Government Technology - August 2008 - (Page 58)

signal: noise BY PAU L W. TAYLOR CHIEF STRATEGY OFFICER CENTER FOR DIGITAL GOVERNMENT index j Jurisdictions/Agencies: California Secretary of State 32 Charlotte County, Fla 50 City of Kingston Police Department, N.Y 46 Commonwealth Heath Connector Authority 38 European Organization for Nuclear Research 54 European Space Agency 11 Florida Department of Transportation 50 Florida State Attorney’s Office 42 Sacramento, Calif. 12 San Francisco, Calif 12 Toronto 12 U.S. Health and Human Services Department 12 Virginia Information Technologies Agency 24 Funding Schemes (In the nicest sense of the word.) e’ve gone off in the tall grass,” insisted Ian LiddellGrainger, visiting conservative British parliamentarian, on the UK’s government modernization. His complaints were familiar to an American audience — projects were overdue, over budget and never worked as well as the old systems they replaced. It was a “disaster,” he said. A comparative report on tax filing systems in the UK and United States brought Grainger to San Francisco, Washington, D.C., and Ottawa, Canada. He’s chair of the UK’s AllParty Parliamentary Tax Group that released the report after two years of study. But during a conversation it was clear that Grainger’s concerns extended beyond taxes to a chronic inability to realize public value from a continuous stream of treasury-robbing IT projects. “What’s worse,” he said, “we have been paying for them through off-budget schemes.” Now the phrase “off-budget scheme” sounds harsher to Americans because in the British vernacular, schemes often are good things. But not so for going off budget, protested Grainger, because the British experience with off-budget funding has been characterized by “an utter lack of accountability for how much money is involved and who gets it.” I’m the author of a white paper, Be IT Resolved, (free download at www.govtech .com) on what our guest called off-budget schemes, so I decided to press a little further into the tall grass. It turns out that was a good thing. On Grainger’s central concern — accountability — the U.S. separation of powers provides structural advantages that are largely absent in the UK. Moreover, states and localities have W quietly and effectively developed a track record of what policymakers have called “alternative funding mechanisms” — though “alternative” may be as misleading as “schemes” in describing them. Strategies like gain sharing and self-funding speak for themselves in terms of how many jurisdictions use them, how much they’ve used them and the amount of public value produced. Of course, these schemes have an important element of self-correction — no taxpayer funds are risked, and IT integrators only get paid if the systems work and increase public revenue. Our commute-length, cross-cultural conversation was instructive. The word “scheme” is regarded as benign in the UK, but pejorative in the U.S. The reverse is true where “off budget” is concerned. The phrase raises the hackles of British parliamentarians because of a dismal track record as used by Her Majesty’s government and a suspicion that its proponents have something to hide. Going off budget carries some baggage in America too, but it can be used to exploit IT’s unique ability to help pay for itself if properly conceived, executed and audited. As such, it can and has provided much needed fiscal relief for political subdivisions when revenues tank. To be clear, reducing pressure on the general fund isn’t the same as sneaking around it. Finding ways to fund modernization in tough budgetary times is consistent with the finest tradition of another Englishman. During vexing fiscal times a century ago, Lord Ernest Rutherford said, “We have no money, so we must think.” In thinking about the current tough times, it’s fair to conclude the tall grass sometimes hides the unknown and untried. Vendors: Adesso 56 AgfaPhoto 56 Altor Networks 50 BlogSpot 16 Blue Lane Technologies 50 Computer Sciences Corp. 38 Digg 16 Facebook 16 Flickr 16 Garmin 56 InnerWireless 42 LinkedIn 16 Microsoft 50 MySpace 16 Northrop Grumman 12, 24 Samsung 56 Sprout 16 Utterz 16 Vignette Corp. 38 Vmware 50 YouTube 16 Advertisers Index CDW-G 30-31 CGI 27 Diskeeper 59 ESRI 13 GovConnection 51 Hewlett-Packard PSG 60 Hewlett-Packard TSG Blades 9 Hewlett-Packard TSG Low End 23 IBM 2 Motorola 48 Northrop Grumman 41 Panasonic Toughbook 15 SAP 35 TCPN 21 TESSCO 53 U.S. General Services Administration 7 University of Maryland University College 37 Verizon Wireless 5 AUG_08 58 http://www.govtech.com http://www.govtech.com http://www.govtech.com

Table of Contents Feed for the Digital Edition of Government Technology - August 2008

Government Technology - August 2008 Contents Point of View The Last Mile Big Picture On the Scene Four Questions for... Net Gains A Government Technology® Industry Profile: CA CA Contents IT Network Management: State and Local Governments Face New Challenges MyFloridaNet Arkansas Department of Information Systems Hartsfield-Jackson Atlanta International Airport Government Tightens Its Belt Rocking the Vote High-Speed Portal Project On Track Wi-Fi on a Shoestring From Paintball to Video Virtually Vulnerable How It Works Products signal:noise

Government Technology - August 2008

For optimal viewing of this digital publication, please enable JavaScript and then refresh the page. If you would like to try to load the digital publication without using Flash Player detection, please click here.