Chief Learning Officer- September 2008 - (Page 48) IN PRACTICE BUSINESS IMPACT ANALYSIS AT CHRYSLER F ew industries in the American economy are under as much pressure as the auto industry. Under the assault of higher fuel prices, new global competitors and rapid market changes, every American automotive company is challenged to find new approaches to serve customers. Innovation is the key to success, and such innovation is taking place at Chrysler Academy, the company’s retail training organization. For years, many in the auto industry believed the manufacturer’s role in training dealership sales personnel should focus on product knowledge. Skills training was considered the domain of the dealer. Yet, based on internal and independent surveys, it appeared some dealers were not getting the job done. Chrysler Academy was teaching product knowledge. Fred DePerez, senior manager for sales and product training at the Chrysler Academy, concluded that there was an opportunity to provide additional training. Based upon that belief, he became the champion for the innovation. DePerez faced two challenges: 1. To convince Chrysler corporate management that an investment in skills training by the company had significant potential to increase sales. 2. To build a curriculum that could be proven to deliver the skills needed to increase sales. The investment case had to be based on data to convince others the academy should tackle this previously taboo discipline of “skills.” The approach was to collaborate with Chrysler’s training partners from BBDO Detroit’s Retail Performance Solutions group. The first step was to conduct an in-depth task analysis with top-performing sales consultants. This resulted in a retail performance map and gap analysis that defined the areas of highest training need. Several key selling skills were among the largest gaps. The research led to two key goals: 1. Design a Chrysler Academy sales consultant skills training curriculum with priority on the largest gaps. 2. Measure the impact of the new curriculum on two key performance indicators (KPIs): vehicle sales and salesconsultant retention. With the data from the gap analysis in hand, the academy was able to convince senior management to make the required investments in skills training. The ultimate proof, though, would be to definitively show improvement in the KPIs and to be able to claim the improvement was the direct result of the academy training — and not the result of the many other factors that influence vehicle sales. To answer the business-impact question, the analysis had to go beyond traditional measurements. In late 2007, the research team was expanded to include Capital Analytics and Bellevue University. A statistically based experiment was designed to include approximately 33,800 consultants (8,500 fully trained, 11,600 partially trained and 13,700 untrained who served as the control group). In all, more than 40 models were tested. By comparing the performance of the trained groups before and after training against the untrained control group, the data documented the business impact of the new training. Sales consultant training improved unit sales volume: 1. Fully trained consultants saw an average sales gain of 15.6 vehicles annually over untrained consultants and 12.2 vehicles annually for partially trained consultants. 2. Consultants who participated in prior training but not in the new curriculum saw a decrease in unit sales. Sales consultant training also improved retention: 1. Retention among fully trained consultants was 98.9 percent during the study period compared to 47.8 percent for untrained consultants. 2. Retention of fully trained new hires was 97.9 percent, while it sank to 38.3 percent for untrained new hires. With the statistically defensible business outcome measurements, Chrysler Academy continues to innovate in curriculum development. Equally important, the hard evidence is working to convince independent dealers their investment in the new sales consultant curriculum is worth their time and capital. – Michael E. Echols from organization to organization is in the prioritization of the items on the list. If the measurements are taking place, what is missing in the linkage of these outcomes to learning interventions? The first thing that must happen is to get senior operating management to agree on the value of changes in the desired outcomes. Revenue is easy. A $1 increase in revenue is valued at $1. While we are on the easiest outcome to measure value, let’s introduce the contentious issue, namely the finance manager’s pushback in some form of this 48 Chief Learning Officer • September 2008 • www.clomedia.com question: “How do you know the $1 increase in revenue resulted from your learning program and not something else?” We will return to this linkage issue in a moment. In the meantime, let’s discuss the missing part of the executive’s outcome list: retention. The issue is not whether the business measures retention. Almost every organization does, and if it doesn’t, it should be in the face of the inevitable retirement of the baby boomers. The issue in retention is management alignment around the value of http://www.clomedia.com
