CRM - April 2008 - (Page 45) THE 2008 SERVICE WORKFORCE MANAGEMENT K E Y R E S U LT S JPMORGAN CHASE CARD SERVICES • 30 percent of underperforming agents achieved acceptable first-call resolution within 90 days • Call volume decreased 8.3 percent despite a 5.2 percent increase in total active accounts • Average handle time decreased by two seconds per call, for a savings of $2.5 million • Agent turnover decreased and morale improved “We took the great reports we had and drove [that] to the rep level, [so] they each know their first-call resolution rate.” —DEBORAH WALDEN o you think your contact centers are busy? Each of JPMorgan Chase Card Services’ 4,000 agents worldwide field up to 120 calls a day, totaling close to 200 million contacts a year. With a booming customer base—over 100 million—and increased competition, it became critical for the company to look at customer interactions in new ways. Customers are life to a company such as Chase, and senior executives—from the CEO on down—regularly review customer call recordings to keep a finger on the pulse of that life. First-call resolution (FCR) is the medicine to keep the pressure down. Much of the difficulty with achieving FCR came from hiccups in company policy, according to Deborah Walden, executive vice president, customer care, Chase Card Services. One example—balance transfers—was particularly heinous. Agents could only process them when the customer was calling from home; the fee structure kept changing; and, worst of all, the company was offering heavy incentives for agents to increase transfer rates and average handling time for balance-transfer calls. Agents were juggling the calls for low-limit customers to increase their credit limit, to do the balance transfer, and hold the call during the transfer so as to not to lose the customer. Improving FCR rates required two things. The first was to change how agents were coached. The second was to use technology to unite information from various sources to analyze FCR rates not just by agent, but by call reason, average hold time, channel, and a number of other metrics. To address the first requirement, managers were mandated to spend 90 percent of their time coaching agents. For the second, Chase partnered with Enkata. Enkata’s On-Demand Performance and Talent Management solution gave the card services department a tracking and reporting system that worked.“We focus on rework and repeat calls, specifically reducing them,” says Dave Stamm, president and CEO of Enkata. “Enkata identifies repeat-call sequences and makes the information actionable.” Walden notes there will always be situations in which customers do call back. Disputed charges, for instance, will often take multiple contacts. “Customers call us to notify us they no longer want to dispute a charge they had previously called us to dispute,” Walden says. “They may receive a credit from the merchant or they now remember the transaction.” Other cases, such as finding out about an offer during a service call and wanting to think about it first, also would require multiple touches. In addition to sorting calls to increase contact center efficiency, Enkata’s software tracks coaching-session activity and performance improvement shown by the agents most in need. That information is visible to managers, but also to the agents themselves. “Because we took the great reports we had and drove [that] to the rep level, they each know their FCR rate—not just overall, but by type of call,”Walden says.“Each agent can see exactly where they have to improve.” Of course, technology only enables high performance; it’s the desire to succeed that makes it a reality. “Our employees want to do a great job,” Walden says. “Enkata brought us a level of reporting that allows them to achieve that.” Within 90 days of the deployment, 30 percent of the outlier agents (those whose performance was not up to the norm) “graduated” to an acceptable FCR rate. Six months after deploying Enkata, call volume had decreased by 8.3 percent, even though the number of active accounts had increased by 5.2 percent. JPMorgan Chase is also seeing efficiencies in areas such as reporting consolidation, coaching tracking, and call-reasoning efficiency. By switching to automated call reasoning, the company estimates saving an average of two seconds per contact to tag a call reason. Does two seconds sound insignificant? Well, it translates to $2.5 million in savings per year. That’s worth the chase. —Marshall Lager www.destinationCRM.com CUSTOMER RELATIONSHIP MANAGEMENT | APRIL 2008 45 service s Credit Where Due JPMORGAN CHASE CARD SERVICES HAS ENKATA TO THANK FOR A UNIFICATION OF AGENT METRICS elite AWARDS http://www.destinationCRM.com
