Counsel to Counsel - May 2008 - (Page 7) CArLTON FIELDS Minimizing Fallout Unfortunately, the theft or loss of private customer and/or employee information is becoming increasingly common. Since identity theft typically occurs within two weeks of a security breach, a company must have procedures in place to respond quickly. LOST Or STOLEN DATA: situation implementation steps Make sure IT has a disaster recovery or emergency data backup system in place. If not, implement one immediately. Should data be lost or stolen: • Have IT replicate the database to determine the type of data and the individuals involved. • Establish your notification requirements, by state where those affected reside. In the absence of such laws, determine, based upon the type of information lost or stolen, if the company might reduce liability and benefit customers by sending notification of the breach. • Send impacted individuals a notification letter with contact information for the big three credit bureaus, as well as the Social Security Administration and other applicable agencies. • Include instructions on how to establish a fraud alert, credit monitoring, credit freeze and/or identity theft insurance through one of the agencies. • Work with media relations to prepare a public statement. • Implement new steps to prevent reoccurrence and future losses. Inside counsel must develop a process that will allow the company to quickly determine the extent of the breach, fulfill notification obligations under state law and mitigate the potential harm to customers and/or employees. challenge in-house counsel Your response process must be in place long before a laptop or any other data storage device is lost or stolen, because you will need to replicate its database to determine the information lost, the individuals impacted and the potential harm that might be caused if the information is misused. Some companies do not have a disaster recovery or emergency backup system in place to re-create lost data. Contact IT to determine whether your company can re-create data in the event of disaster (e.g., fire) or theft (e.g., stolen laptop). approach adopted Once the database is replicated, perform a risk assessment. If the lost or stolen data includes names, addresses and Social Security numbers or credit card numbers or other sensitive information, determine your notification obligations. Notification laws continue to evolve and vary depending on the state in which those affected reside. For example, if the data on a stolen laptop is encrypted, most states do not require you to notify the individual. If the computer is only password protected, most states do require notification. Even if your state does not have a data breach notification law, your company may wish to notify individuals if there is a significant chance of identity theft due to the type of data lost or stolen. Draft a notification letter that explains what happened and provides instructions on how to file a fraud alert, which lasts 90 days, with any one of the three credit reporting agencies. In states with credit freeze laws, instruct individuals how to file. Also provide contact information for the Social Security Administration and other organizations, as necessary. You may recommend a credit bureau’s credit monitoring service, which typically includes identity theft insurance. If feasible, offer to pick up the tab, which not only mitigates liability exposure to the individual, but your company as well. Work with media relations to prepare a public statement and press release explaining how you’ve mitigated the data loss and post it on your company Web site. Identify and correct the security weakness to prevent future losses. Having procedures in place beforehand will result in a prompt, well-executed response. That, in turn, will significantly reduce the potential damages to the impacted individuals and the potential liability to your company. measuring success future issues to consider Every new convenience computers provide brings a corresponding security-related inconvenience. Annually review new technologies and their impact on your company’s privacy/security policies. Since privacy and security law is a rapidly evolving field, regularly monitor the laws where customers are located. Phyllis F. Granade is a shareholder in Carlton Fields’ Atlanta office, where she provides compliance assistance to clients confronted with privacy and security breaches. Phyllis is Peer Review Rated and can be reached at pgranade@carltonfields.com. martindale.com/c2c May 2008 best practices 07 http://www.martindale.com/c2c
