Government Technology - March 2008 - (Page 36) Much interest in virtualization focuses on servers. One important reason data center managers create virtual servers is to consolidate facilities, running more applications on fewer physical boxes. That strategy offers several benefits, said Gary Chen, senior analyst with the Yankee Group. “No. 1, you’ll save money on hardware: You won’t have to buy as many servers. No. 2, you’ll save money on space.” Most government agencies and private companies pay for data centers based on square footage, he said. “No. 3, you’ll also save on power,” Chen added. That’s good for the environment as well as for the financial ledger, he said. Virtual servers also make it easy to troubleshoot hardware and plan for disaster recovery. Because virtual servers are simply software, if the box they’re running on experiences hiccups or crashes altogether, it’s easy to slide them onto another piece of hardware, leaving end-users none the wiser, Bengel said. Spin it up The server farm in Tennessee’s state government data center hosts 350 virtual machines. If a physical server breaks down entirely, the storage area network (SAN) that houses the virtual servers can send them to a different box, Bengel said. “It gives you tremendous flexibility to perform maintenance in the middle of the day, which you normally couldn’t ever do.” And if a disaster hits the data center, the SAN can send any virtual server to a backup location. “I can just spin it up at another farm at another site, and everything is intact, including the IP address.” Virtual servers work well for testing updates, code changes and patches, said Rob Campbell, senior technology specialist with the Microsoft Federal Team. They also reduce the amount of hardware a person needs to lug around when demonstrating applications, he said. “If I want to set up a demo environment that has multiple servers and clients interacting, I can do all of that on top of one laptop, because each of the demo machines can run in a virtual environment,” Campbell said. A virtual server also is an ideal platform for software developers who need a machine for a few months, said Max Arnold, Tennessee’s executive director of data center operations. “Once they have [the software] developed, they no longer require that server,” Arnold said. The data center can simply absorb the virtual server back into the farm. “So you’re not stuck with a large investment that you no longer need.” That’s just one example of the flexibility that makes virtual servers easier to manage than physical machines. Instead of requiring a computer and an operating system to run an application, you just need a few files, Chen said. “I can move them to any server that has the virtualization software installed on it, whether it’s local or half-way across the world. And you can do it just like copying files.” Leading companies that offer virtualization software include VMware, Microsoft, Oracle, IBM and Citrix. One thing virtual servers don’t do well is run large, demanding applications that need to move large streams of data through the CPU quickly. “The translation between the virtual hardware and the physical will have a performance hit,” Campbell said. “You should virtualize based on intended workload and the performance profile.” “If you have a large application that has a tremendous amount of I/O [input/output], whether it be a database, or an application server, virtualization may not be your best candidate,” Bengel said. More Machines, More Work Officials in Tennessee’s IT office became interested in virtualization when the state began working toward a centralized computing model. Back when client/server systems were in vogue, the volume of data passing over limited bandwidth prompted agencies to house servers in their own facilities. As network bandwidth grew more abundant and the client/server model gave way to Webbased applications, the state moved servers back into a central data center. That posed a problem for the data center: More machines meant more work for the technical team. “I wanted to be able to do consolidation while minimizing the amount of additional staff that I had to add to my data center,” Bengel said. By reducing the number of physical machines required in the center, virtualization allowed