Edutopia - September 2007 - (Page 34) D e si g n much of it raised through private individuals, members of the church’s board of trustees, and friends and supporters of St. Philip’s. “More than just making a sustainable building, we wanted to create an environment in which the students are an integral part of the process and can learn from it,” Brito says. “For instance, on the roof of the gym, we are putting in a garden with 2 feet of soil and some raised beds with 4 feet of soil. The kids will grow some of the food that will be used in the cafeteria, and they’ll compost waste to return to the garden in a closed-loop food cycle. That project-based study will be part of our teaching about Garden of Eating: Project-based learning in the gym roof garden will help supply organic produce for school lunches. According to Miguel Brito, the school’s principal since 2000 (St. Philip’s was founded in 1988 by the dean of the Newark Episcopal Diocese’s Trinity and St. Philip’s Cathedral), “We looked at over twenty sites before locating the right building about a mile from our original school. The search was a real challenge for nonprofessionals, but luckily we had friends in Newark real estate.” Finding a site was just the first of the challenges. “The building had been through many incarnations since its original use as a chocolate factory, and after the 1967 Newark riots, it was abandoned,” Brito says. “So it had to be gutted and completely redone.” But not torn down. Ralph Walker, lead Gensler architect on the four-year project and a specialist in designing educational facilities, emphasizes that the idea of demolishing an old building and starting over runs counter to the principle of sustainability and conservation. “To tear down a basically sound structure is a big waste of materials,” he says. “Though renovating an old, existing building creates certain limitations, the size and location of the old factory were ideal.” Also, Walker points out that the rigorous process of finding the right place gave everyone involved a chance to refine their goals. “At Gensler, we spend a lot of time with a client before we begin actual work on a project,” Walker says, “and the process of eliminating buildings gave us a chance to dig in and understand what the expectations for the new school were.” Beyond the initial goal of providing students with more space for science classes and labs and an all-around larger environment (including a full-size gym, which the old school lacked), the driving expectation was to go green in both structure and spirit. The budget for the renovation was $22 million, nutrition, wellness, and health.” Ralph Walker says the design brings together the old building with new elements but doesn’t attempt to have the new overshadow the old. “We wanted to note the changes, not camouflage them,” he says. “For instance, when we put in acoustical ceilings, we placed them between the original wooden beams, which we left unclad and rough. Similarly, the glass ‘lantern’ that brings natural light into the interior is pulled away from the brick face of the building so that it’s clearly an add-on.” The school continues to be a work in progress. “After we moved in, some of the construction was still going on, so students could get a vivid idea of what the job of building entails,” Brito says. Taking a cue from living-history museums such as Colonial Williamsburg, Gensler designers are at work on a signage project that will turn the school into a kind of physical curriculum. “As an example, those wooden beams will have signs that will discuss forests, the timber industry, sustainable logging, even how wood has been used in construction through history,” Walker says. “We are working with the science faculty on how various architectural elements could be used for life sciences.” This signage is designated as stage two in the renovation, which Walker hopes will be funded by a new series of grants. “We’re planning for teachers and students to be able to use the signs in a kind of scavenger hunt, to encourage them to put together a complete narrative, piece by piece,” he adds. “It’s been a long run, but there’s a certain thrill to the whole process,” says Brito. “For all of us, just being in the building is uplifting. If I could have written down the most hopeful scenario, it wouldn’t compare to the reality.” e 34 EDUTOPIA SEPTEMBER 2007
For optimal viewing of this digital publication, please enable JavaScript and then refresh the page. If you would like to try to load the digital publication without using Flash Player detection, please click here.