preLaw Magazine - Fall 2008 - (Page 23) Who gives away the most money? g R Rank 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 23 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 33 35 36 37 38 39 39 41 42 43 44 45 46 46 48 48 50 Law School Thomas M. Cooley Law School University of Toledo Liberty University Northern Kentucky University University of La Verne University of St. Thomas School of Law University of Akron University of Connecticut Howard University Hamline University Whittier College Southern Methodist University Western New England College Ohio Northern University University of Alabama University of Iowa University of Nebraska Indiana University-Bloomington Wake Forest University Louisianna State University University of Tennessee Ave Maria University School of Law UDC University of Arizona Capital University Brooklyn Law School St. John's University University of North Carolina Quinnipiac College Florida Coastal School of Law McGeorge School of Law Florida International School of Law Michigan State University DePaul University UC-Davis Chapman University School of Law Vanderbilt University University of Kansas University of Missouri-Kansas City University of Arkansas-Fayettville University of Mississippi University of Wisconsin University of Maryland Gonzaga University University of Pittsburgh UCLA Southern Illinois University-Carbondale University of San Diego Seton Hall University University of Virginia % to tuition 93.90% 61.40% 51.20% 50.40% 49% 43.60% 43.20% 41.50% 41.30% 39.30% 36% 35.80% 35.10% 34.30% 34.20% 34.10% 33.20% 32.60% 32.30% 31.90% 31.70% 31.20% 31% 31% 30.80% 30.10% 29.50% 28.20% 28.10% 28% 27.70% 27.50% 27.30% 27.30% 26.80% 26.30% 25.90% 25.70% 24.80% 24.80% 24.70% 24.40% 24.30% 24.10% 24% 23.60% 23.60% 23.30% 23.30% 23.20% ❱ photo by melissa stottlemyer Source: Data compiled from the Official Guide to ABA-approved Law Schools 20 2008 Edition. To get the calculation, preLaw Magazine compared each law schools median grant compared to tuition. The final figure was run percent to tuition. Fall 2008 23
For optimal viewing of this digital publication, please enable JavaScript and then refresh the page. If you would like to try to load the digital publication without using Flash Player detection, please click here.