Chief Learning Officer - February 2008 - (Page 42)

productivity Anecdotal Evidence: Worthwhile or Worthless? Chris Moore Anecdotal assessment of learning initiatives is both necessary and valuable, and learning organizations still need to do it. You’re in a meeting with the chief executive of your organization, and you’re asked why you’ve budgeted $100,000 for a new training curriculum for the customer service team. Which of these responses are you more comfortable giving? A. “We’re getting feedback from the team that our current customer service training is not so good. My gut tells me it’s time to revamp the training and reintroduce it using some cool new technology that we want to try out.” B. “We’re getting feedback from the team that our current customer service training is outdated. The ways that reps interact with our customers have changed, and the team feels the current training doesn’t reflect the changes. Our plan is to bring the training current and, since managers think that the reps spend too much time out of the office for training already, convert it to self-paced content and put it online so reps can take it at anytime, right at their desks.” C. “The key metrics we monitor for customer service training are validating important feedback from the team. They’re telling us that the ways reps interact with our customers have changed and the training needs to reflect the new model. A steady decline in first-time call resolution supports that feedback. Managers are also concerned that reps spend too much time out of the office for training. A steady growth in case backlogs supports that theory as well. The $100,000 investment will bring the curriculum current and incorporate a blend of selfpaced and virtual instruction. Bringing those metrics back on target is expected to increase our customer satisfaction index by 10 percent. In the past, each percentagepoint increase in customer satisfaction has meant an average of $250,000 in incremental sales revenue.” I can’t say that Response A has never been given before, but it’s easy to imagine the look on the chief executive’s face, a one-sided eyebrow-raised scowl. Response B is more acceptable but still lacks any proof that the feedback is valid, thereby lacking real justification for the investment. That leaves Response C. But is it realistic that you’ve got the hard data ready to back up the feedback that’s guiding your investment decision? It is if you’re thinking metrics before the feedback ever arrives. The informal feedback loop for improving learning has been in practice for years, long before the proverbial smile sheet was developed. There was a time when it was all that the training department had to go on. Today, anecdotal assessment of learning initiatives is both necessary and valuable, and learning organizations still need to do it. February 2008 I www.clomedia.com I Chief Learning Officer 42 Chris Moore is president of Zeroed-In Technologies. He can be reached at editor@clomedia.com. http://www.clomedia.com

Table of Contents Feed for the Digital Edition of Chief Learning Officer - February 2008

Chief Learning Officer - February 2008 Editor's Letter Table of Contents Business Impact Trends Best Practices Effectiveness Guest Editorial Learning Solutions Home Depot: Building Better Associates CLO Profile Environment Realizing the Vision of “One Philips” Tactics Sun Microsystems’ Next-Generation Worker Video Game Recruiting Tool Productivity The Regence Group: Blended Measurement Human Capital NASA: A Case Study in Technical Leadership Development Case Study Business Intelligence Advertisers' Index Editorial Resources In Conclusion

Chief Learning Officer - February 2008

For optimal viewing of this digital publication, please enable JavaScript and then refresh the page. If you would like to try to load the digital publication without using Flash Player detection, please click here.