Government Technology - February 2008 - (Page 37) Adarmes said he believes paper files are more secure than digital health records. “If somebody wants to get a document, they have to come into my file room and pull the chart,” he said. “Computer systems in doctors’ offices are already targeted to steal identities.” Adarmes also is concerned about who owns the data. Is it the patient’s? The doctor’s? Maybe it rightfully belongs to the insurance provider. His point is that there are currently too many unknowns to comfortably move to an EHR system. Most who are observing the issue agree EHRs and PHRs have potential to do good. The industry’s readiness seems to be the central point of debate. Boynton’s thoughts on electronic medical data probably go a long way toward summing up the feelings of both advocates and opponents. “The possibilities, I think, are endless,” she said “And as a result, so is the obligation to ensure that the information is well protected.” Dorsett said he thinks the industry will move toward implementing PHRs instead “ IF YOU THINK ABOUT GOVERNMENTSPONSORED HEALTH CARE,YOU CAN IMAGINE THAT THE CHALLENGES AROUND DATA FRAGMENTATION ARE EVEN MORE ACUTE. Nate McLemore, director of business development, Microsoft Health Solutions Group ” of EHRs because of an overall trend of consumer empowerment in the United States. “PHRs focus on the patient having the ability to store their personal health information. They have absolute control over it; they decide who looks at it. I think there is a general movement toward consumerdriven health care. It’s about empowering the patient to have control over his or her information. Right now, it’s squarely in the hands of the physician.” Dorsett also cites problems that have cropped up in recent attempts to implement large-scale EHR systems. Kaiser Permanente and Cedars-Sinai Medical Center tried to deploy internal EHR systems. Both systems were met with high costs, user dissatisfaction, errors and technical problems. Consequently Dorsett thinks PHRs will be the preferred technology in the near future if only because they are so much simpler. “The technology is very expensive still,” he said. “There are so many systems on the market and so many horror stories of wasted expense on trying to get up and running on EHRs, so you have a cautious market out there. The other issue is these systems, by and large, don’t communicate with one another. There’s apprehension in the marketplace. With PHRs, it’s much easier because physicians aren’t asked to adopt a PHR. Patients are.” j B A D M E D I C I N E C O N T I N U E D F R O M PAG E 29 Ryan went to local law enforcement, but like most local agencies, they weren’t familiar with medical identity theft. That fact, and the nature of the crime, makes it difficult to police. “Sometimes you can identify somebody who had access to the medical data, then trace that medical data in terms of how it was falsely billed, and that will lead you to the subject,” Ormsby said. “In other cases, such as hacking cases, those are more difficult because it’s more of a cyber-crime.” She said many of the cases are complex and require the expertise of a variety of agencies to solve. IN OTHER CASES, SUCH AS HACKING CASES,THOSE ARE MORE DIFFICULT BECAUSE IT’S MORE OF A CYBER-CRIME. Sharon Ormsby, section chief for financial crimes, FBI ” Fighting Back The best way to police medical identity theft is to prevent it, Ormsby said. Local law enforcement can begin by performing community outreach programs that educate their municipalities. Local police should also share identity theft information with state and federal authorities and make referrals to the appropriate state and federal agencies when they learn of a medical identity theft complaint. Lastly they can participate in federal and state working groups that deal with health-care fraud. Individuals should peruse EOB statements from their health insurers to spot unusual charges. “We’ve established some programs and initiatives where we’re trying to get our licensees to entertain the idea of educating their subscribers on a quick and regular basis,” Sneed said. “Explain to them that they are our first line of defense with respect to health-care fraud. That means looking at your explanation of benefits form when it comes in.” Another aspect of prevention is better security for electronic health records, which are beginning to really take hold, Sneed said. “Facilities, associations and