Table of Contents Feed for the Digital Edition of Chief Learning Officer- September 2008 Chief Learning Officer Editor’s Letter Contents Connections Imperatives Selling Up, Selling Down Strategies Take Five Lifestyle Learning: Improve the Bottom Line With Behavioral Education Tracom’s Social Style Model CLO Profile IOL: Determining the Impact of Learning Communicating With the Boss About Impact Mission Accomplished? Measuring Success of Corporate Universities Borrowing Measurement Practices From Investors Value Creation With Human Capital Investment Business Impact Analysis at Chrysler Learning or Performance Enhancement: Which Is It? Best Practices in Global Project Management Training Case Study Business Intelligence Advertisers’ Index Editorial Resources In Conclusion Chief Learning Officer- September 2008 Chief Learning Officer- September 2008 - Chief Learning Officer (Page Cover1) Chief Learning Officer- September 2008 - Chief Learning Officer (Page Cover2) Chief Learning Officer- September 2008 - Chief Learning Officer (Page 3) Chief Learning Officer- September 2008 - Editor’s Letter (Page 4) Chief Learning Officer- September 2008 - Editor’s Letter (Page 5) Chief Learning Officer- September 2008 - Editor’s Letter (Page 6) Chief Learning Officer- September 2008 - Editor’s Letter (Page 7) Chief Learning Officer- September 2008 - Editor’s Letter (Page 8) Chief Learning Officer- September 2008 - Contents (Page 9) Chief Learning Officer- September 2008 - Contents (Page 10) Chief Learning Officer- September 2008 - Contents (Page 11) Chief Learning Officer- September 2008 - Connections (Page 12) Chief Learning Officer- September 2008 - Connections (Page 13) Chief Learning Officer- September 2008 - Imperatives (Page 14) Chief Learning Officer- September 2008 - Imperatives (Page 15) Chief Learning Officer- September 2008 - Selling Up, Selling Down (Page 16) Chief Learning Officer- September 2008 - Selling Up, Selling Down (Page 17) Chief Learning Officer- September 2008 - Strategies (Page 18) Chief Learning Officer- September 2008 - Strategies (Page 19) Chief Learning Officer- September 2008 - Take Five (Page 20) Chief Learning Officer- September 2008 - Take Five (Page 21) Chief Learning Officer- September 2008 - Lifestyle Learning: Improve the Bottom Line With Behavioral Education (Page 22) Chief Learning Officer- September 2008 - Lifestyle Learning: Improve the Bottom Line With Behavioral Education (Page 23) Chief Learning Officer- September 2008 - Tracom’s Social Style Model (Page 24) Chief Learning Officer- September 2008 - Tracom’s Social Style Model (Page 25) Chief Learning Officer- September 2008 - Tracom’s Social Style Model (Page 26) Chief Learning Officer- September 2008 - Tracom’s Social Style Model (Page 27) Chief Learning Officer- September 2008 - CLO Profile (Page 28) Chief Learning Officer- September 2008 - CLO Profile (Page 29) Chief Learning Officer- September 2008 - CLO Profile (Page 30) Chief Learning Officer- September 2008 - CLO Profile (Page 31) Chief Learning Officer- September 2008 - IOL: Determining the Impact of Learning (Page 32) Chief Learning Officer- September 2008 - IOL: Determining the Impact of Learning (Page 33) Chief Learning Officer- September 2008 - Communicating With the Boss About Impact (Page 34) Chief Learning Officer- September 2008 - Communicating With the Boss About Impact (Page 35) Chief Learning Officer- September 2008 - Communicating With the Boss About Impact (Page 36) Chief Learning Officer- September 2008 - Communicating With the Boss About Impact (Page 37) Chief Learning Officer- September 2008 - Mission Accomplished? Measuring Success of Corporate Universities (Page 38) Chief Learning Officer- September 2008 - Mission Accomplished? Measuring Success of Corporate Universities (Page 39) Chief Learning Officer- September 2008 - Borrowing Measurement Practices From Investors (Page 40) Chief Learning Officer- September 2008 - Borrowing Measurement Practices From Investors (Page 41) Chief Learning Officer- September 2008 - Borrowing Measurement Practices From Investors (Page 42) Chief Learning Officer- September 2008 - Borrowing Measurement Practices From Investors (Page 43) Chief Learning Officer- September 2008 - Borrowing Measurement Practices From Investors (Page 44) Chief Learning Officer- September 2008 - Borrowing Measurement Practices From Investors (Page 45) Chief Learning Officer- September 2008 - Value Creation With Human Capital Investment (Page 46) Chief Learning Officer- September 2008 - Value Creation With Human Capital Investment (Page 47) Chief Learning Officer- September 2008 - Business Impact Analysis at Chrysler (Page 48) Chief Learning Officer- September 2008 - Business Impact Analysis at Chrysler (Page 49) Chief Learning Officer- September 2008 - Business Impact Analysis at Chrysler (Page 50) Chief Learning Officer- September 2008 - Business Impact Analysis at Chrysler (Page 51) Chief Learning Officer- September 2008 - Learning or Performance Enhancement: Which Is It? (Page 52) Chief Learning Officer- September 2008 - Learning or Performance Enhancement: Which Is It? (Page 53) Chief Learning Officer- September 2008 - Learning or Performance Enhancement: Which Is It? (Page 54) Chief Learning Officer- September 2008 - Learning or Performance Enhancement: Which Is It? (Page 55) Chief Learning Officer- September 2008 - Learning or Performance Enhancement: Which Is It? (Page 56) Chief Learning Officer- September 2008 - Best Practices in Global Project Management Training (Page 57) Chief Learning Officer- September 2008 - Case Study (Page 58) Chief Learning Officer- September 2008 - Case Study (Page 59) Chief Learning Officer- September 2008 - Case Study (Page 60) Chief Learning Officer- September 2008 - Case Study (Page 61) Chief Learning Officer- September 2008 - Business Intelligence (Page 62) Chief Learning Officer- September 2008 - Business Intelligence (Page 63) Chief Learning Officer- September 2008 - Business Intelligence (Page 64) Chief Learning Officer- September 2008 - Editorial Resources (Page 65) Chief Learning Officer- September 2008 - In Conclusion (Page 66) Chief Learning Officer- September 2008 - In Conclusion (Page Cover3) Chief Learning Officer- September 2008 - In Conclusion (Page Cover4)
For optimal viewing of this digital publication, please enable JavaScript and then refresh the page. If you would like to try to load the digital publication without using Flash Player detection, please click here.