Table of Contents Feed for the Digital Edition of CRM - April 2008 CRM - April 2008 Contents Front Office Reality Check Customer Centricity The Tipping Point A Tenancy of One’s Own The Rebirth of Taxes destinationCRM Dashboard Labor Disputes Reach The Contract Center The Plight of the Wirelines Required Reading The 2008 Service Awards The 2008 Service Leader Awards Customer Self-Service Microsoft Genesys Oracle eGain Astute Solutions The 2008 Rising Stars The 2008 Service Elite Awar Re:Tooling Scouting Report Pint of View CRM - April 2008 CRM - April 2008 - CRM - April 2008 (Page Cover1) CRM - April 2008 - CRM - April 2008 (Page Cover2) CRM - April 2008 - Contents (Page 3) CRM - April 2008 - Contents (Page 4) CRM - April 2008 - Contents (Page 5) CRM - April 2008 - Contents (Page 6) CRM - April 2008 - Contents (Page 7) CRM - April 2008 - Front Office (Page 8) CRM - April 2008 - Front Office (Page 9) CRM - April 2008 - Reality Check (Page 10) CRM - April 2008 - Reality Check (Page 11) CRM - April 2008 - Customer Centricity (Page 12) CRM - April 2008 - Customer Centricity (Page 13) CRM - April 2008 - The Tipping Point (Page 14) CRM - April 2008 - The Tipping Point (Page 15) CRM - April 2008 - A Tenancy of One’s Own (Page 16) CRM - April 2008 - The Rebirth of Taxes (Page 17) CRM - April 2008 - destinationCRM Dashboard (Page 18) CRM - April 2008 - Labor Disputes Reach The Contract Center (Page 19) CRM - April 2008 - The Plight of the Wirelines (Page 20) CRM - April 2008 - Required Reading (Page 21) CRM - April 2008 - Required Reading (Page 22) CRM - April 2008 - The 2008 Service Awards (Page 23) CRM - April 2008 - The 2008 Service Leader Awards (Page 24) CRM - April 2008 - The 2008 Service Leader Awards (Page 25) CRM - April 2008 - The 2008 Service Leader Awards (Page 26) CRM - April 2008 - Customer Self-Service (Page C1) CRM - April 2008 - Customer Self-Service (Page C2) CRM - April 2008 - Microsoft (Page C3) CRM - April 2008 - Microsoft (Page C4) CRM - April 2008 - Microsoft (Page C5) CRM - April 2008 - Microsoft (Page C6) CRM - April 2008 - Genesys (Page C7) CRM - April 2008 - Genesys (Page C8) CRM - April 2008 - Genesys (Page C9) CRM - April 2008 - Oracle (Page C10) CRM - April 2008 - Oracle (Page C11) CRM - April 2008 - Oracle (Page C12) CRM - April 2008 - eGain (Page C13) CRM - April 2008 - Astute Solutions (Page C14) CRM - April 2008 - Astute Solutions (Page C15) CRM - April 2008 - Astute Solutions (Page C16) CRM - April 2008 - Astute Solutions (Page 27) CRM - April 2008 - Astute Solutions (Page 28) CRM - April 2008 - Astute Solutions (Page 29) CRM - April 2008 - Astute Solutions (Page 30) CRM - April 2008 - Astute Solutions (Page 31) CRM - April 2008 - Astute Solutions (Page 32) CRM - April 2008 - Astute Solutions (Page 33) CRM - April 2008 - Astute Solutions (Page 34) CRM - April 2008 - The 2008 Rising Stars (Page 35) CRM - April 2008 - The 2008 Rising Stars (Page 36) CRM - April 2008 - The 2008 Rising Stars (Page 37) CRM - April 2008 - The 2008 Rising Stars (Page 38) CRM - April 2008 - The 2008 Rising Stars (Page 39) CRM - April 2008 - The 2008 Rising Stars (Page 40) CRM - April 2008 - The 2008 Service Elite Awar (Page 41) CRM - April 2008 - The 2008 Service Elite Awar (Page 42) CRM - April 2008 - The 2008 Service Elite Awar (Page 43) CRM - April 2008 - The 2008 Service Elite Awar (Page 44) CRM - April 2008 - The 2008 Service Elite Awar (Page 45) CRM - April 2008 - Re:Tooling (Page 46) CRM - April 2008 - Re:Tooling (Page 47) CRM - April 2008 - Scouting Report (Page 48) CRM - April 2008 - Scouting Report (Page 49) CRM - April 2008 - Pint of View (Page 50) CRM - April 2008 - Pint of View (Page Cover3) CRM - April 2008 - Pint of View (Page Cover4)
For optimal viewing of this digital publication, please enable JavaScript and then refresh the page. If you would like to try to load the digital publication without using Flash Player detection, please click here.