Government Technology - June 2008 - (Page 46) public safety What’s a Layer 2 Network? A Layer 2 network is like what you might use in your office — it’s a flat network where all the participating machines can communicate without the need for a router, said Matthew Prough, MultiJurisdictional Public Safety Information System system administrator. “In contrast, a Layer 3 network is one in which separate networks exist, each with their own unique address space,” he said. “To make a host on one network talk to a host on a different network, you need to have routers.” In cases where different locations are connected, a Layer 3 network setup is common, with individual networks and different network addresses at each location. However, a Layer 3 network takes additional work to manage because of the multiple networks involved, Prough said. And in the instance of a server failure, the backup server would need to be reconfigured. That’s not the case in a Layer 2 network environment, where the backup server would automatically assume the same address as the primary server. “Having a Layer 2 network across our sites makes management easier, because no matter which city you are in, you are on the same network subnet. This becomes very beneficial when you start talking about business continuity,” said Prough. 46 JUNE_08 For the MPSIS, the choice hinged on price. “The two that included encryption options external to the wireless radios were significantly less expensive,” Prough said. The cities tapped CommConnect for the wireless connection and took CommConnect’s advice to enlist third-party vendor CipherOptics for the encryption. CipherOptics proposed its CipherEngine to meet MPSIS’s cost and performance requirements. In addition to encrypting traffic on the Layer 2 switched network, the MPSIS called on CipherOptics to segment the nonencrypted traffic from the Fitchburg Fire Department, so the fire department would connect via half of the Fitchburg Police Department link, thereby consolidating the two existing links that used the same water tower. This created a serious challenge for the MPSIS because typically everything that goes with encrypted data gets encrypted, said Brian Irish, CipherOptics’ marketing director. To deal with the problem, CipherOptics implemented two virtual local area networks (VLANs) using encryption, Irish said. This capability wasn’t always available. “In the past, encryption and VLANs have been like oil and water,” he said. The solution gave Prough what he was looking for — the power to dictate which data gets encrypted, he said. “This deployment has been a great example of how municipalities can get security as they transmit data in a way that works for them,” Irish said. Implementation of the encryption onto the network was a snap for Prough. CipherOptics talked Prough through the software configuration, and he did the work himself. Prough said he’s had no trouble making encryption modifications to the wireless paths, even when operating from a remote location. The simplicity of the system and additional savings, especially on the operational side, have made the encryption solution valuable to the MPSIS, Prough said. The entire wireless system cost approximately $200,000, with the encryption portion about $35,000 of that total, said Fitchburg Chief of Police Thomas Blatter. The MPSIS received more than $1.1 million in federal grant money since 2004, which played a big role in implementing the joint software and recent upgrades. U.S. Rep. Tammy Baldwin, D-Madison, played a key role in landing those grants, Blatter said. “The federal government can provide valuable financial and moral support by encouraging and assisting this type of intercommunity cooperation for the public good,” Baldwin’s spokeswoman said. Consortium Formation The MPSIS was originally formed in late 2003 to replace three aging records management systems. Other software items were included in the original project like police dispatch software (Global Dispatch) and mobile data software (Global mReach), which together were “pretty inclusive of what police departments need on a daily basis,” Prough said. The records management system, Global Justice, took time to roll out because of the difficulty of converting data from the three separate systems, said Phil Sisk, president of Global Software Corp., MPSIS’s software provider. The result was worth it. The records management system, which was in full use by November 2005, is central to the police departments’ functions, Prough said. The system shares and stores incident, accident, citation, arrest and evidence information from the three departments — it basically gives officers more information to fight crime, Sisk