Government Technology - April 2008 - (Page CA6) which projects should have priority for funding and staffing. “It should really enhance IT governance for the City.” Cosgrave expects PPM to have a big impact on his department’s effectiveness and ability to deliver services. Although figures won’t be available until later, cost reductions are also expected. “I think we’re going to get very good savings, very good benefit out of this,” Cosgrave said. DoITT has hundreds of projects going on at any one time. Cosgrave said if just a few of those projects are better managed, the savings could be substantial. The Right Choices Cosgrave believes CA Clarity™ PPM will assist his department in choosing the right projects, manage risks and allocate resources. Better visibility across all projects could help eliminate redundant technologies. There could also be better handoffs of projects between organizations. Cosgrave expects to see around a 10 percent improvement in productivity. Cordell Schachter is DoITT’s Chief Project Officer and Associate Commissioner. He’s directing DoITT’s CA Clarity™ PPM implementation and helping other agencies do the same. Schachter said getting project information into CA Clarity™ PPM allows everyone from project managers to executives to access the information they need. The tool also requires managers to be thorough. “Clarity makes you document your workflow, from the project’s idea stage through the decision gate. It also helps determine whether the project offers the proper return on investment to proceed for the level of risk, and the amount of resources that it needs. Finally it enables visibility to each project’s implementation, control activities and closure activities,” Schachter said. is to reduce either the likelihood or the impact of that risk.” DoITT also configured CA Clarity™ PPM so it can easily show executives which projects need extra attention. “We’ve created a system called the ‘Project Health Scorecard,’ which provides a quantitative assessment across about a half-dozen categories with factual criteria, using Clarity as the mechanism where information is entered and the assessment is made,” said Schachter. “From there, we’ve created dashboards that allow executives and managers to scan projects and their scores.” The tool also helps keep all projects aligned with the Mayor’s “themes,” said “Clarity makes you document your workflow, from the project’s idea stage through the decision gate.” — Cordell Schachter, Chief Project Officer and Associate Commissioner, New York City Department of Information Technology and Telecommunications From there, reports can be produced, performance trends can be observed and DoITT can gauge whether projects are getting the proper return on investment. “Having the information in a database designed to allow this reporting and analysis really only exists in a PPM tool like Clarity,” Schachter observed. Better Tool, Better Alignment Project managers are required to enter data into CA Clarity™ PPM every day. That keeps the project information flowing much faster. It also makes it easier to detect and deal with risk. “The way we’ve configured the tool requires each project manager to state the risks that are known to them,” Schachter noted. “Once a risk statement is made, we look for a management plan to deal with that risk should a trigger event occur. And part of that management strategy Cosgrave. Projects, and sometimes even tasks, are tagged to specific themes and desired outcomes from the Mayor’s overall direction for the City. “Making sure we’re aligned with the priorities of the Mayor, the Deputy Mayors and agency heads is absolutely critical to what we’re doing here,” Cosgrave said. As with many public-sector entities, PPM is the answer for New York City. “It’s a way to keep tabs on what’s going on across a hundred different agencies in the City, as well as the hundreds of projects that my own organization is taking on at any given time,” said Cosgrave. “It’s pretty significant, in terms of the number of events we’re trying to track here. We have a responsibility to our customers — the City and its taxpayers — to maximize our IT investments, and we look to PPM and Clarity to help us do that.” ❖ 6 ADVERTISING SUPPLEMENT
