Government Technology - November 2007 - (Page 35) established service level,” Lithgo said. And the principle of adhering to specification applies not just to troubleshooting, but also to a whole range of service categories, such as configuring systems, introducing changes in technology and installing new releases. “The point is to make IT more responsive to the business and more in line with the business needs.” A Natural Fit Lithgo learned about ITIL in early 2004 at a conference in Washington, D.C., sponsored by the IT Services Management Forum. At the time, he was chief operating officer of ITS, which was planning to procure a tool to help refine its incident management and change management processes. Since those are two areas that ITIL addresses, “It was a natural fit,” he said. That same year, Willis became the state’s deputy CIO. He arrived with recent ITIL experience. As vice president of global IT for the UKbased communications company Cable and Wireless, he had sponsored a large ITIL project that covered 14 countries. “So we were immediate allies,” said Lithgo, who heads the state’s ITIL initiative. configuration management, plus some upgrades to help desk policies and procedures. Phase three, covering capacity management, availability management and some upgrades based on the latest release of ITIL, will start early next year. To illustrate how these processes work, Lithgo described the set that covers incident management. Those processes assign priorities to different kinds of service interruptions, spell out who must respond to each kind and specify With phase one complete, ITS already has gained significant benefits from ITIL. “Overall agency productivity improved 20 percent. Service desk productivity improved 30 percent with no increase in staff,” Lithgo said. Thanks to this rise in efficiency, the state is saving money. The average cost to resolve an incident dropped from $1,300 to $750, Willis said. “That’s $1.4 million a year in lower resources to resolve incidents, because we’re doing it faster, cleaner, with less confusion.” “Sometimes it takes training, or there may be months when you have some metrics that don’t look so good, or some meetings that can be uncomfortable.” Joe Lithgo, director, operational excellence program, North Carolina Office of Information Technology Services ITIL’s Impact • twenty percent increase in overall efficiency; • thirty percent increase in service desk productivity; • cost of resolving an IT problem dropped from $1,300 to $750; and • ninety-nine percent of system changes completed on time. In late 2004, ITS established a formal ITIL program. It issued RFPs for training and implementation services, and started to benchmark its service activities. In 2005, ITS started training staff in the fundamentals of ITIL, formed a steering committee and created an advisory group, which included CIOs of various state agencies. The project focuses on three phases of process design. North Carolina completed phase one in 2006, using the ITIL framework to design processes for managing incidents, problems, changes and service levels. (For definitions of ITIL processes and related terms, see www. best-management-practice.com/gemimage/ ITIL_Glossary_May_v2_2007.doc). how fast they must respond. Also, under the new regime, the service desk monitors incidents to make sure response teams meet the standards. “We’re putting out reports twice a day for any incidents that we’re in danger of breaching,” Lithgo said. “The service owners get copies of that report, and they get escalated internally before we breach them.” Each month, a team examines a report on any service breaches that slipped through the safety net, to see if they indicate a trend. If they do, the team tries to figure out the root cause. One key to the project’s success so far has been that each process design team includes people who actually use the processes, Lithgo said. “This wasn’t a couple of managers going off in a corner, designing it and saying, ‘Thou shalt do it this way.’” Another key was that leaders in the operating divisions assigned their best talent to the project, he said. Disrupting Comfort Zones Still, an ITIL project, like any initiative that introduces change, will spark some resistance. “You’re disrupting comfort zones. You’re changing roles in various ways,” Lithgo said. Some employees embrace the new career opportunities that an ITIL implementation presents, while others resent the disruption. “There’ll be some tense months up front,” Lithgo said. But issues get resolved as the project unfolds. “Sometimes it takes training, or there may be months when you have some metrics that don’t look so good, or some meetings that can be uncomfortable. But we move past that.” North Carolina’s IT professionals also are putting out fewer fires. In the past, only 26 percent of changes ITS made to IT systems were carried out according to a plan, Willis said. The rest were emergency changes made at the last minute. As of July, ITS was planning 76 percent of its system changes in advance. As a result, it made 99 percent of those changes successfully the first time around, compared to 49 percent before the ITIL implementation. In addition, technicians are resolving incidents faster. “If you’d looked a year ago, you’d have seen 200 to 300 tickets open more than seven days,” Willis said. But a recent report found only 11 trouble tickets open one week after the initial complaint. “Things aren’t falling through the cracks as much,” he said. North Carolina still has a way to go in sharpening its service performance, Willis said. Using the metrics it has developed with help from ITIL, the organization continually benchmarks itself against its peers to find specific areas it needs to improve. Having this