said. The availability and accessibility of information helps officers do more in the car (on squad car computers), and they don’t have to enter data twice. “These communities deal with the same issues and often the same people,” Sisk said. “They have a better picture of whom and what they are dealing with when they share this type of information.” While the founding goal of the MPSIS was to purchase and implement a shared records management system, the objective naturally progressed; the cities looked into other components that fit within the joint framework and its existing systems, Prough said. For example, the trio purchased a digital dictation system, municipal court software and fingerprint identification technology — all woven into the records management system. Prough said the collaborative framework gives the cities access to new technologies and services that would’ve otherwise been unattainable. It also encouraged the police departments to join forces in other areas like training. A key part of working together, Prough said, is to give all cities a say, but let no single city have too much control. However, democratizing the process has its downside. “Any changes they wanted to make had to be voted on and agreed to by the group as a whole,” Prough said, “but it can work if you can work through that — the consolidation can be very successful.” A future goal of the MPSIS is to provide some data access to the public, such as the locations and types of service calls the departments receive. The MPSIS is also open to the idea of other police departments coming on board. The MPSIS’s high-speed wireless network and encryption upgrades are tailored to be flexible and scalable. Prough put it this way: “Since everybody is doing it the same way, it makes sense to build that out a little further.” http://www.govtech.com
Table of Contents Feed for the Digital Edition of Government Technology - June 2008 Government Technology - June 2008 Contents Point of View The Last Mile Big Picture On the Scene Four Questions For... 3 Technologies That May Change Your Job ...And Your Life Loosening Medicaid's Grip Better Living Through Technology Immersive Itineraries Help Yourself Taking the Bait Shared Connection Up Close Spectrum Products Personal Computing signal:noise Digital Communities Contents Digital Tactics for a U.S. Recession E-Dilemma Stifling Community Innovation Leadership Interview Estonia Becomes E-Stonia If It Were Up to Me … Government Technology - June 2008 Government Technology - June 2008 - Government Technology - June 2008 (Page 1) Government Technology - June 2008 - Government Technology - June 2008 (Page 2) Government Technology - June 2008 - Contents (Page 3) Government Technology - June 2008 - Contents (Page 4) Government Technology - June 2008 - Contents (Page 5) Government Technology - June 2008 - Point of View (Page 6) Government Technology - June 2008 - Point of View (Page 7) Government Technology - June 2008 - The Last Mile (Page 8) Government Technology - June 2008 - The Last Mile (Page 9) Government Technology - June 2008 - Big Picture (Page 10) Government Technology - June 2008 - Big Picture (Page GD1) Government Technology - June 2008 - Big Picture (Page GD2) Government Technology - June 2008 - Big Picture (Page 11) Government Technology - June 2008 - On the Scene (Page 12) Government Technology - June 2008 - On the Scene (Page 13) Government Technology - June 2008 - Four Questions For... (Page 14) Government Technology - June 2008 - Four Questions For... (Page 15) Government Technology - June 2008 - 3 Technologies That May Change Your Job ...And Your Life (Page 16) Government Technology - June 2008 - 3 Technologies That May Change Your Job ...And Your Life (Page 17) Government Technology - June 2008 - 3 Technologies That May Change Your Job ...And Your Life (Page 18) Government Technology - June 2008 - 3 Technologies That May Change Your Job ...And Your Life (Page 19) Government Technology - June 2008 - 3 Technologies That May Change Your Job ...And Your Life (Page 20) Government Technology - June 2008 - 3 Technologies That May Change Your Job ...And Your Life (Page 21) Government Technology - June 2008 - Loosening Medicaid's Grip (Page 22) Government Technology - June 2008 - Loosening Medicaid's Grip (Page 23) Government Technology - June 2008 - Loosening Medicaid's Grip (Page 24) Government Technology - June 2008 - Loosening Medicaid's Grip (Page 25) Government Technology - June 2008 - Loosening Medicaid's Grip (Page 26) Government Technology - June 2008 - Loosening Medicaid's Grip (Page 27) Government Technology - June 2008 - Better Living Through Technology (Page 28) Government Technology - June 2008 - Better