Table of Contents Feed for the Digital Edition of Counsel to Counsel - May 2008 Counsel to Counsel - May 2008 Contents Harassment Policies NEC Corporation of America and Duane Morris LLP Lost or Stolen Data: Minimizing Fallout On-Boarding the Board Drafting Fair, Efficient and Enforceable Arbitration Agreements Responding to Counterfeit Products Crafting an English-Only Workplace Policy Distressed Debt: New Players, Global Sophistication Make Restructuring More Complex IP Confidential: Plan Ahead, Act Fast to Protect Your Trade Secrets Adverse Changes: Think Ahead in a Strained M&A Market Optimizing Web 2.0 Technology: Expanding Your Professional Network Union Pacific Railroad Company and Patton Boggs LLP Warming Warning: Develop Your Climate Change Strategy Now Risk Sharing: Expect New Obstacles and Expenses in Syndicated Loans E-Discovery in Action Diversification at the Gate Energy Counsel to Counsel - May 2008 Counsel to Counsel - May 2008 - Counsel to Counsel - May 2008 (Page Cover1) Counsel to Counsel - May 2008 - Counsel to Counsel - May 2008 (Page Cover2) Counsel to Counsel - May 2008 - Contents (Page 1) Counsel to Counsel - May 2008 - Harassment Policies (Page 2) Counsel to Counsel - May 2008 - Harassment Policies (Page 3) Counsel to Counsel - May 2008 - NEC Corporation of America and Duane Morris LLP (Page 4) Counsel to Counsel - May 2008 - NEC Corporation of America and Duane Morris LLP (Page 5) Counsel to Counsel - May 2008 - NEC Corporation of America and Duane Morris LLP (Page 6) Counsel to Counsel - May 2008 - Lost or Stolen Data: Minimizing Fallout (Page 7) Counsel to Counsel - May 2008 - On-Boarding the Board (Page 8) Counsel to Counsel - May 2008 - Drafting Fair, Efficient and Enforceable Arbitration Agreements (Page 9) Counsel to Counsel - May 2008 - Responding to Counterfeit Products (Page 10) Counsel to Counsel - May 2008 - Crafting an English-Only Workplace Policy (Page 11) Counsel to Counsel - May 2008 - Distressed Debt: New Players, Global Sophistication Make Restructuring More Complex (Page 12) Counsel to Counsel - May 2008 - Distressed Debt: New Players, Global Sophistication Make Restructuring More Complex (Page 13) Counsel to Counsel - May 2008 - IP Confidential: Plan Ahead, Act Fast to Protect Your Trade Secrets (Page 14) Counsel to Counsel - May 2008 - IP Confidential: Plan Ahead, Act Fast to Protect Your Trade Secrets (Page 15) Counsel to Counsel - May 2008 - Adverse Changes: Think Ahead in a Strained M&A Market (Page 16) Counsel to Counsel - May 2008 - Adverse Changes: Think Ahead in a Strained M&A Market (Page 17) Counsel to Counsel - May 2008 - Optimizing Web 2.0 Technology: Expanding Your Professional Network (Page 18) Counsel to Counsel - May 2008 - Union Pacific Railroad Company and Patton Boggs LLP (Page 19) Counsel to Counsel - May 2008 - Union Pacific Railroad Company and Patton Boggs LLP (Page 20) Counsel to Counsel - May 2008 - Union Pacific Railroad Company and Patton Boggs LLP (Page 21) Counsel to Counsel - May 2008 - Warming Warning: Develop Your Climate Change Strategy Now (Page 22) Counsel to Counsel - May 2008 - Warming Warning: Develop Your Climate Change Strategy Now (Page 23) Counsel to Counsel - May 2008 - Risk Sharing: Expect New Obstacles and Expenses in Syndicated Loans (Page 24) Counsel to Counsel - May 2008 - Risk Sharing: Expect New Obstacles and Expenses in Syndicated Loans (Page 25) Counsel to Counsel - May 2008 - E-Discovery in Action (Page 26) Counsel to Counsel - May 2008 - E-Discovery in Action (Page 27) Counsel to Counsel - May 2008 - Diversification at the Gate (Page 28) Counsel to Counsel - May 2008 - Diversification at the Gate (Page 29) Counsel to Counsel - May 2008 - Diversification at the Gate (Page 30) Counsel to Counsel - May 2008 - Energy (Page 31) Counsel to Counsel - May 2008 - Energy (Page 32) Counsel to Counsel - May 2008 - Energy (Page Cover3) Counsel to Counsel - May 2008 - Energy (Page Cover4)
For optimal viewing of this digital publication, please enable JavaScript and then refresh the page. If you would like to try to load the digital publication without using Flash Player detection, please click here.