Tennessee to manage more servers with fewer employees. In the past, a systems analyst or systems programmer took charge of 25 to 30 machines, Arnold said. “Now I have upward of 70 machines per person.” The data center runs mostly Sun Fire X4600 machines, with an average of 25 virtual servers running on each dual-core box. There’s also a server farm with some single-core HP ProLiant DL580 servers, which average 10 virtual machines per box. The state uses VMware virtualization software. One of the initial challenges Tennessee IT officials faced as they implemented virtual servers was determining which applications would run well, and which made too many demands on the software. “We had to do some experimentation to find out,” Bengel said. They discovered that a virtual machine makes a great Web server or application server and can handle a small database, he said. “It doesn’t make quite as much sense with really big applications — although even with, for example, our Web servers on our [enterprise resource planning] application, which is one of the largest in MAR 08 JAN__08 36 http://www.govtech.com
Table of Contents Feed for the Digital Edition of Government Technology - March 2008 Government Technology - March 2008 Contents Point of View Big Picture The Last Mile On the Scene Four Questions for... Top 25 Doers, Dreamers and Drivers Let's [Not] Get Physical No Data Left Behind Conservation King Community Drug Test Reinventing the System Better Late Than Never Closing the Deal Spectrum Products Personal Computing signal:noise Digital Communities The Expanding Focus of Digital Communities The Digital Imperative Hot Fusion Redefining Municipal Wireless Made in the USA Bridge Detectives The 2008 Agenda Government Technology - March 2008 Government Technology - March 2008 - Government Technology - March 2008 (Page 1) Government Technology - March 2008 - Government Technology - March 2008 (Page 2) Government Technology - March 2008 - Government Technology - March 2008 (Page 3) Government Technology - March 2008 - Contents (Page 4) Government Technology - March 2008 - Contents (Page 5) Government Technology - March 2008 - Contents (Page 6) Government Technology - March 2008 - Contents (Page 7) Government Technology - March 2008 - Point of View (Page 8) Government Technology - March 2008 - Point of View (Page 9) Government Technology - March 2008 - Big Picture (Page 10) Government Technology - March 2008 - Big Picture (Page 11) Government Technology - March 2008 - The Last Mile (Page 12) Government Technology - March 2008 - The Last Mile (Page 13) Government Technology - March 2008 - On the Scene (Page 14) Government Technology - March 2008 - On the Scene (Page 15) Government Technology - March 2008 - Four Questions for... (Page 16) Government Technology - March 2008 - Four Questions for... (Page 17) Government Technology - March 2008 - Top 25 Doers, Dreamers and Drivers (Page 18) Government Technology - March 2008 - Top 25 Doers, Dreamers and Drivers (Page 19) Government Technology - March 2008 - Top 25 Doers, Dreamers and Drivers (Page 20) Government Technology - March 2008 - Top 25 Doers, Dreamers and Drivers (Page 21) Government Technology - March 2008 - Top 25 Doers, Dreamers and Drivers (Page 22) Government Technology - March 2008 - Top 25 Doers, Dreamers and Drivers (Page 23) Government Technology - March 2008 - Top 25 Doers, Dreamers and Drivers (Page 24) Government Technology - March 2008 - Top 25 Doers, Dreamers and Drivers (Page 25) Government Technology - March 2008 - Top 25 Doers, Dreamers and Drivers (Page 26) Government Technology - March 2008 - Top 25 Doers, Dreamers and Drivers (Page 27) Government Technology - March 2008 - Top 25 Doers, Dreamers and Drivers (Page 28) Government Technology - March 2008 - Top 25 Doers, Dreamers and Drivers (Page 29) Government Technology - March 2008 - Top 25 Doers, Dreamers and Drivers (Page 30) Government Technology - March 2008 - Top 25 Doers, Dreamers and Drivers (Page 31) Government Technology - March 2008 - Top 25 Doers, Dreamers and Drivers (Page 32) Government Technology - March 2008 - Top 25 Doers, Dreamers and Drivers (Page 33) Government Technology - March 2008 - Let's [Not] Get Physical (Page 34) Government Technology - March 2008 - Let's [Not] Get Physical (Page 35) Government Technology - March 