Chief Learning Officer- September 2008 - (Page 63) FIGURE 1: HAS YOUR COMPANY OUTSOURCED ANY PART OF ITS TRAINING FUNCTION? were custom content design/ development, training deliv80 ery, strategy development, ■ Yes program oversight and learn60 ■ No ing technology management. 40 Reporting and measurement was a not-too-distant sixth 20 choice. 0 Figure 2 compares the im2008 2007 portance of training functions Source: CLO BIB Training Outsourcing Survey, June 2008 against the training functions most frequently outsourced in an effort to determine if FIGURE 2: THE MOST IMPORTANT TRAINING ACTIVITIES highly important, or lesser VS. ACTIVITIES OUTSOURCED important, training functions are the ones chosen for 80 outsourcing, or if it is related ■ Activity importance to front- or back-office func■ Activity outsourced tions. There appears to be a 60 correlation between the importance of the activity and 40 activities outsourced for the three areas of custom content, 20 training delivery and LMS. However, those training functions that are highly im0 portant but require the transfer of management responsibilities to execute — such as strategy development, program oversight and reporting and measurement — show low popularity for outsourcsourcing, with about half spending between 10 pering. It seems that companies are using external traincent and 40 percent of their training budget. Coning providers primarily for activities that are imporversely, only 20 percent spend more than 40 percent tant but do not require the transfer of management of their budget, and the 3 percent who spend more authority. than 80 percent are probably mostly organizations The top two reasons to outsource, by a clear mathat outsource the entire training function. jority of companies, were to deliver more training For 2009, 85 percent of companies expect spend- than internal resources can provide and to access exing on training outsourcing to increase or remain the pertise. These reasons remain consistent from 2007. same. This indicates that while the number of com- Reducing costs, the third most popular reason, also panies that are outsourcing have declined this year, is an important benefit from outsourcing, and it has the companies that are outsourcing are satisfied with become more important to enterprises, while speed their use of external training providers. Only 15 per- to market has dropped in importance. Both of these cent of companies indicated their training outsourc- changes appear to be tied to the current economic ing budgets will decrease next year. situation as organizations seek to “hunker down” rather than pursue new opportunities. Outsourcing and Management Control Those companies that are outsourcing training In an effort to further determine why certain functions primarily to supplement internal resources training activities are outsourced, managers were do so to have training resources available on an asasked to identify the top five most important overall needed basis. Companies looking to deliver training training functions. These, in order of importance, beyond the capabilities of internal resources consider sig Custo n/d m eve con lop ten me t nt Tra inin gd eliv Str ery ate gy de vel op me nt Pro gra mo ver sig Lea ht rnin gt ech ma nag nolo em gy ent Re po me rtin asu g a rem nd Ven ent do rm ana ge me nt de cs En ma rol nag lme em nt ent Log isti Chief Learning Officer • September 2008 • www.clomedia.com 63 http://www.clomedia.com
Table of Contents Feed for the Digital Edition of Chief Learning Officer- September 2008 Chief Learning Officer Editor’s Letter Contents Connections Imperatives Selling Up, Selling Down Strategies Take Five Lifestyle Learning: Improve the Bottom Line With Behavioral Education Tracom’s Social Style Model CLO Profile IOL: Determining the Impact of Learning Communicating With the Boss About Impact Mission Accomplished? Measuring Success of Corporate Universities Borrowing Measurement Practices From Investors Value Creation With Human Capital Investment Business Impact Analysis at Chrysler Learning or Performance Enhancement: Which Is It? Best Practices in Global Project Management Training Case Study Business Intelligence Advertisers’ Index Editorial Resources In Conclusion Chief Learning Officer- September 2008 Chief Learning Officer- September 2008 - Chief Learning Officer (Page Cover1) Chief Learning Officer- September 2008 - Chief Learning Officer (Page Cover2) Chief Learning Officer- September 2008 - Chief Learning Officer (Page 3) Chief Learning Officer- September 2008 - Editor’s Letter (Page 4) Chief Learning Officer- September 2008 - Editor’s Letter (Page 5) Chief Learning Officer- September 2008 - Editor’s Letter (Page 6) Chief Learning Officer- September 2008 - Editor’s Letter (Page 7) Chief Learning Officer- September 2008 - Editor’s Letter (Page 8) Chief Learning Officer- September 2008 - Contents (Page 9) Chief Learning Officer- September 2008 - Contents (Page 10) Chief