Today's Wound Clinic - Winter 2008 - (Page 30) inperspective regard to venous ulceration, guidelines are focused on the provision of appropriate compression. Margolis1,2 reported that appropriate limb compression resulted in healing rates of 30% to 60% at 24 weeks and 70% to 85% at 1 year. In a 2006 study of wound healing trajectories in 232 patients conducted in eight trials over 10 years, Steed3 showed that 60% of patients were healed on average at 20 weeks. Thus, when appropriate compression is applied, the overall healing rate in venous ulcers approaches 80% and has remained unchanged for the past 20 years. Bringing Wound Care Back to the Future A 20-YEAR PERSPECTIVE ON VENOUS ULCER MANAGEMENT CAROLINE FIFE, MD When so much has changed in the wound care industry between the years 1990 and 2006, how could so little have changed in terms of outcomes for stasis patients? THE FRUSTRATING 15% In the 1990s, product choice was relatively limited and the standard of care at the time was the “Duke Boot,” popularized by Dr. Claude Burton of Duke University.4 In 1993, this author reviewed data from 300 consecutive patients treated at Memorial Hermann Hospital, Houston, Tex using Dr. Burton’s approach that comprised use of a hydrocolloid dressing and an Unna’s boot (we used Gelocast™ Unna's Boot Dressing (Biersdorf Jobst, Inc., Charlotte, NC) covered with an elastic wrap (ACE® T 30 he majority of patients afflicted with chronic wounds suffer from lower extremity ulcers caused by chronic venous insufficiency (CVI) that affects approximately 2.5 million people in the US. It has been estimated that approximately 600,000 people seek treatment for venous leg ulcers on Winter 2008 Today’s Wound Clinic an annual basis and given the relationship between age and venous ulceration that number most likely will continue to grow as the population ages. Tremendous effort has been expended by many organizations to define the standard of care for venous ulcerations. Data show that following guidelines improves patient outcomes. With
For optimal viewing of this digital publication, please enable JavaScript and then refresh the page. If you would like to try to load the digital publication without using Flash Player detection, please click here.