Chief Learning Officer - October 2008 - (Page 56) stop with business processes and the elimination of data silos. In a 2007 Gartner report, analyst James Holincheck wrote, “The lack of integration between talent management applications can cause many issues for companies in gaining strategic value from their investments. From a line manager’s point of view, there are multiple applications with multiple user interfaces that do not work the same way. The user experience for creating a requisition or providing interview feedback in recruiting is different from the experience for writing or approving a performance review and possibly different from the experience for merit increase planning. This can be confusing to managers.” CASE STUDY continued from page 51 General Benefits of Accreditation What could accreditation mean in other learning environments? It could be an opportunity to improve the quality of a learning organization. It could help in evaluating and comparing courses and programs, facilities and procedures with those of others. The organization could receive public recognition as an institution that has met industry-wide standards. However, the greatest value of accreditation is undergoing the process itself, a process of self-evaluation and peer review that ensures programs and policies embody “standards of good practice.” There are many choices for accreditation. Learning leaders should consider what type of accreditation program is right for their corporate universities or learning and development organizations based on organizational priorities. A typical accreditation process takes one and a half years of preparation and involves a self-evaluation, comparing programs to established standards and identifying areas of comparable strength and needed improvement. The results of the self-evaluation are verified on-site by a team of evaluators and subsequently by the accreditation authority. An organization must demonstrate it has met all standards before accreditation is conferred. DAU’s self-study was accomplished as part of the institutional reaffirmation of the accreditation process set forth by COE. Compiling the self-study was a collaborative effort between DAU staff, faculty and leadership, giving the organization an opportunity to examine the critical processes supporting its vision of being a premier corporate university serving the AT&L community. Preparing the self-study also provided DAU with an excellent forum for identifying areas in which improvement could be made and prioritizing them in its strategic-planning process. Dr. Sue Stein, action officer for DAU’s COE accreditation, led the integrated process team that represented a cross section of the entire university. In addition to and complementing the COE accreditation program, DAU uses other sources of standards, such as the International Association for Continuing Education and Training, American Council on Education and DAU’s market-sector professional association criteria or sector leadership program. Leveraging market-sector professional association or sector leadership criteria, DAU has received many awards as a corporate university. These awards are standards-based and promote measuring DAU’s performance against nationally recognized measures of success. Today, DAU is recognized as one of America’s leading training institutions. “As we improve our mission-support capability, we are moving toward becoming one of the best corporate universities recognized inside and outside DOD for excellence in education and as a leader in the creation, integration, dissemination and application of knowledge,” DAU President Frank Anderson said. “We will continue to actively participate in initiatives to help streamline processes and incorporate new concepts and technology. DAU’s continuing involvement in the accreditation process will provide the sense of direction necessary for the superior attainment of our mission.” CLO Dr. Chris Hardy is director of the Learning Technology Center at DAU. He can be reached at editor@clomedia.com. The benefits of integrated learning and HR functions are lost if users do not adopt and embrace the solution. With a consistent user interface, organizations can drive a higher user adoption. The benefits of integrated learning and HR functions are lost if users do not adopt and embrace the solution. As learning executives work with HR to embrace enterprise-wide talent management strategies, they must consider the ability for solutions to seamlessly fit into a unified architecture and deliver a consistent user experience. Driving True Business Value To stay competitive into the next decade and mitigate the talent crisis, today’s leading learning organizations are adopting new strategies that enable them to develop their existing talent. There is a strong correlation between improving individual productivity and an organization’s ability to develop and retain a solid workforce. Only when learning is considered a strategic part of HR can organizations truly align their people strategies with business strategy to deliver further value and drive increased business performance. CLO Jeff Kristick is a senior vice president at Plateau Systems. He can be reached at editor@clomedia.com. 56 Chief Learning Officer • October 2008 • www.clomedia.com http://www.clomedia.com
