Government Technology - August 2008 - (Page 52) security virtual traffic can lead to security lapses and “blind spots” — areas people can’t see in the infrastructure. It’s not unusual for networks to be so vast that people lose track of which virtual machine runs what application. This problem can be solved, but at times, it may not be that pressing of an issue. “There are very rare cases where customers need full visibility of every sort of piece of traffic going between machines,” said Nand Mulchandani, VMware’s senior director of product management and marketing. In normal physical data centers, no one views traffic because it’s not cost effective. “So when you move to a virtual environment, the loss of that visibility is actually not that big a deal,” Mulchandani said. In this example, one physical server acts as several virtual machines. Virtual Machines App. OS App. OS App. OS Virtual World Attackers Software that manages virtual machines is called the “hypervisor.” When installed on a host machine or operating system, the hypervisor sorts the host system’s processing power and other resources to support the various virtual machines. Some experts wonder if it’s a prime target for malicious programmers to corrupt or penetrate to gain access or control of scores of virtual machines. “The probability is high that we will see exploits targeting the hypervisors,” Unisys’ Hoff said. “The possibility really depends upon how well these vendors do in securing the underlying hypervisors themselves.” Hoff said inevitably hackers will target virtual environments specifically, but vendors have done a decent job of securing hypervisors’ underlying code. “There haven’t been any attacks against the hypervisor, so all of this talk and discussion is theoretical,” Mulchandani said. “What makes it hard to attack the hypervisor is the fact that the hypervisor is actually a very small piece of code. It has few interfaces to the outside world and does not communicate or have users checking e-mail and browsing the Web on it.” But just how do you secure the hypervisor? There are applications that reduce its attack surface, and methods include embedding the hypervisor deeper within the network or limiting the number of network channels. Attacking the hypervisor may be worth the trouble for only the most sophisticated hacker. After all, if you’re going to burglarize a house, why smash through the concrete foundation when you could break open the door or a window? “A Windows machine running on your Dell box in your physical data center and a virtual machine look identical because they have an IP address,” said Mulchandani. Consequently most hackers won’t care much about the hypervisor when they can use their regular tricks to attack the machines directly. Hoff feels the same way. “Attackers are lazy. They go after the low-hanging fruit,” he said. “Why would I bother deploying virtualized rootkits when I can just essentially exploit a poorly configured server?” This takes the same amount of effort it would take to infect a system with malware once someone clicks on a link they shouldn’t. Hypervisor Server SOURCE: VMWARE Security and Management Suppose you’re an IT manager who wants to see what happens in a section of your network. Virtual machine No. 20 is communicating with virtual machines No. 21 and No. 22, and you want to see what packets — formatted data blocks — are being exchanged. The solution is to find an application that lets you monitor traffic and provides the visibility you need. “There are a couple of folks, and VMware’s one of them, that have built net flow interfaces, which give you the ability to view what traffic is moving between all the different virtual machines within a specific hardware enclosure,” said Mike Rothman, president and principal analyst of Security Incite, an independent information security firm. Other vendors, including Microsoft, Blue Lane Technologies and Altor Networks, also have applications designed to monitor virtual traffic. These applications let people block, stop or analyze traffic. However, with so many vendors selling security-monitoring products, it’s not easy to pin down an industry leader or select a solution. “Right now, no one vendor can solve all the virtualization issues on [the] security side,” said Stefan Nguyen, a consultant for the Florida Department of Transportation who works on servers that support the central department office. Though these vendors’ software solutions all promise to monitor security, they don’t all do it the same way. “Each piece of software plays a [certain] role, so you can’t combine everybody. That’s why you have to use your own best practices.” AUG_08 Best practices are helpful, but sometimes customers are so in love with virtualization’s benefits — cost savings and energy reduction — that best practices become afterthoughts. “There [are] a lot of industry guidelines and platform providers’ suggestions, best practices, for securing virtualized environments,” said Christopher Hoff, chief security architect at Unisys. “It’s amazing how many people don’t do them.” Managing virtual networks is similar to managing physical ones. In fact, a good first step to securing a virtual infrastructure is securing the software that runs it. A properly configured physical network lays the foundation for a safe, properly configured virtualized one. “I don’t differentiate between my virtual and physical infrastructure,” said Ramsey, who recently received certified chief information officer accreditation though the University of Florida. In Charlotte County, Fla., he has eight physical servers that run 109 virtual machines. “You apply all the same methodologies and checks and balances that you would whether you’re dealing with a virtualized server or a physical server,” he said. As a beginning point, Mulchandani recommends securing the software that runs the virtualization platform. “When you move your machine from a physical machine — say you run on a Windows server or a desktop — and you [create] a virtual machine out of it, the security products and security of your machine are unchanged,” Mulchandani explained. “Meaning, if you were running antivirus software on your physical machine, it actually continues to run unchanged in your virtual machine.” 52 http://www.govtech.com
