Government Technology - April 2008 - (Page 51) C O N T I N U E D F R O M PAG E 41 The FSSA wanted 1,500 of its 2,200-person work force to become IBM employees. The agency required IBM to offer all 1,500 employees jobs for a minimum of two years at the same pay and benefits they received from the state. Main also said the Texas HHSC tried to change too much too quickly. “They tried to change the way they did business by instituting different process models. They tried to replace their core legacy computer system. They tried to change some of the rules of eligibility on some of their most popular programs. And they tried to lay off a third of their work force all at the same time,” Main said. Stephanie Goodman, a spokeswoman for the HHSC, said the agency attempted such an ambitious plan simply because it had a lot to change. Texas’ outdated system hadn’t changed in nearly four decades, and colleges no longer taught COBOL, the system’s programming language. The system needed quick, drastic modernization before the state ran out of COBOL programmers. “There are also special challenges in dealing with a population as large and diverse as we have in Texas. We have 2.3 million food stamp recipients,” Goodman said. “I suspect that’s a few more than Indiana.” New Focus Main said the role of FSSA’s leaders changed to focus on contract management rather than traditional operations management. “We’ve changed the mission of the Indiana Family and Social Services Administration,” Main said.The agency’s primary focus needs to be contract management, he said, because 92 percent of the agency’s $7 billion budget is contracted out. The pilot version of the IBM contract is under way in 12 counties. “Anytime you do a pilot,” he said, “you make certain guesses on the number of people who are going to access the system through each different kind of channel.” Main said call volume was double what was expected. The FSSA planned for phone hold times to be only 90 seconds. Instead, they average roughly 5 minutes, Main said. However, he said when call center operators answer the calls and apologize for those wait times, they often receive surprising responses. “[Clients] say, ‘Are you kidding me? Five minutes on the phone? I waited 10 minutes at the bus stop just to catch the first of two buses I needed to take to the county welfare office. This is incredibly convenient for us.’” 51 Research Emergency Command Central Solutions Find Best Value Solutions Search State Contracts Review Peer Best Practices Powered by Find Critical Solutions From Trusted Names in the Industry. Visit www.govtech.com/productsource http://www.govtech.com/productsource http://www.govtech.com/productsource http://www.govtech.com
Table of Contents Feed for the Digital Edition of Government Technology - April 2008 Government Technology - April 2008 Contents Point of View Big Picture The Last Mile On the Scene Four Questions for... Freeze Frame How Safe Is Your Data? Easy Street Gadget Overload Indiana Overhaul First Person: A Better Bill Data Defense Strength in Numbers Public Storage Products Two Cents Spectrum Personal Computing signal:noise Government Technology - April 2008 Government Technology - April 2008 - Government Technology - April 2008 (Page 1) Government Technology - April 2008 - Government Technology - April 2008 (Page 2) Government Technology - April 2008 - Government Technology - April 2008 (Page 3) Government Technology - April 2008 - Contents (Page 4) Government Technology - April 2008 - Contents (Page 5) Government Technology - April 2008 - Contents (Page 6) Government Technology - April 2008 - Contents (Page 7) Government Technology - April 2008 - Point of View (Page 8) Government Technology - April 2008 - Point of View (Page 9) Government Technology - April 2008 - Big Picture (Page 10) Government Technology - April 2008 - Big Picture (Page 11) Government Technology - April 2008 - The Last Mile (Page 12) Government Technology - April 2008 - The Last Mile (Page 13) Government Technology - April 2008 - On the Scene (Page 14) Government Technology - April 2008 - On the Scene (Page 15) Government Technology - April 2008 - Four Questions for... (Page 16) Government Technology - April 2008 - Four Questions for... (Page 17) Government Technology - April 2008 - Freeze Frame (Page 18) Government Technology - April 2008 - Freeze Frame (Page 19) Government Technology - April 2008 - Freeze Frame (Page 20) Government Technology - April 2008 - Freeze Frame (Page 21) Government Technology - April 2008 - Freeze Frame (Page 22) Government Technology - April 2008 - Freeze Frame (Page 23) Government Technology - April 2008 - Freeze Frame (Page 24) Government Technology - April 2008 - Freeze Frame (Page 25) Government Technology - April 2008 - How Safe Is Your Data? (Page 26) Government Technology - April 2008 - How Safe Is Your Data? (Page H1) Government Technology - April 2008 - How Safe Is Your Data? (Page H2) Government Technology - April 2008 - How Safe Is Your Data? (Page 27) Government Technology - April 2008 - How Safe Is Your Data? (Page 28) Government Technology - April 2008 - How Safe Is Your Data? (Page 29) Government Technology - April 2008 - How Safe Is Your Data? (Page 30) Government Technology - April 2008 - How Safe Is Your Data? (Page 31) Government Technology - April 2008 - Easy Street (Page 32) Government Technology - April 2008 - Easy Street (Page 33) Government Technology - April 2008 - Easy Street (Page 34) Government Technology - April 2008 - Easy Street (Page 35) Government Technology - April 2008 - Gadget Overload (Page 36) Government Technology - April 2008 - Gadget Overload (Page 37) Government Technology - April 2008 - Gadget Overload (Page 38) Government Technology - April 2008 - Gadget Overload (Page 39) Government Technology - April 2008 - Indiana Overhaul (Page 40) Government Technology - April 2008 - Indiana Overhaul (Page 41) Government Technology - April 2008 - First Person: A Better Bill (Page 42) Government Technology - April 2008 - First Person: A Better Bill (Page CA1) Government Technology - April 2008 - First Person: A Better Bill (Page CA2) Government Technology - April 2008 - First Person: A Better Bill (Page CA3) Government Technology - April 2008 - First Person: A Better Bill (Page CA4) Government Technology - April 2008 - First Person: A Better Bill (Page CA5) Government Technology - April 2008 - First Person: A Better Bill (Page CA6) Government Technology - April 2008 - First Person: A Better Bill (Page CA7) Government Technology - April 2008 - First Person: A Better Bill (Page CA8) Government Technology - April 2008 - First Person: A Better Bill (Page 43) Government Technology - April 2008 - Data Defense (Page 44) Government Technology - April 2008 - Data Defense (Page 45) Government Technology - April 2008 - Strength in Numbers (Page 46) Government Technology - April 2008 - Strength in Numbers (Page 47) Government Technology - April 2008 - Public Storage (Page 48) Government Technology - April 2008 - Public Storage (Page 49) Government Technology - April 2008 - Public Storage (Page 50) Government Technology - April 2008 - Public Storage (Page 51) Government Technology - April 2008 - Products (Page 52) Government Technology - April 2008 - Two Cents (Page 53) Government Technology - April 2008 - Spectrum (Page 54) Government Technology - April 2008 - Spectrum (Page NW1) Government Technology - April 2008 - Spectrum (Page NW2) Government Technology - April 2008 - Spectrum (Page NW3) Government Technology - April 2008 - Spectrum (Page NW4) Government Technology - April 2008 - Personal Computing (Page 55) Government Technology - April 2008 - signal:noise (Page 56) Government Technology - April 2008 - signal:noise (Page 57) Government Technology - April 2008 - signal:noise (Page 58) Government Technology - April 2008 - signal:noise (Page 59) Government Technology - April 2008 - signal:noise (Page 60)
For optimal viewing of this digital publication, please enable JavaScript and then refresh the page. If you would like to try to load the digital publication without using Flash Player detection, please click here.