insurers have to keep that as an aspect they have to be aware of as they create their electronic health records, practices and procedures, and account for the idea that this is going to open up databases of information that may be vulnerable. There has to be a risk assessment.” The WPF advocates a National Health Information Network that would be established using comprehensive risk assessments that prevent medical identity theft while protecting privacy, and more mechanisms for individuals to correct errors in their medical histories, as well as notification of medical data breaches to consumers. The prospect for a continuing trend in medical identity theft is good as health-care record-keeping becomes increasingly automated and because it is so difficult to detect, according to Dixon. “It’s going to get worse before it gets better because it’s really tough to fix.” 37 http://www.govtech.com
Table of Contents Feed for the Digital Edition of Government Technology - February 2008 Government Technology - February 2008 Contents Point of View Big Picture The Last Mile On the Screen Products Four Questions for... CSI Effect Bad Medicine Making Health Care Personal Cashing In GIS for Less Nabbing Speedsters First Person: Records Management Chatter Box Oregon Data Centers Go Green Products Two Cents Spectrum Up Close Personal Computing signal:noise Government Solutions - Spring 2008 Power Play Double Duty Cleaning House Twice Prepared Smart Move The Path to Success Foundation for Service Government Technology - February 2008 Government Technology - February 2008 - Government Technology - February 2008 (Page Cover1) Government Technology - February 2008 - Government Technology - February 2008 (Page Cover2) Government Technology - February 2008 - Government Technology - February 2008 (Page 3) Government Technology - February 2008 - Contents (Page 4) Government Technology - February 2008 - Contents (Page 5) Government Technology - February 2008 - Contents (Page 6) Government Technology - February 2008 - Contents (Page 7) Government Technology - February 2008 - Point of View (Page 8) Government Technology - February 2008 - Point of View (Page 9) Government Technology - February 2008 - Big Picture (Page 10) Government Technology - February 2008 - Big Picture (Page 11) Government Technology - February 2008 - The Last Mile (Page 12) Government Technology - February 2008 - The Last Mile (Page 13) Government Technology - February 2008 - Products (Page 14) Government Technology - February 2008 - Products (Page 15) Government Technology - February 2008 - Four Questions for... (Page 16) Government Technology - February 2008 - Four Questions for... (Page 17) Government Technology - February 2008 - CSI Effect (Page 18) Government Technology - February 2008 - CSI Effect (Page 19) Government Technology - February 2008 - CSI Effect (Page 20) Government Technology - February 2008 - CSI Effect (Page 21) Government Technology - February 2008 - CSI Effect (Page 22) Government Technology - February 2008 - CSI Effect (Page 23) Government Technology - February 2008 - CSI Effect (Page 24) Government Technology - February 2008 - CSI Effect (Page 25) Government Technology - February 2008 - Bad Medicine (Page 26) Government Technology - February 2008 - Bad Medicine (Page 27) Government Technology - February 2008 - Bad Medicine (Page 28) Government Technology - February 2008 - Bad Medicine (Page 29) Government Technology - February 2008 - Bad Medicine (Page 30) Government Technology - February 2008 - Bad Medicine (Page 31) Government Technology - February 2008 - Making Health Care Personal (Page 32) Government Technology - February 2008 - Making Health Care Personal (Page 33) Government Technology - February 2008 - Making Health Care Personal (Page 34) Government Technology - February 2008 - Making Health Care Personal (Page 35) Government Technology - February 2008 - Making Health Care Personal (Page 36) Government Technology - February 2008 - Making Health Care Personal (Page 37) Government Technology - February 2008 - Cashing In (Page 38) Government Technology - February 2008 - Cashing In (Page 39) Government Technology - February 2008 - GIS for Less (Page 40) Government Technology - February 2008 - GIS for Less (Page 41) Government Technology - February 2008 - Nabbing Speedsters (Page 42) Government Technology - February 2008 - Nabbing Speedsters (Page 43) Government Technology - February 2008 - First Person: Records Management (Page 