CRM - January 2009 - (Page 8) FEEDBACK Home Is Where It’s At T HOUGH THE ARTICLE “There’s No Place Like Home” (October 2008, http://snurl.com/1008musico) is quite informative from an agent’s perspective about the opportunity to balance personal life with work life, what’s missing is the analysis from the company and customer perspectives. Agreed, the agents enjoy the advantage of working flexible hours, and attending to their kids, but there is no mention as to what adequate care is taken to sustain (if not enhance) the customer experience. It’s a great thing to generate employment for the physically challenged, but will the customer take the sound of a television running/ kid crying or yelling in the background as he seeks assistance from an agent? Similarly, just like customer experience, it is equally important to evaluate the datasecurity issue: It would be very difficult to manage security once the data is already being accessed from the agent’s residence, and it would be nearly impossible to monitor data-theft problems. “Work-at-home agent” sounds good, but an effort to delve more deeply into the above-mentioned areas would go a long way toward making this article even more informative. Ashutosh Thatte ashutosh.thatte@yahoo.co.in you’re right on the money: Today, a good software-as-a-service (SaaS) CRM consultant—and consultancy—is far less about the technology and all about the specific business process and industry extensions that can fit on the SaaS product framework. Think Salesforce.com and its AppExchange, NetSuite and its recent OpenAir acquisition. David Boulanger Research Dir., Customer Management Strategies, Aberdeen Group david.boulanger@aberdeen.com Building a Better Business Architect R E G A R D I N G your recent online story (“The Buzz Around Business Architecture,” October 27, http://snurl.com/Jan09feedback1), Forrester’s reports are nice, but fundamentally flawed in understanding the business part of business architecture (BA). Business architect is not an IT role. The fact that it’s seen as one has been the problem. Interestingly, Forrester and Gartner have been absent at the major forums and discussion groups trying to better define the BA space. Greg Suddreth greg@bizarchcommunity.com BUSINESS ARCHITECTURE should be discussed without hardly ever mentioning information technology. When the primary goal for a BA is “to improve alignment between IT and the business” then the resulting BA will almost surely be tainted because it will be developed with a bias for IT. Obviously a BA can be used to improve IT (primarily as one of the four architectures that constitute an enterprise architecture), but it should be equally useful as a tool to all other parts of the organization— just as valuable in “improving alignment” between HR and the business or marketing and the business. A BA will be IT-biased whenever IT is frequently mentioned but other units are not. BAs should be truly of and for the entire enterprise, in which IT is just one of many functional units, no less or greater than any of the others. Dean Larson dlarson@safenetconsulting.com Editorial Assistant Christopher Musico responds: Thanks for your insights. Regarding data security, I agree that it’s an integral concern for work-at-home agents (WAHAs). In fact, we did a story back in June (http://snurl.com/4khc4) about agent-desktop security. The reason I didn’t include security in the magazine feature is because the piece focused on the journey of becoming a WAHA—and security just didn’t have a place, given that theme. You’re also absolutely right about the potential damage to credibility if a customer hears children crying or yelling in the background. That’s an important aspect of working from home—so much so that I included some of the strategies used by the profiled WAHAs, as well as the stringent vetting procedures that vendors use before approving any new workers. Thanks again for taking the time to read the piece, and to respond to it. (Don’t) Pump Up the Volume DAVID MYRON’S ARTICLE “These Mar- keting Messages Go to 11” (Front Office, October 2008, http://snurl.com/1008fo) triggers a pet peeve of mine, too. Playing in bands years ago, I routinely wore ear plugs to reduce the damage to my ears and I never stood in front of the bass player’s amp during a gig. Competing for my attention by turning up the volume is offensive and not effective. If anything, it drives me away. Too bad most marketers have forgotten the “moment of softness” commercials from some years back. They were visually appealing, inoffensive, and allowed you to hear (rather than lip-read) your conversation with the person sitting next to you. Even more to the point, the article reminded me of the old joke about how to speak a foreign language: In South or 8 Central America you add “o” to most words; in Italy you add the “o”—and yell. Recently I heard that two of the fastestgrowing markets for the 25-to-35-yearold age bracket were chiropracty (as a result of the odd walking motion required to retain one’s trousers above the kneecap) and hearing aids, thanks to movies and car stereos that were played too loud. Bill Galbreath Multi Business Systems bgalbreath@multibusinesssystems.com Breeding New CRM Consultants I THOUGHT “The New Breed of CRM Consultant” (October 2008, http://snurl.com/ 1008mckay) was great! As an ex-PricewaterhouseCoopers/IBMer who has implemented some of the most complex SAP/Oracle CRM implementations around, I think Letters may be edited for length or clarity. www.destinationCRM.com CUSTOMER RELATIONSHIP MANAGEMENT | JANUARY 2009 http://snurl.com/1008musico http://www.Salesforce.com http://snurl.com/Jan09feedback1 http://snurl.com/4khc4 http://snurl.com/1008fo http://snurl.com/1008mckay http://snurl.com/1008mckay http://www.destinationCRM.com
