Chief Learning Officer- September 2008 - (Page 40) IN PRACTICE BORROWING MEASUREMENT PRACTICES FROM INVESTORS I nvestors know the importance of a balanced portfolio to optimize return on investment. They manage portfolio effectiveness by balancing risky investments that offer high returns with safer ones with lower paybacks. Foundation Learning and development (L&D) teams can use the same principle to balance learning investments. They must consider that a certain percentage of the budget is needed to provide mandated, compliance-related training. Organizations focusing investments here are operating at a foundation level and are achieving the business equivalent of keeping the lights on. While the programs are essential, they do not push critical business objectives. L&D should consider purchasing off-the-shelf content when this training involves generic topics such as safety, diversity, regulatory compliance, and minimize, if not eliminate, time to customize these programs. The objective at this level is to invest the exact amount required to get the job done. One large gas and chemical company found that its objective to be the safest company in the industry led to an overinvestment in safety training. While it achieved the objective, it did so to the detriment of other critical areas of the business, leaving the door open for competitors to slip in and take away market share. Progressive At the next investment threshold, organizations allocate funds for programs that will help ensure the company remains competitive. These programs teach employees to use the professional tools they need to be effective in functional/technical roles and to understand and interface well with company operations. Other programs in this category include those that improve business operations, including topics such as Six Sigma and common leadership practices such as coaching for performance. Programs in this segment represent a mix between generic and industry-specific content. For example, Six Sigma is a standard methodology with training available from many sources. However, L&D teams may customize modules to supplement Six Sigma programs that would help practitioners evaluate company-specific projects to find those promising the biggest benefits. Leading Edge Companies on the leading edge allocate ample funding for L&D programs targeted at new initiatives, innovation, company growth objectives and other areas with potential to push the company ahead of competitors. Programs at this level require a significant degree of customization because they present management innovations and business trends in the context of the company’s industry and in relation to its specific challenges. This is the key area where L&D has the potential for the greatest impact but also presents the most risk. A basic portfolio management tool that analyzes investments by projected return, required funding, resources, timing and other decision criteria can significantly improve the overall impact of learning on corporate sustainability and success. CLO – Susan M. Todd FOUNDATION Minimize cost PROGRESSIVE Remain competitive LEADING EDGE Major advantage B Business strategies Executive development l Leader development Quality tools Business Utility Products and services Professional development Individual Utility Applications and tools Compliance Orientation Foundation Knowledge Business Creation LEARNING INFRASTRUCTURE 40
Table of Contents Feed for the Digital Edition of Chief Learning Officer- September 2008 Chief Learning Officer Editor’s Letter Contents Connections Imperatives Selling Up, Selling Down Strategies Take Five Lifestyle Learning: Improve the Bottom Line With Behavioral Education Tracom’s Social Style Model CLO Profile IOL: Determining the Impact of Learning Communicating With the Boss About Impact Mission Accomplished? Measuring Success of Corporate Universities Borrowing Measurement Practices From Investors Value Creation With Human Capital Investment Business Impact Analysis at Chrysler Learning or Performance Enhancement: Which Is It? Best Practices in Global Project Management Training Case Study Business Intelligence Advertisers’ Index Editorial Resources In Conclusion Chief Learning Officer- September 2008 Chief Learning Officer- September 2008 - Chief Learning Officer (Page Cover1) Chief Learning Officer- September 2008 - Chief Learning Officer (Page Cover2) Chief Learning Officer- September 2008 - Chief Learning Officer (Page 3) Chief Learning Officer- September 2008 - Editor’s Letter (Page 4) Chief Learning Officer- September 2008 - Editor’s Letter (Page 5) Chief Learning Officer- September 2008 - Editor’s Letter (Page 6) Chief Learning Officer- September 2008 - Editor’s Letter (Page 7) Chief Learning Officer- September 2008 - Editor’s Letter (Page 8) Chief Learning Officer- September 2008 - Contents (Page 9) Chief Learning Officer- September 2008 - Contents (Page 10) Chief Learning Officer- September 