Hispanic Enterprise - December 2007/January 2008 - (Page 52) POLITICS & GOVERNMENT PARTISAN POLITICS HAVE NO PLACE IN THE DISCUSSION OF THE NO CHILD LEFT BEHIND EDUCATION REFORM. By Ruben Navarrette, Jr. BACK TO BASICS spend their time protecting those who already have a slice. No one pays a higher price for that than Hispanics, the nation’s largest minority group but also—by many accounts—the most poorly educated one. It’s bad enough that Democrats oppose school choice and vouchers that would allow Hispanic parents to take their kids out of failing schools, oppose merit pay for teachers and higher standards for students, resist reforming bilingual education and oppose anything that makes the system more demanding. They put the interests of teachers above those of students. But what is really troubling is that Democrats—including those in Congress and even some running for president—have tapped into those instincts in declaring war on No Child Left Behind, perhaps the most important educational reform law in the last half century and certainly the most controversial. Not that it should be controversial. The law is cut and dried, and it doesn’t ask much. Proposed by the Bush Administration and passed by Congress in f you listen to the liberal English-language media or the ultra-liberal Spanish-language media, you might get the idea that Democrats are the white hats protecting Hispanics from those evil Republicans, who made a mess of the debate over immigration. But that’s just one issue. Personally, I wonder who is going to protect Hispanics from Democrats and the evil that they do when it comes to stifling education reform. CEOs and other leaders in the business community complain that there aren’t enough qualified workers to fill jobs so U.S. companies have to look aboard for a more-skilled labor force. Democrats aren’t doing much to respond to those concerns. In fact, with their protectionist rhetoric and hostility toward trade, many of them seem more interested in helping U.S. workers—and the labor unions that represent them—hold on to what they have rather than ensuring that more people have the educational opportunities to help them succeed. Instead of growing the pie, they 52 I 2002, it requires that all students perform at grade level in reading and math by 2014 and relies on regular tests to gauge how well students—and by implication, teachers and administrators—are doing toward reaching that goal. It also separates data by racial and ethnic subgroups to get a sense for which students are in the greatest distress. Lastly, it empowers limited English-proficient students by preventing schools from testing them in their native language (usually Spanish) in perpetuity so we can find out how much progress they’re making. Yet, to listen to Democrats, No Child Left Behind is more the problem than the solution. That view was on display during a recent presidential debate in Iowa. Sen. Christopher Dodd (D-CT) said that Americans “need a far better approach” on the law. Sen. Barack Obama (D-IL) agreed and said Congress ”shouldn’t reauthorize [the law] without changing it fundamentally.” Sen. Hillary Clinton (D-NY) insisted that the law be brought more in line with the reality of teaching. And New Mexico Gov. Bill Richardson called the law “a mess” and “a disaster” December/January 2008 HISPANIC ENTERPRISE
For optimal viewing of this digital publication, please enable JavaScript and then refresh the page. If you would like to try to load the digital publication without using Flash Player detection, please click here.