Government Technology - October 2008 - (Page 28)

funding on the cheap: It’s collaborative, constantly updated and most important — free of charge. Or is it? Bryant said the notion is fading that open source means free. “IT professionals have become pretty sophisticated about understanding the free [concept], and open source software has to do with flexibility from traditional licensing constraints, but not cost-free,” Bryant said. “Everything — every procurement process, every acquisition, every implementation — has some kind of cost associated with it, whether it is proprietary or free. So there are opportunities to use this kind of software, and I think that increasingly you’re seeing agencies going into this with their eyes open.” That’s because though most open source software doesn’t have a licensing fee associated with it, costs accrue over time related to staff training, support and maintenance. Bryant said the documentation included with some open source software is inadequate for users, which inevitably tacks on unforeseen costs to the customer. “No software is free,” said Mark Driver, a Gartner research vice president and open source analyst. “The complexity and scale to which you are using the software for missioncritical solutions is going to, at some point, challenge that government do business less expensively. “Theoretically government is well organized and unique in that there is not a tremendous focus on intellectual property. You don’t worry about an agency being competitive with another agency, for example. The enterprise itself is owned by the citizens anyway. So the ability to share code is very high.” Driver said one way to move toward the $5,000 target would be to practice “community sourcing,” which is a relatively new term that refers to collaborative work — in the case of state and local government, Driver applies it to similar agencies that have partnered on new software projects. If you find enough partners, the total acquisition cost could significantly lower the cost barrier to the point that software acquisition could conceivably cost less than a preset amount that kicks in a legislatively mandated procurement process. Voilà! Your agency would be more agile and bypass the bureaucratic procurement channels. Of course, it’s not nearly that simple. PHOTO COURTESY OF WIKIPEDIA Chris Anderson, editor-in-chief of Wired magazine, is working on a new book called Free in which he expounds upon his belief that a “gift economy” is emerging that falls outside the bounds of what we think of as traditional capitalism. Anderson has said publicly that he believes all digital services, such as software and storage, must eventually become free. “I would certainly ask myself for every single piece of software in every category that I was acquiring and managing, ‘Is there a suitable open source solution in this space?” Mark Driver, vice president of research and open source analyst, Gartner require someone dedicated to the process. Even if I get the software for free, if that same agency ends up having to support the code all themselves — and having to have programs and becoming a software company, then they’re not really saving any money. So it requires a sort of critical mass, and that really hasn’t happened yet.” In simpler language, Bryant said open source is almost free on the front end, but will end up costing money later on. The $5,000 Question OCT_08 “So the big picture here is one of an academic, theoretical possibility versus execution,” Driver said when posed Anderson’s The concept of spreading the costs out among agencies within states, towns and the whole United States — or even internationally — is mostly untested. Driver said “community source” shared software would require that business processes be identical among the collaborating states or municipalities (e.g., identical driver’s license application processes in Florida and Oklahoma). Those sorts of obstacles could be politically untenable. “I would certainly ask myself for every single piece of software in every category that I was acquiring and managing, ‘Is there a suitable open source solution in this space?’ It’s largely measured in terms of [software’s] maturity,” Driver said. “Some spaces, when it comes to databases and applications, I would begin to look at open source as a viable technique there. Second, I would look and say, ‘Is this a custom piece of software that we need to write ourselves? If so, is there an effort out there that we can collaborate? Or would it be worth the effort in leading this process?’” Meanwhile, Bryant said she would never draw up a list of projects with a $5,000 cap in mind, but if that’s all the money she had in the budget, she would look closely at hosted solutions with minimal licensing fees, such as Google Apps — a Web-based suite of products that features a document manager, chat client, e-mail and storage, and calendar. Bryant, former deputy CIO of Oregon, said if she were in charge of IT operations for a small city with a business user that needed to do a survey, she would turn to SurveyMonkey — a popular Web site for hosting customizable survey questions. “Those kinds of things, I think, are underutilized,” Bryant said. Anderson said the corporate world is effecting a change that will likely trickle down to government. “Increasingly as we’re moving to more and more Web 2.0 technologies, more hosted stuff, more open source software — very light development tools — these things cost nothing,” he said during a keynote speech at the Conference on California’s Future. In Anderson’s worldview, it’s culturally difficult, but possible, to shift away from return-oninvestment memos to a just-go-for-it attitude. “There aren’t financial risks anymore,” he explained. That’s true, at least upfront, according to open source experts Bryant and Driver. 28 http://www.govtech.com

Table of Contents Feed for the Digital Edition of Government Technology - October 2008

Government Technology - October 2008 Contents Point of View On the Scene Big Picture Four Questions for... Letters Cover Stories: Border Crossing The Australian E-Connection Easy Rider Northern Exposure Technology on the Cheap Ditching the Desktop Heightening the Experience Pipe Dream Falling Between the Cracks Come Together, Right Now... It's a ... Car? Digital State of the Art Spectrum Products Two Cents signal:noise

Government Technology - October 2008

For optimal viewing of this digital publication, please enable JavaScript and then refresh the page. If you would like to try to load the digital publication without using Flash Player detection, please click here.