Government Technology - February 2008 - (Page 45) This laborious process could take several hours to finish. We knew there would be an immediate improvement in speed if an applicant didn’t have to come to city hall to submit a site plan. Plus, if an applicant didn’t have to submit a dozen copies of a plan, there would be substantial cost savings to both the applicant and the city. Site-Plan Automation Is Born The solution to our challenge came from an unexpected source — a software program from SIRE Technologies that was being used in the Cape Coral Clerk’s Office. Scott Craig, the business systems analyst in the clerk’s office, had used SIRE’s Electronic Document Management System (EDMS) for a few years to manage the city’s documents and workflow processes, with tremendous results. Between the clerk’s office and Cape Coral’s Department of Community spent about two hours of planning for every hour of implementation. Cathy McPeak, forms designer for the city, took the paper-based forms and created an electronic counterpart. The Site Plan Form involves quite a bit of information. She made a template in Microsoft Word and bookmarked all the fields so it was easy to integrate into the SIRE work forms. We now have a much simpler way to obtain information. Manny Ratliff, the city’s workflow designer, mapped workflow processes and integrated them into the system. Efficiency Upgrade The collaboration worked, and a new program was born. The SIRE Site Plan is now in operation. Contractors and design professionals now work with the city more efficiently than before. We start the process by issuing a PIN, which grants them access to the SIRE Cape Coral recycled 18.5 tons of paper in 2007, which illustrates how much space and cost savings can be created using electronic file management. Development, the city has added more than 5 million documents to the system. After observing SIRE’s capabilities, we decided to look at the product’s workflow portion and see what we could implement in our department. As we analyzed the product, we believed it could improve our process, so we created a workflow process to manage the stream of paperwork going to and from the city tax assessor’s office. Craig put together a process that made it possible to electronically scan, submit and approve the paperwork. We agreed that scanning the documents and sending them electronically was good. However, what if we could eliminate the scanning and have site plans submitted electronically by the customer? No one had ever done that, but SIRE representatives were optimistic that it could be accomplished. If we could map out the workflows and the forms, SIRE could program it for us. We gathered people from different disciplines at city hall to brainstorm and bring their best practices to the table. Planning was important for this system to work; the team program. They fill out online forms that check for errors, perform mathematical functions and help the applicant avoid mistakes when submitting. The applicant also uploads any additional paperwork, such as site drawings, plan sheets and other related documents. This triggers the application review workflow, which is forwarded automatically to the queue of the first reviewer. This reviewer checks the application for errors and confirms the documents have been uploaded. Once the prints are submitted electronically, a plans examiner receives and reviews them on 32-inch screens. The plans are approved or disapproved electronically. Comments are compiled within the workflow and sent to the applicant. Depending on the outcome, the workflow either ends or loops until all reviewers have approved and “stamped” the plans with an image that looks just like their rubber stamp. We also use the workflow for miscellaneous permits submitted in-person at city hall. A customer service representative accepts the application over the counter from applicants’ scans and uploads the documents into a workflow, which takes the application through the new electronic approval process. In the end, the files are all stored in the EDMS. Cape Coral recycled 18.5 tons of paper in 2007, which illustrates how much space and cost savings can be created using electronic file management. Moving the system to an electronic document format brought an added element of security to the city. With the electronic backup in place, the files are not at risk from a hurricane or other disaster. In addition, paper-based items can get lost. Previously, issued permits and documents were stored in a series of giant, mechanical file cabinets. To retrieve a file, we entered a file number on a keypad, and the file cabinet rotated and found the file. However, if the person who pulled the file did not place the “out” card in the right place, the file could be difficult to find again. Citywide e-mails would be sent by staff members who were looking for a particular permit, when the file was simply sitting on someone’s desk. With SIRE, several people can view the same file simultaneously. The file is electronic and cannot be lost. By incorporating these strategies, our customers can save up to $1,000 per application. In addition, time and paper resources are saved. We have realized a savings of 11,000 to 15,000 labor hours to date, and we expect to save from 20,000 to 30,000 hours as we continue to build the program. We also created more space in our buildings by reorganizing the office and eliminating more than 50 percent of our file cabinets because we no longer need to retain and store paper files. Our vision was to be a state leader in electronic document management, and we ended up setting an example for the rest of the United States. We are constantly helping other city and county governments that seek to emulate our system. When our director of community development asked me what we can expect to get out of this project, I said we will have the best site-plan application system in the world. I think we are well on our way to making that happen. JOE MASCARI IS THE BUSINESS SYSTEMS ANALYST AND WORKFLOW PROJECT MANAGER FOR THE CAPE CORAL DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT. 45 http://www.govtech.com
Table of Contents Feed for the Digital Edition of Government Technology - February 2008 Government Technology - February 2008 Contents Point of View Big Picture The Last Mile On the Screen Products Four Questions for... CSI Effect Bad Medicine Making Health Care Personal Cashing In GIS for Less Nabbing Speedsters First Person: Records Management Chatter Box Oregon Data Centers Go Green Products Two Cents Spectrum Up Close Personal Computing signal:noise Government Solutions - Spring 2008 Power Play Double Duty Cleaning House Twice Prepared Smart Move The Path to Success Foundation for Service Government Technology - February 2008 Government Technology - February 2008 - Government Technology - February 2008 (Page Cover1) Government Technology - February 2008 - Government Technology - February 2008 (Page Cover2) Government Technology - February 2008 - Government Technology - February 2008 (Page 3) Government Technology - February 2008 - Contents (Page 4) Government Technology - February 2008 - Contents (Page 5) Government Technology - February 2008 - Contents (Page 6) Government Technology - February 2008 - Contents (Page 7) Government Technology - February 2008 - Point of View (Page 8) Government Technology - February 2008 - Point of View (Page 9) Government Technology - February 2008 - Big Picture (Page 10) Government Technology - February 2008 - Big Picture (Page 11) Government Technology - February 2008 - The Last Mile (Page 12) Government Technology - February 2008 - The Last Mile (Page 13) Government Technology - February 2008 - Products (Page 14) Government Technology - February 2008 - Products (Page 15) Government Technology - February 2008 - Four Questions for... (Page 16) Government Technology - February 2008 - Four Questions for... (Page 17) Government Technology - February 2008 - CSI Effect (Page 18) Government Technology - February 2008 - CSI Effect (Page 19) Government Technology - February 2008 - CSI Effect (Page 20) Government Technology - February 2008 - CSI Effect (Page 21) Government Technology - February 2008 - CSI Effect (Page 22) Government Technology - February 2008 - CSI Effect (Page 23) Government Technology - February 2008 - CSI Effect (Page 24) Government Technology - February 2008 - CSI Effect (Page 25) Government Technology - February 2008 - Bad Medicine (Page 26) Government Technology - February 2008 - Bad Medicine (Page 27) Government Technology - February 2008 - Bad Medicine (Page 28) Government Technology - February 2008 - Bad Medicine (Page 29) Government Technology - February 2008 - Bad Medicine (Page 30) Government Technology - February 2008 - Bad Medicine (Page 31) Government Technology - February 2008 - Making Health Care Personal (Page 32) Government Technology - February 2008 - Making Health Care Personal (Page 33) Government Technology - February 2008 - Making Health Care Personal (Page 34) Government Technology - February 2008 - Making Health Care Personal (Page 35) Government Technology - February 2008 - Making Health Care Personal (Page 36) Government Technology - February 2008 - Making Health Care Personal (Page 37) Government Technology - February 2008 - Cashing In (Page 38) Government Technology - February 2008 - Cashing In (Page 39) Government Technology - February 2008 - GIS for Less (Page 40) Government