Table of Contents Feed for the Digital Edition of CRM - January 2009 CRM - January 2009 Contents Front Office Feedback Reality Check Customer Centricity The Tipping Point The Shots Heard ’Round the World 30,000-Foot Views Of the Cloud Stuffing the Ballot Box— With Complaints The Marketing Line for ’09 CRM on Twitter Technology Helps Insurance Weather the Storm Required Reading The Google-ization of CRM The Feedback Funnel Email: What’s Inside? Shake Your Moneymakers Lead Sweet Lead Incentives at the Speed of Lightpath Sales Contentment for Content Management A Worthwhile Excursion Into Call Recording Secret of My Success Re:Tooling Connect Pint of View CRM - January 2009 CRM - January 2009 - CRM - January 2009 (Page Cover1) CRM - January 2009 - CRM - January 2009 (Page Cover2) CRM - January 2009 - Contents (Page 3) CRM - January 2009 - Contents (Page 4) CRM - January 2009 - Contents (Page 5) CRM - January 2009 - Front Office (Page 6) CRM - January 2009 - Front Office (Page 7) CRM - January 2009 - Feedback (Page 8) CRM - January 2009 - Feedback (Page 9) CRM - January 2009 - Reality Check (Page 10) CRM - January 2009 - Reality Check (Page 11) CRM - January 2009 - Customer Centricity (Page 12) CRM - January 2009 - Customer Centricity (Page 13) CRM - January 2009 - The Tipping Point (Page 14) CRM - January 2009 - The Tipping Point (Page 15) CRM - January 2009 - The Shots Heard ’Round the World (Page 16) CRM - January 2009 - 30,000-Foot Views Of the Cloud (Page 17) CRM - January 2009 - Stuffing the Ballot Box— With Complaints (Page 18) CRM - January 2009 - CRM on Twitter (Page 19) CRM - January 2009 - Technology Helps Insurance Weather the Storm (Page 20) CRM - January 2009 - Required Reading (Page 21) CRM - January 2009 - The Google-ization of CRM (Page 22) CRM - January 2009 - The Google-ization of CRM (Page 23) CRM - January 2009 - The Google-ization of CRM (Page 24) CRM - January 2009 - The Google-ization of CRM (Page 25) CRM - January 2009 - The Google-ization of CRM (Page 26) CRM - January 2009 - The Google-ization of CRM (Page BPS1) CRM - January 2009 - The Google-ization of CRM (Page BPS2) CRM - January 2009 - The Google-ization of CRM (Page BPS3) CRM - January 2009 - The Google-ization of CRM (Page BPS4) CRM - January 2009 - The Google-ization of CRM (Page BPS5) CRM - January 2009 - The Google-ization of CRM (Page BPS6) CRM - January 2009 - The Google-ization of CRM (Page BPS7) CRM - January 2009 - The Google-ization of CRM (Page BPS8) CRM - January 2009 - The Google-ization of CRM (Page BPS9) CRM - January 2009 - The Google-ization of CRM (Page BPS10) CRM - January 2009 - The Google-ization of CRM (Page BPS11) CRM - January 2009 - The Google-ization of CRM (Page BPS12) CRM - January 2009 - The Feedback Funnel (Page 27) CRM - January 2009 - The Feedback Funnel (Page 28) CRM - January 2009 - The Feedback Funnel (Page 29) CRM - January 2009 - The Feedback Funnel (Page 30) CRM - January 2009 - The Feedback Funnel (Page 31) CRM - January 2009 - Email: What’s Inside? (Page 32) CRM - January 2009 - Email: What’s Inside? (Page 33) CRM - January 2009 - Email: What’s Inside? (Page 34) CRM - January 2009 - Email: What’s Inside? (Page 35) CRM - January 2009 - Email: What’s Inside? (Page 36) CRM - January 2009 - Email: What’s Inside? (Page 37) CRM - January 2009 - Email: What’s Inside? (Page 38) CRM - January 2009 - Shake Your Moneymakers (Page 39) CRM - January 2009 - Shake Your Moneymakers (Page 40) CRM - January 2009 - Shake Your Moneymakers (Page 41) CRM - January 2009 - Shake Your Moneymakers (Page 42) CRM - January 2009 - Incentives at the Speed of Lightpath (Page 43) CRM - January 2009 - Sales Contentment for Content Management (Page 44) CRM - January 2009 - A Worthwhile Excursion Into Call Recording (Page 45) CRM - January 2009 - Secret of My Success (Page 46) CRM - January 2009 - Re:Tooling (Page 47) CRM - January 2009 - Connect (Page 48) CRM - January 2009 - Connect (Page 49) CRM - January 2009 - Pint of View (Page 50) CRM - January 2009 - Pint of View (Page Cover3) CRM - January 2009 - Pint of View (Page Cover4)
For optimal viewing of this digital publication, please enable JavaScript and then refresh the page. If you would like to try to load the digital publication without using Flash Player detection, please click here.