2008 - Let's [Not] Get Physical (Page 36) Government Technology - March 2008 - Let's [Not] Get Physical (Page 37) Government Technology - March 2008 - No Data Left Behind (Page 38) Government Technology - March 2008 - No Data Left Behind (Page 39) Government Technology - March 2008 - Conservation King (Page 40) Government Technology - March 2008 - Conservation King (Page 41) Government Technology - March 2008 - Community Drug Test (Page 42) Government Technology - March 2008 - Community Drug Test (Page 43) Government Technology - March 2008 - Reinventing the System (Page 44) Government Technology - March 2008 - Reinventing the System (Page 45) Government Technology - March 2008 - Reinventing the System (Page 46) Government Technology - March 2008 - Reinventing the System (Page 47) Government Technology - March 2008 - Better Late Than Never (Page 48) Government Technology - March 2008 - Better Late Than Never (Page 49) Government Technology - March 2008 - Closing the Deal (Page 50) Government Technology - March 2008 - Closing the Deal (Page NOVELL1) Government Technology - March 2008 - Closing the Deal (Page NOVELL2) Government Technology - March 2008 - Closing the Deal (Page NOVELL3) Government Technology - March 2008 - Closing the Deal (Page NOVELL4) Government Technology - March 2008 - Closing the Deal (Page 51) Government Technology - March 2008 - Spectrum (Page 52) Government Technology - March 2008 - Spectrum (Page 53) Government Technology - March 2008 - Products (Page 54) Government Technology - March 2008 - Products (Page 55) Government Technology - March 2008 - Personal Computing (Page 56) Government Technology - March 2008 - Personal Computing (Page 57) Government Technology - March 2008 - signal:noise (Page 58) Government Technology - March 2008 - signal:noise (Page 59) Government Technology - March 2008 - signal:noise (Page 60) Government Technology - March 2008 - Digital Communities (Page DC1) Government Technology - March 2008 - Digital Communities (Page DC2) Government Technology - March 2008 - The Expanding Focus of Digital Communities (Page DC3) Government Technology - March 2008 - The Expanding Focus of Digital Communities (Page DC4) Government Technology - March 2008 - The Expanding Focus of Digital Communities (Page DC5) Government Technology - March 2008 - The Digital Imperative (Page DC6) Government Technology - March 2008 - The Digital Imperative (Page DC7) Government Technology - March 2008 - The Digital Imperative (Page DC8) Government Technology - March 2008 - The Digital Imperative (Page DC9) Government Technology - March 2008 - The Digital Imperative (Page DC10) Government Technology - March 2008 - The Digital Imperative (Page DC11) Government Technology - March 2008 - Hot Fusion (Page DC12) Government Technology - March 2008 - Hot Fusion (Page DC13) Government Technology - March 2008 - Hot Fusion (Page DC14) Government Technology - March 2008 - Hot Fusion (Page DC15) Government Technology - March 2008 - Hot Fusion (Page DC16) Government Technology - March 2008 - Hot Fusion (Page DC17) Government Technology - March 2008 - Redefining Municipal Wireless (Page DC18) Government Technology - March 2008 - Redefining Municipal Wireless (Page DC19) Government Technology - March 2008 - Redefining Municipal Wireless (Page DC20) Government Technology - March 2008 - Redefining Municipal Wireless (Page DC21) Government Technology - March 2008 - Made in the USA (Page DC22) Government Technology - March 2008 - Made in the USA (Page DC23) Government Technology - March 2008 - Made in the USA (Page DC24) Government Technology - March 2008 - Made in the USA (Page DC25) Government Technology - March 2008 - Bridge Detectives (Page DC26) Government Technology - March 2008 - Bridge Detectives (Page DC27) Government Technology - March 2008 - Bridge Detectives (Page DC28) Government Technology - March 2008 - Bridge Detectives (Page DC29) Government Technology - March 2008 - The 2008 Agenda (Page DC30) Government Technology - March 2008 - The 2008 Agenda (Page DC31) Government Technology - March 2008 - The 2008 Agenda (Page DC32)
For optimal viewing of this digital publication, please enable JavaScript and then refresh the page. If you would like to try to load the digital publication without using Flash Player detection, please click here.