CRM - April 2008 - (Page 10) REALITY CHECK BY JIM DICKIE The Poker Dynamics of CRM Today’s companies are finding a full house of technology options H AV I N G J U S T completed our 2008 Sales Performance Optimization survey of over 1,500 companies worldwide, the similarities between poker and CRM come to mind. The percentage of companies “buying in” and implementing a core CRM system (from Oracle, Salesforce.com, Microsoft, etc.) continues to increase: 70 percent of the firms surveyed, an all-time high. And the buy-in trend should continue: Of the 30 percent that reported having no CRM system installed, 43 percent said they wanted a seat at the table, and that they planned to implement CRM this year. The steady increase in technology adoption over the past four years is being primarily driven by software-as-aservice (SaaS) solutions. The SaaS model has made CRM financially and technically attractive for a growing number of firms, especially small and midsize businesses (SMBs). Once CRM gets in, many companies decide to doubledown by increasing the number of CRM technologies they use. When we asked the firms with core CRM systems installed what other CRM tools they had implemented (or were planning to implement in 2008) we discovered a strong tendency toward drawing to an inside straight— adding technology to aid the sales force. (See chart.) Topping the list are collaboration tools such as top pair Cisco’s WebEx and Citrix’s GoToMeeting. Other technology sectors offer three or four of a kind when it comes to vendor options. Lead management includes applications such as Eloqua, Manticore, and Vtrenz. Chief sales officers beginning to see the power of analytics are turning OTHER CRM TECHNOLOGIES IMPLEMENTED/PLANNED Sales Force Collaboration Lead Generation/Management Sales Analytics/Forecasting Sales Knowledge Management CRM/Sales Process Integration Incentive Management 18% SOURCE: CSO INSIGHTS 57% 36% 30% 26% 24% to systems like those from Cloud9, LucidEra, i-Snapshot, and others. Kadient, OutStart, and Salesforce.com’s Koral, among others, are gaining ground in the sales knowledge management space. Leading sales process firms such as SPI, the TAS Group, Knowledge Advantage, and Market-Partners are now seeing their methodologies being integrated directly into CRM systems. And an increasing number of sales organizations are opting to replace homegrown incentive management systems with commercial offerings from Xactly, Varicent, and Centive, to name a few. The final trend we’re seeing is that some existing CRM users are throwing in a bad hand and looking for a redeal. What do I mean by that? As part of our study, we asked the 70 percent of firms that have already implemented a core CRM application if they had any plans to replace their existing solution—and 13 percent said yes. We then further segmented the study data based on length of time an application had been installed. In looking at firms that had their current CRM application in place for three years or more, nearly 1 in 5 acknowledged plans to replace that system in 2008. Why the desire to switch? Part of it is dissatisfaction or disenchantment with the hand they’d been dealt. When we asked executives to name their main sales objective for 2008, increasing revenues topped the list. Yet when we asked CRM users to tell us the top three benefits they were achieving through the implementation of CRM solutions, revenue improvement came in seventh. In other words, some organizations are opting for the newer generation of CRM solutions in hopes of achieving the real objectives they turned to CRM for in the first place. But the ultimate realization to be drawn from the study data? That CRM is considered “table stakes” in business today, the ante required to compete. An everincreasing number of companies are getting great at leveraging the available tools, and in doing so are watching their chip count rise. As a result, these successes are making CRM a game that all companies need to play— and play well—if they’re going to remain competitive. And that’s no bluff. Jim Dickie is a partner with CSO Insights, a research firm that specializes in benchmarking CRM and sales effectiveness initiatives. He can be reached at jim.dickie@csoinsights.com. 10 CUSTOMER RELATIONSHIP MANAGEMENT | APRIL 2008 www.destinationCRM.com http://Salesforce.com http://www.destinationCRM.com
