Chief Learning Officer - August 2007 - (Page 39) productivity intervals against defined target values. Quantifiable metrics come in all shapes and sizes — they could be dollars, counts, percentages and days, aggregated in terms of totals, averages, lows, highs or even standard deviations. The choice between quantifiable or qualitative might depend on the maturity of your learning and data management processes. Organizations with a mature learning infrastructure (e.g., learning management systems, evaluation and survey systems) and good data standards house a wealth of information from which to measure progress. Those organizations with lessmature and less-consistent processes are served best by qualitative measures driven through regular performance management review intervals. The underlying measures you choose for your key learning indicator inevitably will determine its type. There are three types of indicators: leading, coincident and lagging. Leading indicators are the most valuable because they are better indications of future outcomes. They actually change before the business environment changes. Learning effectiveness is an example of a leading key learning indicator, as it measures the value and impact the organization is expected to realize in terms of productivity or financial gain. Coincident indicators change at about the same time as the business environment. Compliance is a coincident indicator, as it measures the state of compliance at the current point in time. Lagging indicators change after the business environment changes. Fiscal responsibility is a lagging key learning indicator, as it is typically tied to budget, costs and spending within the learning function. Below are seven key learning indicators that chief learning officers use to measure and monitor the success of their initiatives: Operational Excellence What it means: The learning organization is operating at its optimal efficiency for its level of resources and investment. Your return on effort (ROE) is maximized. I www.clomedia.com I Chief Learning Officer 39 August 2007 How it’s measured: Average cost per student day, training expenditures as a ratio of full-time employees, enrollment and fill rates, learning process maturity level, facility costs, training revenue, staffing levels, delivery models, development timelines and expenses. An example: The learning organization is mandated to operate as a profit center and use the zero-based budgeting method. Monitoring operational excellence and its key measures provides actual baselines and projections from which to plan and analyze budgeting decision packages. Obtaining operational excellence ensures you maximize your resources in pursuit of profitability while minimizing your expenses. http://www.clomedia.com
Table of Contents Feed for the Digital Edition of Chief Learning Officer - August 2007 Chief Learning Officer - August 2007 Chief Learning Officer - August 2007 - (Page Intro) Chief Learning Officer - August 2007 - (Page Cover1) Chief Learning Officer - August 2007 - (Page Cover2) Chief Learning Officer - August 2007 - (Page 3) Chief Learning Officer - August 2007 - (Page 4) Chief Learning Officer - August 2007 - (Page 5) Chief Learning Officer - August 2007 - (Page 6) Chief Learning Officer - August 2007 - (Page 7) Chief Learning Officer - August 2007 - (Page 8) Chief Learning Officer - August 2007 - (Page 9) Chief Learning Officer - August 2007 - (Page 10) Chief Learning Officer - August 2007 - (Page 11) Chief Learning Officer - August 2007 - (Page 12) Chief Learning Officer - August 2007 - (Page 13) Chief Learning Officer - August 2007 - (Page 14) Chief Learning Officer - August 2007 - (Page 15) Chief Learning Officer - August 2007 - (Page 16) Chief Learning Officer - August 2007 - (Page 17) Chief Learning Officer - August 2007 - (Page 18) Chief Learning Officer - August 2007 - (Page 19) Chief Learning Officer - August 2007 - (Page 20) Chief Learning Officer - August 2007 - (Page 21) Chief Learning Officer - August 2007 - (Page 22) Chief Learning Officer - August 2007 - (Page 23) Chief Learning Officer - August 2007 - (Page 24) Chief Learning Officer - August 2007 - (Page 25) Chief Learning Officer - August 2007 - (Page 26) Chief Learning Officer - August 2007 - (Page 27) Chief Learning Officer - August 2007 - (Page 28) Chief Learning Officer - August 2007 - (Page 29) Chief Learning Officer - August 2007 - (Page 30) Chief Learning Officer - August 2007 - (Page 31) Chief Learning Officer - August 2007 - (Page 32) Chief Learning Officer - August 2007 - (Page 33) Chief Learning Officer - August 2007 - (Page 34) Chief Learning Officer - August 2007 - (Page 35) Chief Learning Officer - August 2007 - (Page 36) Chief Learning Officer - August 2007 - (Page 37) Chief Learning Officer - August 2007 - (Page 38) Chief Learning Officer - August 2007 - (Page 39) Chief Learning Officer - August 2007 - (Page 40) Chief Learning Officer - August 2007 - (Page 41) Chief Learning Officer - August 2007 - (Page 42) Chief Learning Officer - August 2007 - (Page 43) Chief Learning Officer - August 2007 - (Page 44) Chief Learning Officer - August 2007 - (Page 45) Chief Learning Officer - August 2007 - (Page 46) Chief Learning Officer - August 2007 - (Page 47) Chief Learning Officer - August 2007 - (Page 48) Chief Learning Officer - August 2007 - (Page 49) Chief Learning Officer - August 2007 - (Page 50) Chief Learning Officer - August 2007 - (Page 51) Chief Learning Officer - August 2007 - (Page 52) Chief Learning Officer - August 2007 - (Page 53) Chief Learning Officer - August 2007 - (Page 54) Chief Learning Officer - August 2007 - (Page Cover3) Chief Learning Officer - August 2007 - (Page Cover4)
For optimal viewing of this digital publication, please enable JavaScript and then refresh the page. If you would like to try to load the digital publication without using Flash Player detection, please click here.