Learning Officer- September 2008 - Contents (Page 11) Chief Learning Officer- September 2008 - Connections (Page 12) Chief Learning Officer- September 2008 - Connections (Page 13) Chief Learning Officer- September 2008 - Imperatives (Page 14) Chief Learning Officer- September 2008 - Imperatives (Page 15) Chief Learning Officer- September 2008 - Selling Up, Selling Down (Page 16) Chief Learning Officer- September 2008 - Selling Up, Selling Down (Page 17) Chief Learning Officer- September 2008 - Strategies (Page 18) Chief Learning Officer- September 2008 - Strategies (Page 19) Chief Learning Officer- September 2008 - Take Five (Page 20) Chief Learning Officer- September 2008 - Take Five (Page 21) Chief Learning Officer- September 2008 - Lifestyle Learning: Improve the Bottom Line With Behavioral Education (Page 22) Chief Learning Officer- September 2008 - Lifestyle Learning: Improve the Bottom Line With Behavioral Education (Page 23) Chief Learning Officer- September 2008 - Tracom’s Social Style Model (Page 24) Chief Learning Officer- September 2008 - Tracom’s Social Style Model (Page 25) Chief Learning Officer- September 2008 - Tracom’s Social Style Model (Page 26) Chief Learning Officer- September 2008 - Tracom’s Social Style Model (Page 27) Chief Learning Officer- September 2008 - CLO Profile (Page 28) Chief Learning Officer- September 2008 - CLO Profile (Page 29) Chief Learning Officer- September 2008 - CLO Profile (Page 30) Chief Learning Officer- September 2008 - CLO Profile (Page 31) Chief Learning Officer- September 2008 - IOL: Determining the Impact of Learning (Page 32) Chief Learning Officer- September 2008 - IOL: Determining the Impact of Learning (Page 33) Chief Learning Officer- September 2008 - Communicating With the Boss About Impact (Page 34) Chief Learning Officer- September 2008 - Communicating With the Boss About Impact (Page 35) Chief Learning Officer- September 2008 - Communicating With the Boss About Impact (Page 36) Chief Learning Officer- September 2008 - Communicating With the Boss About Impact (Page 37) Chief Learning Officer- September 2008 - Mission Accomplished? Measuring Success of Corporate Universities (Page 38) Chief Learning Officer- September 2008 - Mission Accomplished? Measuring Success of Corporate Universities (Page 39) Chief Learning Officer- September 2008 - Borrowing Measurement Practices From Investors (Page 40) Chief Learning Officer- September 2008 - Borrowing Measurement Practices From Investors (Page 41) Chief Learning Officer- September 2008 - Borrowing Measurement Practices From Investors (Page 42) Chief Learning Officer- September 2008 - Borrowing Measurement Practices From Investors (Page 43) Chief Learning Officer- September 2008 - Borrowing Measurement Practices From Investors (Page 44) Chief Learning Officer- September 2008 - Borrowing Measurement Practices From Investors (Page 45) Chief Learning Officer- September 2008 - Value Creation With Human Capital Investment (Page 46) Chief Learning Officer- September 2008 - Value Creation With Human Capital Investment (Page 47) Chief Learning Officer- September 2008 - Business Impact Analysis at Chrysler (Page 48) Chief Learning Officer- September 2008 - Business Impact Analysis at Chrysler (Page 49) Chief Learning Officer- September 2008 - Business Impact Analysis at Chrysler (Page 50) Chief Learning Officer- September 2008 - Business Impact Analysis at Chrysler (Page 51) Chief Learning Officer- September 2008 - Learning or Performance Enhancement: Which Is It? (Page 52) Chief Learning Officer- September 2008 - Learning or Performance Enhancement: Which Is It? (Page 53) Chief Learning Officer- September 2008 - Learning or Performance Enhancement: Which Is It? (Page 54) Chief Learning Officer- September 2008 - Learning or Performance Enhancement: Which Is It? (Page 55) Chief Learning Officer- September 2008 - Learning or Performance Enhancement: Which Is It? (Page 56) Chief Learning Officer- September 2008 - Best Practices in Global Project Management Training (Page 57) Chief Learning Officer- September 2008 - Case Study (Page 58) Chief Learning Officer- September 2008 - Case Study (Page 59) Chief Learning Officer- September 2008 - Case Study (Page 60) Chief Learning Officer- September 2008 - Case Study (Page 61) Chief Learning Officer- September 2008 - Business Intelligence (Page 62) Chief Learning Officer- September 2008 - Business Intelligence (Page 63) Chief Learning Officer- September 2008 - Business Intelligence (Page 64) Chief Learning Officer- September 2008 - Editorial Resources (Page 65) Chief Learning Officer- September 2008 - In Conclusion (Page 66) Chief Learning Officer- September 2008 - In Conclusion (Page Cover3) Chief Learning Officer- September 2008 - In Conclusion (Page Cover4)
For optimal viewing of this digital publication, please enable JavaScript and then refresh the page. If you would like to try to load the digital publication without using Flash Player detection, please click here.