Table of Contents Feed for the Digital Edition of Government Technology - April 2008 Government Technology - April 2008 Contents Point of View Big Picture The Last Mile On the Scene Four Questions for... Freeze Frame How Safe Is Your Data? Easy Street Gadget Overload Indiana Overhaul First Person: A Better Bill Data Defense Strength in Numbers Public Storage Products Two Cents Spectrum Personal Computing signal:noise Government Technology - April 2008 Government Technology - April 2008 - Government Technology - April 2008 (Page 1) Government Technology - April 2008 - Government Technology - April 2008 (Page 2) Government Technology - April 2008 - Government Technology - April 2008 (Page 3) Government Technology - April 2008 - Contents (Page 4) Government Technology - April 2008 - Contents (Page 5) Government Technology - April 2008 - Contents (Page 6) Government Technology - April 2008 - Contents (Page 7) Government Technology - April 2008 - Point of View (Page 8) Government Technology - April 2008 - Point of View (Page 9) Government Technology - April 2008 - Big Picture (Page 10) Government Technology - April 2008 - Big Picture (Page 11) Government Technology - April 2008 - The Last Mile (Page 12) Government Technology - April 2008 - The Last Mile (Page 13) Government Technology - April 2008 - On the Scene (Page 14) Government Technology - April 2008 - On the Scene (Page 15) Government Technology - April 2008 - Four Questions for... (Page 16) Government Technology - April 2008 - Four Questions for... (Page 17) Government Technology - April 2008 - Freeze Frame (Page 18) Government Technology - April 2008 - Freeze Frame (Page 19) Government Technology - April 2008 - Freeze Frame (Page 20) Government Technology - April 2008 - Freeze Frame (Page 21) Government Technology - April 2008 - Freeze Frame (Page 22) Government Technology - April 2008 - Freeze Frame (Page 23) Government Technology - April 2008 - Freeze Frame (Page 24) Government Technology - April 2008 - Freeze Frame (Page 25) Government Technology - April 2008 - How Safe Is Your Data? (Page 26) Government Technology - April 2008 - How Safe Is Your Data? (Page H1) Government Technology - April 2008 - How Safe Is Your Data? (Page H2) Government Technology - April 2008 - How Safe Is Your Data? (Page 27) Government Technology - April 2008 - How Safe Is Your Data? (Page 28) Government Technology - April 2008 - How Safe Is Your Data? (Page 29) Government Technology - April 2008 - How Safe Is Your Data? (Page 30) Government Technology - April 2008 - How Safe Is Your Data? (Page 31) Government Technology - April 2008 - Easy Street (Page 32) Government Technology - April 2008 - Easy Street (Page 33) Government Technology - April 2008 - Easy Street (Page 34) Government Technology - April 2008 - Easy Street (Page 35) Government Technology - April 2008 - Gadget Overload (Page 36) Government Technology - April 2008 - Gadget Overload (Page 37) Government Technology - April 2008 - Gadget Overload (Page 38) Government Technology - April 2008 - Gadget Overload (Page 39) Government Technology - April 2008 - Indiana Overhaul (Page 40) Government Technology - April 2008 - Indiana Overhaul (Page 41) Government Technology - April 2008 - First Person: A Better Bill (Page 42) Government Technology - April 2008 - First Person: A Better Bill (Page CA1) Government Technology - April 2008 - First Person: A Better Bill (Page CA2) Government Technology - April 2008 - First Person: A Better Bill (Page CA3) Government Technology - April 2008 - First Person: A Better Bill (Page CA4) Government Technology - April 2008 - First Person: A Better Bill (Page CA5) Government Technology - April 2008 - First Person: A Better Bill (Page CA6) Government Technology - April 2008 - First Person: A Better Bill (Page CA7) Government Technology - April 2008 - First Person: A Better Bill (Page CA8) Government Technology - April 2008 - First Person: A Better Bill (Page 43) Government Technology - April 2008 - Data Defense (Page 44) Government Technology - April 2008 - Data Defense (Page 45) Government Technology - April 2008 - Strength in Numbers (Page 46) Government Technology - April 2008 - Strength in Numbers (Page 47) Government Technology - April 2008 - Public Storage (Page 48) Government Technology - April 2008 - Public Storage (Page 49) Government Technology - April 2008 - Public Storage (Page 50) Government Technology - April 2008 - Public Storage (Page 51) Government Technology - April 2008 - Products (Page 52) Government Technology - April 2008 - Two Cents (Page 53) Government Technology - April 2008 - Spectrum (Page 54) Government Technology - April 2008 - Spectrum (Page NW1) Government Technology - April 2008 - Spectrum (Page NW2) Government Technology - April 2008 - Spectrum (Page NW3) Government Technology - April 2008 - Spectrum (Page NW4) Government Technology - April 2008 - Personal Computing (Page 55) Government Technology - April 2008 - signal:noise (Page 56) Government Technology - April 2008 - signal:noise (Page 57) Government Technology - April 2008 - signal:noise (Page 58) Government Technology - April 2008 - signal:noise (Page 59) Government Technology - April 2008 - signal:noise (Page 60)
For optimal viewing of this digital publication, please enable JavaScript and then refresh the page. If you would like to try to load the digital publication without using Flash Player detection, please click here.