Table of Contents Feed for the Digital Edition of Government Technology - August 2008 Government Technology - August 2008 Contents Point of View The Last Mile Big Picture On the Scene Four Questions for... Net Gains A Government Technology® Industry Profile: CA CA Contents IT Network Management: State and Local Governments Face New Challenges MyFloridaNet Arkansas Department of Information Systems Hartsfield-Jackson Atlanta International Airport Government Tightens Its Belt Rocking the Vote High-Speed Portal Project On Track Wi-Fi on a Shoestring From Paintball to Video Virtually Vulnerable How It Works Products signal:noise Government Technology - August 2008 Government Technology - August 2008 - (Page Bellyband1) Government Technology - August 2008 - (Page Bellyband2) Government Technology - August 2008 - Government Technology - August 2008 (Page 1) Government Technology - August 2008 - Government Technology - August 2008 (Page 2) Government Technology - August 2008 - Contents (Page 3) Government Technology - August 2008 - Contents (Page 4) Government Technology - August 2008 - Contents (Page 5) Government Technology - August 2008 - Point of View (Page 6) Government Technology - August 2008 - Point of View (Page 7) Government Technology - August 2008 - The Last Mile (Page 8) Government Technology - August 2008 - The Last Mile (Page 9) Government Technology - August 2008 - Big Picture (Page 10) Government Technology - August 2008 - Big Picture (Page 11) Government Technology - August 2008 - On the Scene (Page 12) Government Technology - August 2008 - On the Scene (Page 13) Government Technology - August 2008 - Four Questions for... (Page 14) Government Technology - August 2008 - Four Questions for... (Page 15) Government Technology - August 2008 - Net Gains (Page 16) Government Technology - August 2008 - Net Gains (Page 17) Government Technology - August 2008 - Net Gains (Page 18) Government Technology - August 2008 - CA Contents (Page CA-1) Government Technology - August 2008 - IT Network Management: State and Local Governments Face New Challenges (Page CA-2) Government Technology - August 2008 - MyFloridaNet (Page CA-3) Government Technology - August 2008 - MyFloridaNet (Page CA-4) Government Technology - August 2008 - Arkansas Department of Information Systems (Page CA-5) Government Technology - August 2008 - Arkansas Department of Information Systems (Page CA-6) Government Technology - August 2008 - Hartsfield-Jackson Atlanta International Airport (Page CA-7) Government Technology - August 2008 - Hartsfield-Jackson Atlanta International Airport (Page CA-8) Government Technology - August 2008 - Hartsfield-Jackson Atlanta International Airport (Page 19) Government Technology - August 2008 - Hartsfield-Jackson Atlanta International Airport (Page 20) Government Technology - August 2008 - Hartsfield-Jackson Atlanta International Airport (Page 21) Government Technology - August 2008 - Hartsfield-Jackson Atlanta International Airport (Page 22) Government Technology - August 2008 - Hartsfield-Jackson Atlanta International Airport (Page 23) Government Technology - August 2008 - Government Tightens Its Belt (Page 24) Government Technology - August 2008 - Government Tightens Its Belt (Page 25) Government Technology - August 2008 - Government Tightens Its Belt (Page 26) Government Technology - August 2008 - Government Tightens Its Belt (Page 27) Government Technology - August 2008 - Government Tightens Its Belt (Page 28) Government Technology - August 2008 - Government Tightens Its Belt (Page 29) Government Technology - August 2008 - Government Tightens Its Belt (Page 30) Government Technology - August 2008 - Government Tightens Its Belt (Page 31) Government Technology - August 2008 - Rocking the Vote (Page 32) Government Technology - August 2008 - Rocking the Vote (Page 33) Government Technology - August 2008 - Rocking the Vote (Page 34) Government Technology - August 2008 - Rocking the Vote (Page 35) Government Technology - August 2008 - Rocking the Vote (Page 36) Government Technology - August 2008 - Rocking the Vote (Page 37) Government Technology - August 2008 - High-Speed Portal Project (Page 38) Government Technology - August 2008 - High-Speed Portal Project (Page 39) Government Technology - August 2008 - High-Speed Portal Project (Page 40) Government Technology - August 2008 - High-Speed Portal Project (Page 41) Government Technology - August 2008 - On Track (Page 42) Government Technology - August 2008 - On Track (Page 43) Government Technology - August 2008 - Wi-Fi on a Shoestring (Page 44) Government Technology - August 2008 - Wi-Fi on a Shoestring (Page 45) Government Technology - August 2008 - From Paintball to Video (Page 46) Government Technology - August 2008 - From Paintball to Video (Page 47) Government Technology - August 2008 - From Paintball to Video (Page 48) Government Technology - August 2008 - From Paintball to Video (Page 49) Government Technology - August 2008 - Virtually Vulnerable (Page 50) Government Technology - August 2008 - Virtually Vulnerable (Page 51) Government Technology - August 2008 - Virtually Vulnerable (Page 52) Government Technology - August 2008 - Virtually Vulnerable (Page 53) Government Technology - August 2008 - How It Works (Page 54) Government Technology - August 2008 - How It Works (Page 55) Government Technology - August 2008 - Products (Page 56) Government Technology - August 2008 - Products (Page 57) Government Technology - August 2008 - signal:noise (Page 58) Government Technology - August 2008 - signal:noise (Page 59) Government Technology - August 2008 - signal:noise (Page 60)
For optimal viewing of this digital publication, please enable JavaScript and then refresh the page. If you would like to try to load the digital publication without using Flash Player detection, please click here.