extent that the noise figure is lowered, the system sensitivity is improved as well. The concept of noise figure was introduced on the basis of sinusoidal input signals. The benefits of a preamplifier can be determined on the same basis. However, a preamplifier also amplifies noise, and this output noise can be higher than the effective input noise of the analyzer. A spectrum analyzer or EMI receiver using log power averaging displays a random noise signal 2.5 dB lower than its actual value. The following derivations will take this fact into consideration by introducing a suitable correction factor. () 10000 1 () RBW 1Hz – kTBB = 1Hz – (–174 dBm) Equation 5 The true noise level at the instrument input, rather than the effective noise level, is to be used because the input signal-tonoise ratio is based on the true noise. As shown above, when the input is terminated in 50 Ω, the kTB noise level at room temperature in a 1 Hz bandwidth is -174 dBm. Figure 3: Preamplifier impact on dynamic range 0 Conformity JULy 2008
Table of Contents Feed for the Digital Edition of Conformity Magazine - July 2008 Conformity Magazine - July 2008 Contents Editor's Note FCC Adopts 6 Million Dollars in DTV Enforcement Orders Commission Enforcement Bureau Adopts V-Chip Consent Decree FDA Seeks 2 Million Dollars from Medical Device Manufacturer FDA Answers Questions About CFLs and UV Radiation EPA Issues Energy Star Specs for TV, Video Boxes Canada Unveils Sweeping Product Safety Legislation How the Evolution of CISPR Standards Continues to Shape the Requirements for Anechoic Chambers ESD Open Forum Reach Compliance for Non-EU Article Manufacturers The iNARTE Informer Preamplifier Considerations for Emission Measurement Systems Effective Shielding in Medical Electronics Applications Product News Focus On...Power Components Buyer's Guide Updated Standards List for the EU's ATEX Directive EOS/ESD Symposium Set for September CPSC Actions in the News Researchers Work to Develop Non-Flammable Batteries Safety Link Launches Redesigned, Enhanced Web Site IEC Standards Update UL Standards Update Product Reviews Telcordia Standards Update From Our "You Can't Make This Stuff Up" Department Looking Back: Items from Past Issues of Conformity Advertisers Conformity Magazine - July 2008 Conformity Magazine - July 2008 - Conformity Magazine - July 2008 (Page Cover1) Conformity Magazine - July 2008 - Conformity Magazine - July 2008 (Page Cover2) Conformity Magazine - July 2008 - Conformity Magazine - July 2008 (Page 3) Conformity Magazine - July 2008 - Contents (Page 4) Conformity Magazine - July 2008 - Contents (Page 5) Conformity Magazine - July 2008 - Editor's Note (Page 6) Conformity Magazine - July 2008 - Editor's Note (Page 7) Conformity Magazine - July 2008 - Editor's Note (Page 8) Conformity Magazine - July 2008 - Editor's Note (Page 9) Conformity Magazine - July 2008 - FDA Seeks 2 Million Dollars from Medical Device Manufacturer (Page 10) Conformity Magazine - July 2008 - Canada Unveils Sweeping Product Safety Legislation (Page 11) Conformity Magazine - July 2008 - How the Evolution of CISPR Standards Continues to Shape the Requirements for Anechoic Chambers (Page 12) Conformity Magazine - July 2008 - How the Evolution of CISPR Standards Continues to Shape the Requirements for Anechoic Chambers (Page 13) Conformity Magazine - July 2008 - How the Evolution of CISPR Standards Continues to Shape the Requirements for Anechoic Chambers (Page 14) Conformity Magazine - July 2008 - How the Evolution of CISPR Standards Continues to Shape the Requirements for Anechoic Chambers (Page 15) Conformity Magazine - July 2008 - How the Evolution of CISPR Standards Continues to Shape the Requirements for Anechoic Chambers (Page 16) Conformity Magazine - July 2008 - How the Evolution of CISPR Standards Continues to Shape the Requirements for Anechoic Chambers (Page 17) Conformity Magazine - July 2008 - How the Evolution of CISPR Standards Continues to Shape the Requirements for Anechoic Chambers (Page 18) Conformity Magazine - July 2008 - How the Evolution of CISPR Standards Continues to Shape the Requirements for Anechoic Chambers (Page 19) Conformity Magazine - July 2008 - How the Evolution of CISPR Standards Continues to Shape the Requirements for Anechoic Chambers (Page 20) Conformity Magazine - July 2008 - How the Evolution of CISPR Standards Continues to Shape the Requirements for Anechoic Chambers (Page 21) Conformity Magazine - July 2008 - How the Evolution of CISPR Standards Continues to Shape the Requirements for Anechoic Chambers (Page 22) Conformity Magazine - July 2008 - How the Evolution of CISPR Standards Continues to Shape the Requirements for Anechoic Chambers (Page 23) Conformity Magazine - July 2008 - How the Evolution of CISPR Standards Continues to Shape the Requirements for Anechoic Chambers (Page 24) Conformity Magazine - July 2008 - How the Evolution of CISPR Standards Continues to Shape the Requirements for Anechoic Chambers (Page 25) Conformity Magazine - July 2008 - ESD Open Forum (Page 26) Conformity Magazine - July 2008 - ESD Open Forum (Page 27) Conformity Magazine - July 2008 - Reach Compliance for Non-EU Article Manufacturers (Page 28) Conformity Magazine - July 2008 - Reach Compliance for Non-EU Article Manufacturers (Page 29) Conformity Magazine - July 2008 - Reach Compliance for Non-EU Article Manufacturers (Page 30) Conformity Magazine - July 2008 - Reach Compliance for Non-EU Article Manufacturers (Page 31) Conformity Magazine - July 2008 - Reach Compliance for Non-EU Article Manufacturers (Page 32) Conformity Magazine - July 2008 - Reach Compliance for Non-EU Article Manufacturers (Page 33) Conformity Magazine - July 2008 - The iNARTE Informer (Page 34) Conformity Magazine - July 2008 - The iNARTE Informer (Page 35) Conformity Magazine - July 2008 - Preamplifier Considerations for Emission Measurement Systems (Page 36) Conformity Magazine - July 2008 - Preamplifier Considerations for Emission Measurement Systems (Page 37) Conformity Magazine - July 2008 - Preamplifier Considerations for Emission Measurement Systems (Page 38) Conformity Magazine - July 2008 - Preamplifier Considerations for Emission Measurement Systems (Page 39) Conformity Magazine - July 2008 - Preamplifier Considerations for Emission Measurement Systems (Page 40) Conformity Magazine - July 2008 - Preamplifier Considerations for Emission Measurement Systems (Page 41) Conformity Magazine - July 2008 - Preamplifier Considerations for Emission Measurement Systems (Page 42) Conformity Magazine - July 2008 - Preamplifier Considerations for Emission Measurement Systems (Page 43) Conformity Magazine - July 2008 - Effective Shielding in Medical Electronics Applications (Page 44) Conformity Magazine - July 2008 - Effective Shielding in Medical Electronics Applications (Page 45) Conformity Magazine - July 2008 - Effective Shielding in Medical Electronics Applications (Page 46) Conformity Magazine - July 2008 - Effective Shielding in Medical Electronics Applications (Page 47) Conformity Magazine - July 2008 - Effective Shielding in Medical Electronics Applications (Page 48) Conformity Magazine - July 2008 - Product News (Page 49) Conformity Magazine - July 2008 - Focus On...Power Components (Page 50) Conformity Magazine - July 2008 - Focus On...Power Components (Page 51) Conformity Magazine - July 2008 - Focus On...Power Components (Page 52) Conformity Magazine - July 2008 - Focus On...Power Components (Page 53) Conformity Magazine - July 2008 - Buyer's Guide (Page 54) Conformity Magazine - July 2008 - Buyer's Guide (Page 55) Conformity Magazine - July 2008 - Buyer's Guide (Page 56) Conformity Magazine - July 2008 - Buyer's Guide (Page 57) Conformity Magazine - July 2008 - CPSC Actions in the News (Page 58) Conformity Magazine - July 2008 - Product Reviews (Page 59) Conformity Magazine - July 2008 - Product Reviews (Page 60) Conformity Magazine - July 2008 - Looking Back: Items from Past Issues of Conformity (Page 61) Conformity Magazine - July 2008 - Advertisers (Page 62) Conformity Magazine - July 2008 - Advertisers (Page Cover3) Conformity Magazine - July 2008 - Advertisers (Page Cover4)
For optimal viewing of this digital publication, please enable JavaScript and then refresh the page. If you would like to try to load the digital publication without using Flash Player detection, please click here.