Living Through Technology (Page 29) Government Technology - June 2008 - Better Living Through Technology (Page 30) Government Technology - June 2008 - Better Living Through Technology (Page 31) Government Technology - June 2008 - Better Living Through Technology (Page 32) Government Technology - June 2008 - Better Living Through Technology (Page 33) Government Technology - June 2008 - Better Living Through Technology (Page 34) Government Technology - June 2008 - Better Living Through Technology (Page 35) Government Technology - June 2008 - Immersive Itineraries (Page 36) Government Technology - June 2008 - Immersive Itineraries (Page 37) Government Technology - June 2008 - Immersive Itineraries (Page 38) Government Technology - June 2008 - Immersive Itineraries (Page 39) Government Technology - June 2008 - Help Yourself (Page 40) Government Technology - June 2008 - Help Yourself (Page 41) Government Technology - June 2008 - Taking the Bait (Page 42) Government Technology - June 2008 - Taking the Bait (Page Intel1) Government Technology - June 2008 - Taking the Bait (Page Intel2) Government Technology - June 2008 - Taking the Bait (Page Intel3) Government Technology - June 2008 - Taking the Bait (Page Intel4) Government Technology - June 2008 - Taking the Bait (Page 43) Government Technology - June 2008 - Shared Connection (Page 44) Government Technology - June 2008 - Shared Connection (Page 45) Government Technology - June 2008 - Shared Connection (Page 46) Government Technology - June 2008 - Shared Connection (Page 47) Government Technology - June 2008 - Up Close (Page 48) Government Technology - June 2008 - Up Close (Page 49) Government Technology - June 2008 - Spectrum (Page 50) Government Technology - June 2008 - Spectrum (Page 51) Government Technology - June 2008 - Products (Page 52) Government Technology - June 2008 - Products (Page 53) Government Technology - June 2008 - Products (Page 54) Government Technology - June 2008 - Products (Page 55) Government Technology - June 2008 - Personal Computing (Page 56) Government Technology - June 2008 - Personal Computing (Page 57) Government Technology - June 2008 - signal:noise (Page 58) Government Technology - June 2008 - signal:noise (Page 59) Government Technology - June 2008 - signal:noise (Page 60) Government Technology - June 2008 - Digital Communities (Page DC1) Government Technology - June 2008 - Digital Communities (Page DC2) Government Technology - June 2008 - Contents (Page DC3) Government Technology - June 2008 - Digital Tactics for a U.S. Recession (Page DC4) Government Technology - June 2008 - Digital Tactics for a U.S. Recession (Page DC5) Government Technology - June 2008 - E-Dilemma (Page DC6) Government Technology - June 2008 - E-Dilemma (Page DC7) Government Technology - June 2008 - E-Dilemma (Page DC8) Government Technology - June 2008 - E-Dilemma (Page DC9) Government Technology - June 2008 - E-Dilemma (Page DC10) Government Technology - June 2008 - E-Dilemma (Page DC11) Government Technology - June 2008 - Stifling Community Innovation (Page DC12) Government Technology - June 2008 - Stifling Community Innovation (Page DC13) Government Technology - June 2008 - Stifling Community Innovation (Page DC14) Government Technology - June 2008 - Stifling Community Innovation (Page DC15) Government Technology - June 2008 - Stifling Community Innovation (Page DC16) Government Technology - June 2008 - Stifling Community Innovation (Page DC17) Government Technology - June 2008 - Leadership Interview (Page DC18) Government Technology - June 2008 - Leadership Interview (Page DC19) Government Technology - June 2008 - Leadership Interview (Page DC20) Government Technology - June 2008 - Leadership Interview (Page DC21) Government Technology - June 2008 - Leadership Interview (Page DC22) Government Technology - June 2008 - Leadership Interview (Page DC23) Government Technology - June 2008 - Leadership Interview (Page DC24) Government Technology - June 2008 - Leadership Interview (Page DC25) Government Technology - June 2008 - Estonia Becomes E-Stonia (Page DC26) Government Technology - June 2008 - Estonia Becomes E-Stonia (Page DC27) Government Technology - June 2008 - If It Were Up to Me … (Page DC28) Government Technology - June 2008 - If It Were Up to Me … (Page DC29) Government Technology - June 2008 - If It Were Up to Me … (Page DC30) Government Technology - June 2008 - If It Were Up to Me … (Page DC31) Government Technology - June 2008 - If It Were Up to Me … (Page DC32)
For optimal viewing of this digital publication, please enable JavaScript and then refresh the page. If you would like to try to load the digital publication without using Flash Player detection, please click here.