44) Government Technology - February 2008 - First Person: Records Management (Page 45) Government Technology - February 2008 - Chatter Box (Page 46) Government Technology - February 2008 - Chatter Box (Page 47) Government Technology - February 2008 - Oregon Data Centers Go Green (Page 48) Government Technology - February 2008 - Oregon Data Centers Go Green (Page 49) Government Technology - February 2008 - Products (Page 50) Government Technology - February 2008 - Two Cents (Page 51) Government Technology - February 2008 - Spectrum (Page 52) Government Technology - February 2008 - Spectrum (Page 53) Government Technology - February 2008 - Up Close (Page 54) Government Technology - February 2008 - Up Close (Page 55) Government Technology - February 2008 - Personal Computing (Page 56) Government Technology - February 2008 - Personal Computing (Page 57) Government Technology - February 2008 - signal:noise (Page 58) Government Technology - February 2008 - signal:noise (Page Cover3) Government Technology - February 2008 - signal:noise (Page Cover4) Government Technology - February 2008 - Government Solutions - Spring 2008 (Page S1) Government Technology - February 2008 - Government Solutions - Spring 2008 (Page S2) Government Technology - February 2008 - Government Solutions - Spring 2008 (Page S3) Government Technology - February 2008 - Power Play (Page S4) Government Technology - February 2008 - Power Play (Page S5) Government Technology - February 2008 - Power Play (Page S6) Government Technology - February 2008 - Power Play (Page S7) Government Technology - February 2008 - Power Play (Page S8) Government Technology - February 2008 - Power Play (Page S9) Government Technology - February 2008 - Power Play (Page S10) Government Technology - February 2008 - Power Play (Page S11) Government Technology - February 2008 - Power Play (Page S12) Government Technology - February 2008 - Power Play (Page S13) Government Technology - February 2008 - Double Duty (Page S14) Government Technology - February 2008 - Double Duty (Page S15) Government Technology - February 2008 - Double Duty (Page S16) Government Technology - February 2008 - Double Duty (Page S17) Government Technology - February 2008 - Double Duty (Page S18) Government Technology - February 2008 - Double Duty (Page S19) Government Technology - February 2008 - Cleaning House (Page S20) Government Technology - February 2008 - Cleaning House (Page S21) Government Technology - February 2008 - Cleaning House (Page S22) Government Technology - February 2008 - Cleaning House (Page S23) Government Technology - February 2008 - Cleaning House (Page S24) Government Technology - February 2008 - Cleaning House (Page S25) Government Technology - February 2008 - Twice Prepared (Page S26) Government Technology - February 2008 - Twice Prepared (Page S27) Government Technology - February 2008 - Twice Prepared (Page S28) Government Technology - February 2008 - Twice Prepared (Page S29) Government Technology - February 2008 - Twice Prepared (Page S30) Government Technology - February 2008 - Twice Prepared (Page S31) Government Technology - February 2008 - Smart Move (Page S32) Government Technology - February 2008 - Smart Move (Page S33) Government Technology - February 2008 - Smart Move (Page S34) Government Technology - February 2008 - Smart Move (Page S35) Government Technology - February 2008 - Smart Move (Page S36) Government Technology - February 2008 - Smart Move (Page S37) Government Technology - February 2008 - The Path to Success (Page S38) Government Technology - February 2008 - The Path to Success (Page S39) Government Technology - February 2008 - The Path to Success (Page S40) Government Technology - February 2008 - The Path to Success (Page S41) Government Technology - February 2008 - Foundation for Service (Page S42) Government Technology - February 2008 - Foundation for Service (Page S43) Government Technology - February 2008 - Foundation for Service (Page S44) Government Technology - February 2008 - Foundation for Service (Page S45) Government Technology - February 2008 - Foundation for Service (Page S46) Government Technology - February 2008 - Foundation for Service (Page S47) Government Technology - February 2008 - Foundation for Service (Page S48)
For optimal viewing of this digital publication, please enable JavaScript and then refresh the page. If you would like to try to load the digital publication without using Flash Player detection, please click here.