Institutional Investor's Alpha Magazine - June 2008 - (Page 70)

VID SWENSEN ALPHA HALL OF FAME DA “I’ve always had a willingness to take a position that is fundamentally different from the rest of the world and maintain it. I don’t mean that in the sense of investing in a single security; it’s the ability to pursue an intellectual strategy and stick with it. For example, when I arrived at Yale, I increased the equity orientation and diversiﬁcation of the portfolio. The equity orientation obviously drove the results, but the diversiﬁcation put us in a position where we were able to generate positive returns year in and year out. We did have one negative year, in the ﬁ scal year that included October 1987, but you could put an asterisk by that because we were only two years into moving toward an equityoriented, diversiﬁed model, and the negative return was less than 1 percent. In the late 1980s we hired a number of managers who were indifferent to the markets in the sense that they were trying to make money regardless of the direction of the S&P 500 index. One of my investment committee members, Parker Gilbert, who used to run Morgan Stanley, said, ‘You have a lot of assets classiﬁed as domestic equities that don’t look anything like the S&P.’ It was true. If you had things classiﬁed as domestic equities that weren’t going to behave like the domestic equity market, then they were misclassiﬁed, because the idea of an asset class is that the constituent parts should respond similarly to important drivers of returns. If you have managers pursuing strategies designed to be fundamentally uncorrelated with a particular asset class, they should be classiﬁed elsewhere. Not having any other sensible home for these non-S&P-like strategies, we decided that we would create an asset class and call it ‘absolute return.’ Several years after we started using the term at Yale, I remember some ﬁ nancial institution sent us a pitch book titled ‘Absolute Return: What Is It, and How Does It Work?’ I thought, Hey, somebody is using our term! I had no idea it would become such a phenomenon. Nowadays a lot of market participants are seduced by the returns reported for the hedge fund industry by consultants, but the image is a lot more attractive than the reality. The consultants’ numbers are substantially inﬂ ated by survivorship bias. When managers exit for bad performance, their records disappear. Prospective investors tend to look at historical performance for the industry and assume that they can get low-double-digit rates of return and substantial diversiﬁcation, but when they invest, they discover that they can get only low- to mid-single-digit rates of return with some diversiﬁcation, which is not nearly as attractive. At Yale the most important shift in vetting hedge fund managers over the past 15 or 20 years has been an increasing focus on the character and quality of the investment principals. Years ago, I would have talked about this investment characteristic or that objective factor. Now we focus overwhelmingly on assessing the managers running the business. The fundamental question is, Are these people you want to be partners with? I think it really comes down to individual characteristics.” — Interview by Loch Adamson “The most important shift in vetting hedge fund managers has been an increasing focus on the character DA VID and quality SWENSEN of people.” Photographed by Cedric Angeles in New Haven, Connecticut. avid Swensen won’t appear on any list of the best-paid asset managers, nor will he make headlines for collecting edgy art or hosting swank charity fundraisers. But in his early and unequivocal embrace of hedge funds, the unassuming 54-year-old chief investment ofﬁ cer of Yale University’s $22.5 billion endowment has been the trailblazer among managers of endowments, foundations and, increasingly, public and corporate pension funds. Along the way he has become one of the most inﬂ uential investors in the world. Since taking the job in 1985 at the behest of his onetime Ph.D. adviser, Nobel Prize–winning economist James Tobin, Swensen has recast Yale’s portfolio — in 1990 he set an initial allocation target of 15 percent of assets with what he dubbed “absolute return” managers (today it’s 23 percent). In the process he set a higher benchmark for the entire asset management industry. The Yale portfolio, once conservative and plodding, has delivered industry-leading annualized returns of 16.8 percent over 23 years under Swensen. 70 • INSTITUTIONAL INVESTOR’S ALPHA • JUNE 2008

Table of Contents Feed for the Digital Edition of Institutional Investor's Alpha Magazine - June 2008

Investor's Alpha Magazine - June 2008 Contents Letter From the Editor Longs & Shorts Cover Story: Alpha Hall of Fame Bruce Kovner Michael Steinhardt Kenneth Griffin Louis Bacon Steven Cohen George Soros James Simons Seth Klarman Julian Robertson Jr. Jack Nash Leon Levy Paul Tudor Jones II Alfred Winslow Jones David Swensen Looking Ahead: Back to the Future Research Center: Europe Hedge Fund 50 Unhedged: Let the Sunshine In

Institutional Investor's Alpha Magazine - June 2008

For optimal viewing of this digital publication, please enable JavaScript and then refresh the page. If you would like to try to load the digital publication without using Flash Player detection, please click here.