Chief Learning Officer- September 2008 - (Page 62) BUSINESS INTELLIGENCE Training Outsourcing on the Decline BY CUSHING ANDERSON Chief Learning Officer magazine’s Business Intelligence Board survey results illustrate that the number of companies using training outsourcing has declined, but those that outsource are happy with the results. t is commonly recognized that companies need of the term by the marketplace. The results suggest effective training programs to transfer knowl- that enterprises use the term “training outsourcing edge and skills to employees, customers and provider” synonymously with the use of external partners; to retain employees; and to improve training providers. For the purpose of this article, we speed to proficiency. Training programs can be will adopt this broader usage of training outsourcing grown organically over time, developed in-house, for our analysis. outsourced to a training provider or implemented using some combination of in-house and external Declining Use of Training Outsourcing During the past several years, two-thirds (66 perexpertise. The decision to outsource rests mainly on whether the needed volume and quality of training cent) of enterprises outsourced some of their training can be supported by the internal staff. functions. In 2007, this number dipped to 64 perEvery other month, IDC surveys Chief Learning cent, and as seen in Figure 1, this percentage went Officer magazine’s Business Intelligence Board (BIB) down again to 56 percent for 2008. The unpredicton a variety of topics to measure able economy may be a factor, as the attitudes, issues and interests internal training resources are beDATA POINT of senior training executives. This ing pushed to a higher utilization For 2009, 85 percent month’s topic is training outsourcto curtail costs and spending on of companies expect ing, and 393 BIB members particiexternal providers is reduced. This spending on training pated in the survey. is an interesting change in the suroutsourcing to increase More than 56 percent of the envey responses, as many of the other or remain the same. terprises surveyed use outside probehaviors in training outsourcing viders to fulfill some aspect of their have remained remarkably consistraining functions, primarily outsourcing content tent during the past three years. development, training delivery and LMS. Overall, Most companies outsource only select portions those enterprises that outsource training are satisfied of their training functions — only about 2 percent with the services they receive and plan to increase or outsource the entire training function. This percentmaintain current spending levels for 2009. age has remained relatively steady, even though the number of enterprises outsourcing some or all of Defining Training Outsourcing their training function has declined. IDC defines training outsourcing as the ongoing transfer of the management and execution of one Spend on Training Outsourcing Spending on outsourcing as a percent of overall or more complete training processes to an external training budgets reveals a bell curve skewed toward services provider. However, it is clear from the survey results during the left. The majority of companies spend less than the past several years that this is not the current use 40 percent of their training budget on training out- I 62 Chief Learning Officer • September 2008 • www.clomedia.com http://www.clomedia.com
Table of Contents Feed for the Digital Edition of Chief Learning Officer- September 2008 Chief Learning Officer Editor’s Letter Contents Connections Imperatives Selling Up, Selling Down Strategies Take Five Lifestyle Learning: Improve the Bottom Line With Behavioral Education Tracom’s Social Style Model CLO Profile IOL: Determining the Impact of Learning Communicating With the Boss About Impact Mission Accomplished? Measuring Success of Corporate Universities Borrowing Measurement Practices From Investors Value Creation With Human Capital Investment Business Impact Analysis at Chrysler Learning or Performance Enhancement: Which Is It? Best Practices in Global Project Management Training Case Study Business Intelligence Advertisers’ Index Editorial Resources In Conclusion Chief Learning Officer- September 2008 Chief Learning Officer- September 2008 - Chief Learning Officer (Page Cover1) Chief Learning Officer- September 2008 - Chief Learning Officer (Page Cover2) Chief Learning Officer- September 2008 - Chief Learning Officer (Page 3) Chief Learning Officer- September 2008 - Editor’s Letter (Page 4) Chief Learning Officer- September 2008 - Editor’s Letter (Page 5) Chief Learning Officer- September 2008 - Editor’s Letter (Page 6) Chief Learning Officer- September 2008 - Editor’s Letter (Page 7) Chief Learning Officer- September 2008 - Editor’s Letter (Page 8) Chief Learning Officer- September 2008 - Contents (Page 9) Chief Learning Officer- September 2008 - Contents (Page 10) Chief Learning Officer- September 