2008 - Contents (Page 11) Chief Learning Officer- September 2008 - Connections (Page 12) Chief Learning Officer- September 2008 - Connections (Page 13) Chief Learning Officer- September 2008 - Imperatives (Page 14) Chief Learning Officer- September 2008 - Imperatives (Page 15) Chief Learning Officer- September 2008 - Selling Up, Selling Down (Page 16) Chief Learning Officer- September 2008 - Selling Up, Selling Down (Page 17) Chief Learning Officer- September 2008 - Strategies (Page 18) Chief Learning Officer- September 2008 - Strategies (Page 19) Chief Learning Officer- September 2008 - Take Five (Page 20) Chief Learning Officer- September 2008 - Take Five (Page 21) Chief Learning Officer- September 2008 - Lifestyle Learning: Improve the Bottom Line With Behavioral Education (Page 22) Chief Learning Officer- September 2008 - Lifestyle Learning: Improve the Bottom Line With Behavioral Education (Page 23) Chief Learning Officer- September 2008 - Tracom’s Social Style Model (Page 24) Chief Learning Officer- September 2008 - Tracom’s Social Style Model (Page 25) Chief Learning Officer- September 2008 - Tracom’s Social Style Model (Page 26) Chief Learning Officer- September 2008 - Tracom’s Social Style Model (Page 27) Chief Learning Officer- September 2008 - CLO Profile (Page 28) Chief Learning Officer- September 2008 - CLO Profile (Page 29) Chief Learning Officer- September 2008 - CLO Profile (Page 30) Chief Learning Officer- September 2008 - CLO Profile (Page 31) Chief Learning Officer- September 2008 - IOL: Determining the Impact of Learning (Page 32) Chief Learning Officer- September 2008 - IOL: Determining the Impact of Learning (Page 33) Chief Learning Officer- September 2008 - Communicating With the Boss About Impact (Page 34) Chief Learning Officer- September 2008 - Communicating With the Boss About Impact (Page 35) Chief Learning Officer- September 2008 - Communicating With the Boss About Impact (Page 36) Chief Learning Officer- September 2008 - Communicating With the Boss About Impact (Page 37) Chief Learning Officer- September 2008 - Mission Accomplished? Measuring Success of Corporate Universities (Page 38) Chief Learning Officer- September 2008 - Mission Accomplished? Measuring Success of Corporate Universities (Page 39) Chief Learning Officer- September 2008 - Borrowing Measurement Practices From Investors (Page 40) Chief Learning Officer- September 2008 - Borrowing Measurement Practices From Investors (Page 41) Chief Learning Officer- September 2008 - Borrowing Measurement Practices From Investors (Page 42) Chief Learning Officer- September 2008 - Borrowing Measurement Practices From Investors (Page 43) Chief Learning Officer- September 2008 - Borrowing Measurement Practices From Investors (Page 44) Chief Learning Officer- September 2008 - Borrowing Measurement Practices From Investors (Page 45) Chief Learning Officer- September 2008 - Value Creation With Human Capital Investment (Page 46) Chief Learning Officer- September 2008 - Value Creation With Human Capital Investment (Page 47) Chief Learning Officer- September 2008 - Business Impact Analysis at Chrysler (Page 48) Chief Learning Officer- September 2008 - Business Impact Analysis at Chrysler (Page 49) Chief Learning Officer- September 2008 - Business Impact Analysis at Chrysler (Page 50) Chief Learning Officer- September 2008 - Business Impact Analysis at Chrysler (Page 51) Chief Learning Officer- September 2008 - Learning or Performance Enhancement: Which Is It? (Page 52) Chief Learning Officer- September 2008 - Learning or Performance Enhancement: Which Is It? (Page 53) Chief Learning Officer- September 2008 - Learning or Performance Enhancement: Which Is It? (Page 54) Chief Learning Officer- September 2008 - Learning or Performance Enhancement: Which Is It? (Page 55) Chief Learning Officer- September 2008 - Learning or Performance Enhancement: Which Is It? (Page 56) Chief Learning Officer- September 2008 - Best Practices in Global Project Management Training (Page 57) Chief Learning Officer- September 2008 - Case Study (Page 58) Chief Learning Officer- September 2008 - Case Study (Page 59) Chief Learning Officer- September 2008 - Case Study (Page 60) Chief Learning Officer- September 2008 - Case Study (Page 61) Chief Learning Officer- September 2008 - Business Intelligence (Page 62) Chief Learning Officer- September 2008 - Business Intelligence (Page 63) Chief Learning Officer- September 2008 - Business Intelligence (Page 64) Chief Learning Officer- September 2008 - Editorial Resources (Page 65) Chief Learning Officer- September 2008 - In Conclusion (Page 66) Chief Learning Officer- September 2008 - In Conclusion (Page Cover3) Chief Learning Officer- September 2008 - In Conclusion (Page Cover4)
For optimal viewing of this digital publication, please enable JavaScript and then refresh the page. If you would like to try to load the digital publication without using Flash Player detection, please click here.