data available makes a big difference. “Instead of managing by organizational line and turf, you’re managing by numbers. You’re going from unmeasured — and to some significant extent, therefore, unmanaged — to measured and managed,” Willis said. “In a consolidation, or in a large organization with delivery goals that change, all of those things are great. They make for very productive discussions.” CONTRIBUTING WRITER MERRILL DOUGLAS IS BASED IN UPSTATE NEW YORK. SHE SPECIALIZES IN APPLICATIONS OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY. Phase two, scheduled to wind up at the end of this year, covers release management and 35 http://www.best-management-practice.com/gemimage/ITIL_Glossary_May_2007.doc http://www.best-management-practice.com/gemimage/ITIL_Glossary_May_2007.doc http://www.best-management-practice.com/gemimage/ITIL_Glossary_May_2007.doc http://www.govtech.com
Table of Contents Feed for the Digital Edition of Government Technology - November 2007 Government Technology - November 2007 Contents Point of View Way Back Machine The Last Mile GT Spectrum Big Picture Building Better Government Up Close Inspector Gadget By the Numbers Money Talking No Greenwashing Pinching Pennies Bay Bridge Bustle Two Cents Products Signal: Noise Government Technology - November 2007 Government Technology - November 2007 - (Page Bellyband1) Government Technology - November 2007 - (Page Bellyband2) Government Technology - November 2007 - Government Technology - November 2007 (Page Cover1) Government Technology - November 2007 - Government Technology - November 2007 (Page Cover2) Government Technology - November 2007 - Government Technology - November 2007 (Page 3) Government Technology - November 2007 - Contents (Page 4) Government Technology - November 2007 - Contents (Page 5) Government Technology - November 2007 - Contents (Page 6) Government Technology - November 2007 - Contents (Page 7) Government Technology - November 2007 - Point of View (Page 8) Government Technology - November 2007 - Point of View (Page 9) Government Technology - November 2007 - Way Back Machine (Page 10) Government Technology - November 2007 - Way Back Machine (Page Alcatel1) Government Technology - November 2007 - Way Back Machine (Page Alcatel2) Government Technology - November 2007 - Way Back Machine (Page 11) Government Technology - November 2007 - The Last Mile (Page 12) Government Technology - November 2007 - The Last Mile (Page 13) Government Technology - November 2007 - GT Spectrum (Page 14) Government Technology - November 2007 - GT Spectrum (Page 15) Government Technology - November 2007 - Big Picture (Page 16) Government Technology - November 2007 - Big Picture (Page 17) Government Technology - November 2007 - Building Better Government (Page 18) Government Technology - November 2007 - Building Better Government (Page Symantec1) Government Technology - November 2007 - Building Better Government (Page Symantec2) Government Technology - November 2007 - Building Better Government (Page Symantec3) Government Technology - November 2007 - Building Better Government (Page Symantec4) Government Technology - November 2007 - Building Better Government (Page 19) Government Technology - November 2007 - Building Better Government (Page 20) Government Technology - November 2007 - Building Better Government (Page 21) Government Technology - November 2007 - Building Better Government (Page 22) Government Technology - November 2007 - Building Better Government (Page 23) Government Technology - November 2007 - Building Better Government (Page 24) Government Technology - November 2007 - Building Better Government (Page 25) Government Technology - November 2007 - Building Better Government (Page 26) Government Technology - November 2007 - Building Better Government (Page 27) Government Technology - November 2007 - Up Close (Page 28) Government Technology - November 2007 - Up Close (Page 29) Government Technology - November 2007 - Inspector Gadget (Page 30) Government Technology - November 2007 - Inspector Gadget (Page 31) Government Technology - November 2007 - Inspector Gadget (Page 32) Government Technology - November 2007 - Inspector Gadget (Page 33) Government Technology - November 2007 - By the Numbers (Page 34) Government Technology - November 2007 - By the Numbers (Page Sprint1) Government Technology - November 2007 - By the Numbers (Page Sprint2) Government Technology - November 2007 - By the Numbers (Page 35) Government Technology - November 2007 - By the Numbers (Page 36) Government Technology - November 2007 - By the Numbers (Page 37) Government Technology - November 2007 - Money Talking (Page 38) Government Technology - November 2007 - Money Talking (Page 39) Government Technology - November 2007 - No Greenwashing (Page 40) Government Technology - November 2007 - No Greenwashing (Page 41) Government Technology - November 2007 - Pinching Pennies (Page 42) Government Technology - November 2007 - Pinching Pennies (Page 43) Government Technology - November 2007 - Bay Bridge Bustle (Page 44) Government Technology - November 2007 - Bay Bridge Bustle (Page 45) Government Technology - November 2007 - Bay Bridge Bustle (Page 46) Government Technology - November 2007 - Bay Bridge Bustle (Page 47) Government Technology - November 2007 - Two Cents (Page 48) Government Technology - November 2007 - Products (Page 49) Government Technology - November 2007 - Signal: Noise (Page 50) Government Technology - November 2007 - Signal: Noise (Page Cover3) Government Technology - November 2007 - Signal: Noise (Page Cover4)
For optimal viewing of this digital publication, please enable JavaScript and then refresh the page. If you would like to try to load the digital publication without using Flash Player detection, please click here.