EP Lab Digest - March 2008 - (Page 28)

28 EP TECHNOLOGY MARCH 2008 Are MRI-Safe Pacemakers and Leads on the Horizon? Q & A with J. Rod Gimbel, MD J. Rod GImbel, MD. becoming increasingly important in the diagnosis and management of cardiac disease. Estimates vary, but it’s felt that approximately 200,000 pacemaker patients are denied MRI annually. Tell us about the trial and study design. How many patients will be involved in the trial? How many sites will be involved? The EnRhythm MRI trial is a prospective, randomized, controlled, unblinded, multi-center study involving up to 470 individuals at sites in the United States, Canada, Europe, Middle East, Africa, and potentially Japan. Eligibility is based on the traditional indications for a pacemaker and a willingness to undergo elective MRI scanning. All patients in the trial will receive an EnRhythm MRI SureScan pacing system (pulse generator and leads), and twothirds of the participants will receive MRI scans; the trial’s first MRI scans will occur approximately two to three months after device implant.The control group is also particularly important in this study. The study will compare the electrical system performance among patients in both groups. In addition, the study will assess any MRI-related complication rates in the month following the MRI scans. Interview by Jodie Elrod I n this interview with J. Rod Gimbel, MD, he provides information about the EnRhythm MRI trial, which is studying the safety and efficacy of a pacemaker and lead system designed for MRI-conditional use. Dr. Gimbel is located at East Tennessee Heart Consultants and is an investigator in the trial. How does this pacemaker differ from currently available pacemakers? It’s important to understand that the EnRhythm MRI SureScan pacing system includes both important modifications to both the pulse generator and leads. The system works together to minimize the risk of MRI exposure. While the EnRhythm MRI SureScan pulse generator has all the advanced features of Medtronic’s present EnRhythm pacemaker, including MVP (managed ventricular pacing), the EnRhythm MRI SureScan pacing system includes modified hardware to minimize the level of energy transmitted through the lead/device connection point. The pacemaker also includes a new SureScan feature that can be programmed on before an MRI scan to eliminate the impact of MRI-generated electrical noise, which can alter pacing therapy. To help identify the device, the pacemaker and leads also contain radiopaque marks, viewable via X-ray, to indicate that the system is MR-Conditional (a term identifying a device that may be used during an MRI under specified scanning conditions). The CapSureFix MRI SureScan pacing leads are modified versions of the active-fixation Medtronic CapSureFix® Novus leads, and are designed to decrease the risk of overheating during an MRI scan without limiting the ability to pace or sense the heart. What are the risks of having cardiac devices in MRIs? Why is it important to have MRI-safe implantable devices for patients? The risks are many, varied, and complex. Because of electromagnetic interference, MRI scanners may cause traditional pacemakers to pace or inhibit in an unreliable fashion. Additionally, the pacing lead can act as an antennae — picking up the energy from the MRI and dissipating the energy as heat at the tissue interfaces.This can lead to deterioration of sensing and capture. Approximately 1.5 million Americans have cardiac pacemakers, and none of these patients have devices that have FDA labeling suggesting they can undergo an MRI procedure. This leaves the clinician in a difficult situation should an MRI be requested. Obviously, MRI is a powerful tool and it’s frequently ordered. MRI is also Tell us about the Medtronic EnRhythm MRI SureScan pacing system. How does it work? The EnRhythm MRI SureScan pacing system consists of the dual-chamber EnRhythm MRI™ SureScan™ pacemaker and CapSureFix MRI™ SureScan™ pacing leads. It is designed for safe use under specified scanning conditions in MRI machines with a magnetic field strength of 1.5 tesla (T). A tesla is the unit used to describe the strength of a magnetic field. A typical magnet that we place over a pacemaker or ICD is about 10 Gauss. One tesla is 10,000 Gauss. Along with the strong static magnetic field in the MRI, there is also a powerful gradient magnetic field and radiofrequency field being applied. The MRI presents a hardy challenge to the pacing system in terms of electromagnetic interference. Because of all the electromagnetic interference in the MRI suite, traditional pacemakers may misinterpret MRI-generated electrical noise and withhold pacing therapy or deliver unnecessary pacing therapy. Therefore, this investigational system includes a new feature that Medtronic calls “SureScan.” When programmed on before an MRI scan, this temporarily alters the device’s data collection and monitoring functions, while still providing pacing if needed. When are the start and completion dates of the trial? The trial began in Europe in February 2007; in Canada in June 2007; and in the United States in January 2008.The expected study duration and follow-up time is approximately 30 months, following which the FDA will review all relevant clinical and non-clinical data in order to determine whether or not the EnRhythm MRI system is safe and effective and should be allowed to be marketed. See ENRHYTHM MRI page 31 Because of the increasing role of MRI in the future, physicians will likely push for devices that are MRIcompatible; it’s simply one less thing to worry about in an already hectic, risk-filled day of managing patients.

Table of Contents Feed for the Digital Edition of EP Lab Digest - March 2008

EP Lab Digest - March 2008 ECG 101: The Case of a Dizzy Patient with a Left Bundle Branch Block Delayed Defibrillation: Research and Results Interview with Paul S. Chan, MD Contents Letter from the Editor Spotlight Interview: St. Joseph’s Hospital Health Center Parent Heart Watch from 36,000 Feet… Perspectives from the Annual Leadership Conference Clinical Trial Overview: 2008 Are MRI-Safe Pacemakers and Leads on the Horizon? Q & A with J. Rod Gimbel, MD Navigating Tortuous Coronary Sinus Anatomy Using a Bipolar Lead Email Discussion Group: March 2008 Guidelines on ECG Interpretation Spotlight Interview Update: What Have We Learned? The Value of Educating Staff Events Calendar Industry News and Products Classifieds Advertisers Index In Memoriam

EP Lab Digest - March 2008

For optimal viewing of this digital publication, please enable JavaScript and then refresh the page. If you would like to try to load the digital publication without using Flash Player detection, please click here.