Table of Contents Feed for the Digital Edition of CRM - April 2008 CRM - April 2008 Contents Front Office Reality Check Customer Centricity The Tipping Point A Tenancy of One’s Own The Rebirth of Taxes destinationCRM Dashboard Labor Disputes Reach The Contract Center The Plight of the Wirelines Required Reading The 2008 Service Awards The 2008 Service Leader Awards Customer Self-Service Microsoft Genesys Oracle eGain Astute Solutions The 2008 Rising Stars The 2008 Service Elite Awar Re:Tooling Scouting Report Pint of View CRM - April 2008 CRM - April 2008 - CRM - April 2008 (Page Cover1) CRM - April 2008 - CRM - April 2008 (Page Cover2) CRM - April 2008 - Contents (Page 3) CRM - April 2008 - Contents (Page 4) CRM - April 2008 - Contents (Page 5) CRM - April 2008 - Contents (Page 6) CRM - April 2008 - Contents (Page 7) CRM - April 2008 - Front Office (Page 8) CRM - April 2008 - Front Office (Page 9) CRM - April 2008 - Reality Check (Page 10) CRM - April 2008 - Reality Check (Page 11) CRM - April 2008 - Customer Centricity (Page 12) CRM - April 2008 - Customer Centricity (Page 13) CRM - April 2008 - The Tipping Point (Page 14) CRM - April 2008 - The Tipping Point (Page 15) CRM - April 2008 - A Tenancy of One’s Own (Page 16) CRM - April 2008 - The Rebirth of Taxes (Page 17) CRM - April 2008 - destinationCRM Dashboard (Page 18) CRM - April 2008 - Labor Disputes Reach The Contract Center (Page 19) CRM - April 2008 - The Plight of the Wirelines (Page 20) CRM - April 2008 - Required Reading (Page 21) CRM - April 2008 - Required Reading (Page 22) CRM - April 2008 - The 2008 Service Awards (Page 23) CRM - April 2008 - The 2008 Service Leader Awards (Page 24) CRM - April 2008 - The 2008 Service Leader Awards (Page 25) CRM - April 2008 - The 2008 Service Leader Awards (Page 26) CRM - April 2008 - Customer Self-Service (Page C1) CRM - April 2008 - Customer Self-Service (Page C2) CRM - April 2008 - Microsoft (Page C3) CRM - April 2008 - Microsoft (Page C4) CRM - April 2008 - Microsoft (Page C5) CRM - April 2008 - Microsoft (Page C6) CRM - April 2008 - Genesys (Page C7) CRM - April 2008 - Genesys (Page C8) CRM - April 2008 - Genesys (Page C9) CRM - April 2008 - Oracle (Page C10) CRM - April 2008 - Oracle (Page C11) CRM - April 2008 - Oracle (Page C12) CRM - April 2008 - eGain (Page C13) CRM - April 2008 - Astute Solutions (Page C14) CRM - April 2008 - Astute Solutions (Page C15) CRM - April 2008 - Astute Solutions (Page C16) CRM - April 2008 - Astute Solutions (Page 27) CRM - April 2008 - Astute Solutions (Page 28) CRM - April 2008 - Astute Solutions (Page 29) CRM - April 2008 - Astute Solutions (Page 30) CRM - April 2008 - Astute Solutions (Page 31) CRM - April 2008 - Astute Solutions (Page 32) CRM - April 2008 - Astute Solutions (Page 33) CRM - April 2008 - Astute Solutions (Page 34) CRM - April 2008 - The 2008 Rising Stars (Page 35) CRM - April 2008 - The 2008 Rising Stars (Page 36) CRM - April 2008 - The 2008 Rising Stars (Page 37) CRM - April 2008 - The 2008 Rising Stars (Page 38) CRM - April 2008 - The 2008 Rising Stars (Page 39) CRM - April 2008 - The 2008 Rising Stars (Page 40) CRM - April 2008 - The 2008 Service Elite Awar (Page 41) CRM - April 2008 - The 2008 Service Elite Awar (Page 42) CRM - April 2008 - The 2008 Service Elite Awar (Page 43) CRM - April 2008 - The 2008 Service Elite Awar (Page 44) CRM - April 2008 - The 2008 Service Elite Awar (Page 45) CRM - April 2008 - Re:Tooling (Page 46) CRM - April 2008 - Re:Tooling (Page 47) CRM - April 2008 - Scouting Report (Page 48) CRM - April 2008 - Scouting Report (Page 49) CRM - April 2008 - Pint of View (Page 50) CRM - April 2008 - Pint of View (Page Cover3) CRM - April 2008 - Pint of View (Page Cover4)
For optimal viewing of this digital publication, please enable JavaScript and then refresh the page. If you would like to try to load the digital publication without using Flash Player detection, please click here.