2008 - Contents (Page 11) Chief Learning Officer- September 2008 - Connections (Page 12) Chief Learning Officer- September 2008 - Connections (Page 13) Chief Learning Officer- September 2008 - Imperatives (Page 14) Chief Learning Officer- September 2008 - Imperatives (Page 15) Chief Learning Officer- September 2008 - Selling Up, Selling Down (Page 16) Chief Learning Officer- September 2008 - Selling Up, Selling Down (Page 17) Chief Learning Officer- September 2008 - Strategies (Page 18) Chief Learning Officer- September 2008 - Strategies (Page 19) Chief Learning Officer- September 2008 - Take Five (Page 20) Chief Learning Officer- September 2008 - Take Five (Page 21) Chief Learning Officer- September 2008 - Lifestyle Learning: Improve the Bottom Line With Behavioral Education (Page 22) Chief Learning Officer- September 2008 - Lifestyle Learning: Improve the Bottom Line With Behavioral Education (Page 23) Chief Learning Officer- September 2008 - Tracom’s Social Style Model (Page 24) Chief Learning Officer- September 2008 - Tracom’s Social Style Model (Page 25) Chief Learning Officer- September 2008 - Tracom’s Social Style Model (Page 26) Chief Learning Officer- September 2008 - Tracom’s Social Style Model (Page 27) Chief Learning Officer- September 2008 - CLO Profile (Page 28) Chief Learning Officer- September 2008 - CLO Profile (Page 29) Chief Learning Officer- September 2008 - CLO Profile (Page 30) Chief Learning Officer- September 2008 - CLO Profile (Page 31) Chief Learning Officer- September 2008 - IOL: Determining the Impact of Learning (Page 32) Chief Learning Officer- September 2008 - IOL: Determining the Impact of Learning (Page 33) Chief Learning Officer- September 2008 - Communicating With the Boss About Impact (Page 34) Chief Learning Officer- September 2008 - Communicating With the Boss About Impact (Page 35) Chief Learning Officer- September 2008 - Communicating With the Boss About Impact (Page 36) Chief Learning Officer- September 2008 - Communicating With the Boss About Impact (Page 37) Chief Learning Officer- September 2008 - Mission Accomplished? Measuring Success of Corporate Universities (Page 38) Chief Learning Officer- September 2008 - Mission Accomplished? Measuring Success of Corporate Universities (Page 39) Chief Learning Officer- September 2008 - Borrowing Measurement Practices From Investors (Page 40) Chief Learning Officer- September 2008 - Borrowing Measurement Practices From Investors (Page 41) Chief Learning Officer- September 2008 - Borrowing Measurement Practices From Investors (Page 42) Chief Learning Officer- September 2008 - Borrowing Measurement Practices From Investors (Page 43) Chief Learning Officer- September 2008 - Borrowing Measurement Practices From Investors (Page 44) Chief Learning Officer- September 2008 - Borrowing Measurement Practices From Investors (Page 45) Chief Learning Officer- September 2008 - Value Creation With Human Capital Investment (Page 46) Chief Learning Officer- September 2008 - Value Creation With Human Capital Investment (Page 47) Chief Learning Officer- September 2008 - Business Impact Analysis at Chrysler (Page 48) Chief Learning Officer- September 2008 - Business Impact Analysis at Chrysler (Page 49) Chief Learning Officer- September 2008 - Business Impact Analysis at Chrysler (Page 50) Chief Learning Officer- September 2008 - Business Impact Analysis at Chrysler (Page 51) Chief Learning Officer- September 2008 - Learning or Performance Enhancement: Which Is It? (Page 52) Chief Learning Officer- September 2008 - Learning or Performance Enhancement: Which Is It? (Page 53) Chief Learning Officer- September 2008 - Learning or Performance Enhancement: Which Is It? (Page 54) Chief Learning Officer- September 2008 - Learning or Performance Enhancement: Which Is It? (Page 55) Chief Learning Officer- September 2008 - Learning or Performance Enhancement: Which Is It? (Page 56) Chief Learning Officer- September 2008 - Best Practices in Global Project Management Training (Page 57) Chief Learning Officer- September 2008 - Case Study (Page 58) Chief Learning Officer- September 2008 - Case Study (Page 59) Chief Learning Officer- September 2008 - Case Study (Page 60) Chief Learning Officer- September 2008 - Case Study (Page 61) Chief Learning Officer- September 2008 - Business Intelligence (Page 62) Chief Learning Officer- September 2008 - Business Intelligence (Page 63) Chief Learning Officer- September 2008 - Business Intelligence (Page 64) Chief Learning Officer- September 2008 - Editorial Resources (Page 65) Chief Learning Officer- September 2008 - In Conclusion (Page 66) Chief Learning Officer- September 2008 - In Conclusion (Page Cover3) Chief Learning Officer- September 2008 - In Conclusion (Page Cover4)
For optimal viewing of this digital publication, please enable JavaScript and then refresh the page. If you would like to try to load the digital publication without using Flash Player detection, please click here.