Table of Contents Feed for the Digital Edition of Chief Learning Officer - October 2008 Chief Learning Officer - October 2008 Editor’s Letter Connections Business Impact Best Practices Effectiveness Guest Editorial How Fast Is Your ‘B’ Team? Hampton Hotels CLO Profile Save the World, Make a Buck: Seven Ideas From the Nonprofit Sector Developing Leaders at Amnesty International Learning Measurements: It’s Time to Align Aligning Measurement to Business Success Training Employees With Special Needs How to Reach Disabled Learners Hands Off: Facilitating Informal Learning Who Owns Informal Learning? Case Study Business Intelligence Advertisers’ Index Editorial Resources In Conclusion Chief Learning Officer - October 2008 Chief Learning Officer - October 2008 - Chief Learning Officer - October 2008 (Page Cover1) Chief Learning Officer - October 2008 - Chief Learning Officer - October 2008 (Page Cover2) Chief Learning Officer - October 2008 - Chief Learning Officer - October 2008 (Page 3) Chief Learning Officer - October 2008 - Editor’s Letter (Page 4) Chief Learning Officer - October 2008 - Editor’s Letter (Page 5) Chief Learning Officer - October 2008 - Editor’s Letter (Page 6) Chief Learning Officer - October 2008 - Editor’s Letter (Page 7) Chief Learning Officer - October 2008 - Editor’s Letter (Page 8) Chief Learning Officer - October 2008 - Editor’s Letter (Page 9) Chief Learning Officer - October 2008 - Connections (Page 10) Chief Learning Officer - October 2008 - Connections (Page 11) Chief Learning Officer - October 2008 - Business Impact (Page 12) Chief Learning Officer - October 2008 - Business Impact (Page 13) Chief Learning Officer - October 2008 - Best Practices (Page 14) Chief Learning Officer - October 2008 - Best Practices (Page 15) Chief Learning Officer - October 2008 - Effectiveness (Page 16) Chief Learning Officer - October 2008 - Effectiveness (Page 17) Chief Learning Officer - October 2008 - Guest Editorial (Page 18) Chief Learning Officer - October 2008 - Guest Editorial (Page 19) Chief Learning Officer - October 2008 - How Fast Is Your ‘B’ Team? (Page 20) Chief Learning Officer - October 2008 - How Fast Is Your ‘B’ Team? (Page 21) Chief Learning Officer - October 2008 - How Fast Is Your ‘B’ Team? (Page 22) Chief Learning Officer - October 2008 - How Fast Is Your ‘B’ Team? (Page 23) Chief Learning Officer - October 2008 - Hampton Hotels (Page 24) Chief Learning Officer - October 2008 - Hampton Hotels (Page 25) Chief Learning Officer - October 2008 - CLO Profile (Page 26) Chief Learning Officer - October 2008 - CLO Profile (Page 27) Chief Learning Officer - October 2008 - CLO Profile (Page 28) Chief Learning Officer - October 2008 - CLO Profile (Page 29) Chief Learning Officer - October 2008 - Save the World, Make a Buck: Seven Ideas From the Nonprofit Sector (Page 30) Chief Learning Officer - October 2008 - Save the World, Make a Buck: Seven Ideas From the Nonprofit Sector (Page 31) Chief Learning Officer - October 2008 - Developing Leaders at Amnesty International (Page 32) Chief Learning Officer - October 2008 - Developing Leaders at Amnesty International (Page 33) Chief Learning Officer - October 2008 - Developing Leaders at Amnesty International (Page 34) Chief Learning Officer - October 2008 - Developing Leaders at Amnesty International (Page 35) Chief Learning Officer - October 2008 - Learning Measurements: It’s Time to Align (Page 36) Chief Learning Officer - October 2008 - Learning Measurements: It’s Time to Align (Page 37) Chief Learning Officer - October 2008 - Aligning Measurement to Business Success (Page 38) Chief Learning Officer - October 2008 - Aligning Measurement to Business Success (Page 39) Chief Learning Officer - October 2008 - Aligning Measurement to Business Success (Page 40) Chief Learning Officer - October 2008 - Aligning Measurement to Business Success (Page 41) Chief Learning Officer - October 2008 - Training Employees With Special Needs (Page 42) Chief Learning Officer - October 2008 - Training Employees With Special Needs (Page 43) Chief Learning Officer - October 2008 - Training Employees With Special Needs (Page 44) Chief Learning Officer - October 2008 - How to Reach Disabled Learners (Page 45) Chief Learning Officer - October 2008 - Hands Off: Facilitating Informal Learning (Page 46) Chief Learning Officer - October 2008 - Hands Off: Facilitating Informal Learning (Page 47) Chief Learning Officer - October 2008 - Hands Off: Facilitating Informal Learning (Page 48) Chief Learning Officer - October 2008 - Who Owns Informal Learning? (Page 49) Chief Learning Officer - October 2008 - Case Study (Page 50) Chief Learning Officer - October 2008 - Case Study (Page 51) Chief Learning Officer - October 2008 - Business Intelligence (Page 52) Chief Learning Officer - October 2008 - Business Intelligence (Page 53) Chief Learning Officer - October 2008 - Business Intelligence (Page 54) Chief Learning Officer - October 2008 - Business Intelligence (Page 55) Chief Learning Officer - October 2008 - Business Intelligence (Page 56) Chief Learning Officer - October 2008 - Editorial Resources (Page 57) Chief Learning Officer - October 2008 - In Conclusion (Page 58) Chief Learning Officer - October 2008 - In Conclusion (Page Cover3) Chief Learning Officer - October 2008 - In Conclusion (Page Cover4)
For optimal viewing of this digital publication, please enable JavaScript and then refresh the page. If you would like to try to load the digital publication without using Flash Player detection, please click here.