Technology - February 2008 - GIS for Less (Page 41) Government Technology - February 2008 - Nabbing Speedsters (Page 42) Government Technology - February 2008 - Nabbing Speedsters (Page 43) Government Technology - February 2008 - First Person: Records Management (Page 44) Government Technology - February 2008 - First Person: Records Management (Page 45) Government Technology - February 2008 - Chatter Box (Page 46) Government Technology - February 2008 - Chatter Box (Page 47) Government Technology - February 2008 - Oregon Data Centers Go Green (Page 48) Government Technology - February 2008 - Oregon Data Centers Go Green (Page 49) Government Technology - February 2008 - Products (Page 50) Government Technology - February 2008 - Two Cents (Page 51) Government Technology - February 2008 - Spectrum (Page 52) Government Technology - February 2008 - Spectrum (Page 53) Government Technology - February 2008 - Up Close (Page 54) Government Technology - February 2008 - Up Close (Page 55) Government Technology - February 2008 - Personal Computing (Page 56) Government Technology - February 2008 - Personal Computing (Page 57) Government Technology - February 2008 - signal:noise (Page 58) Government Technology - February 2008 - signal:noise (Page Cover3) Government Technology - February 2008 - signal:noise (Page Cover4) Government Technology - February 2008 - Government Solutions - Spring 2008 (Page S1) Government Technology - February 2008 - Government Solutions - Spring 2008 (Page S2) Government Technology - February 2008 - Government Solutions - Spring 2008 (Page S3) Government Technology - February 2008 - Power Play (Page S4) Government Technology - February 2008 - Power Play (Page S5) Government Technology - February 2008 - Power Play (Page S6) Government Technology - February 2008 - Power Play (Page S7) Government Technology - February 2008 - Power Play (Page S8) Government Technology - February 2008 - Power Play (Page S9) Government Technology - February 2008 - Power Play (Page S10) Government Technology - February 2008 - Power Play (Page S11) Government Technology - February 2008 - Power Play (Page S12) Government Technology - February 2008 - Power Play (Page S13) Government Technology - February 2008 - Double Duty (Page S14) Government Technology - February 2008 - Double Duty (Page S15) Government Technology - February 2008 - Double Duty (Page S16) Government Technology - February 2008 - Double Duty (Page S17) Government Technology - February 2008 - Double Duty (Page S18) Government Technology - February 2008 - Double Duty (Page S19) Government Technology - February 2008 - Cleaning House (Page S20) Government Technology - February 2008 - Cleaning House (Page S21) Government Technology - February 2008 - Cleaning House (Page S22) Government Technology - February 2008 - Cleaning House (Page S23) Government Technology - February 2008 - Cleaning House (Page S24) Government Technology - February 2008 - Cleaning House (Page S25) Government Technology - February 2008 - Twice Prepared (Page S26) Government Technology - February 2008 - Twice Prepared (Page S27) Government Technology - February 2008 - Twice Prepared (Page S28) Government Technology - February 2008 - Twice Prepared (Page S29) Government Technology - February 2008 - Twice Prepared (Page S30) Government Technology - February 2008 - Twice Prepared (Page S31) Government Technology - February 2008 - Smart Move (Page S32) Government Technology - February 2008 - Smart Move (Page S33) Government Technology - February 2008 - Smart Move (Page S34) Government Technology - February 2008 - Smart Move (Page S35) Government Technology - February 2008 - Smart Move (Page S36) Government Technology - February 2008 - Smart Move (Page S37) Government Technology - February 2008 - The Path to Success (Page S38) Government Technology - February 2008 - The Path to Success (Page S39) Government Technology - February 2008 - The Path to Success (Page S40) Government Technology - February 2008 - The Path to Success (Page S41) Government Technology - February 2008 - Foundation for Service (Page S42) Government Technology - February 2008 - Foundation for Service (Page S43) Government Technology - February 2008 - Foundation for Service (Page S44) Government Technology - February 2008 - Foundation for Service (Page S45) Government Technology - February 2008 - Foundation for Service (Page S46) Government Technology - February 2008 - Foundation for Service (Page S47) Government Technology - February 2008 - Foundation for Service (Page S48)
For optimal viewing of this digital publication, please enable JavaScript and then refresh the page. If you would like to try to load the digital publication without using Flash Player detection, please click here.