Talent Management - January 2009 - (Page 35) — convinced Halliday to commit to continuing the investment as a “must have” for the business. At CoBank, a financial cooperative serving rural America, there is a commitment to provide developmental opportunities for every employee and a belief that managers are crucial to build engaged employees and satisfied customers. “We believe that people leave managers rather than companies,” said Bob O’Toole, vice president of human resources. “To ensure we have great managers, we offer a Leadership Excellence curriculum for anyone with one or more direct reports.” Surprisingly, few companies assess behavioral change and the impact of training on critical business performance metrics, despite research from Accenture, Watson Wyatt, Tracom and others showing learning investments have a strong impact and positive ROI. A down market offers two advantages when it comes to conducting such evaluations: First, if an organization pares back course offerings and streamlines outreach, staff may have more time to develop a thoughtful Level 3 or Level 4 evaluation process and implement it. Second, if a company is using outside vendors for training, a tighter market should make the vendors more willing to help research the training programs. Learning providers are more willing to step up to keep a customer satisfied and to get access to data showing the impact of their training. At a minimum, a vendor should be able to provide an organization with ROI studies and research to substantiate the value of their offerings. If a vendor does not have these studies and isn’t willing to help assess training impact, companies should question the vendor’s commitment to achieving anything of value. In a tough economy, there is more scrutiny on spending and a greater need to make a compelling business case for learning. “But by aligning our learning and development strategy with key elements of our business strategy, it’s actually easier to show a return on our efforts,” said O’Toole. Demonstrate Impact In an ideal world, every organization would evaluate the impact of its training programs. However, when an HR department is running full steam with limited staff, it can be difficult to find time to do more than gather “smiley sheets” or perform simple learning assessments. These Level 1 and Level 2 evaluations are a start, but they’re not likely to carry much weight with a CEO who wants to measure impact. Be Efficient, Whatever the Budget A recent white paper from KnowledgePool, a U.K. training consultancy, said organizations with staff of 2,000-plus can reduce learning and development expenses by 30 percent by following best practices and working efficiently. It recommends: • Careful supplier management, including adherence to an authorized supplier list and discount bulk purchasing. • Automating training administration. • More efficiently managing course scheduling to maximize occupancy and minimize empty seats and canceled classes. • Reviewing and modifying training offerings. Course content offered in the past doesn’t always have priority today. Here are some other ways to operate more efficiently: • Tie training to specific business initiatives and job tasks. The more talent managers can make training job-specific using workplace examples, the better. • Balance internal trainers with outside suppliers during peak times. The “day cost” will be higher when using a vendor, but companies will come out ahead if they limit use. • Offer flexible delivery. Ten years ago, more than 50 percent of Tracom’s business was for training programs of two days or more. Today, most are shorter January 2009 BUDGETS continued on page 48 talent management magazine www.talentmgt.com 35 http://www.talentmgt.com
Table of Contents Feed for the Digital Edition of Talent Management - January 2009 Talent Management - January 2009 Editor’s Letter Contents Human Performance Leading Edge Learning Connections Integrate Web 2.0 Into the On-Boarding Experience Show ’Em the Money: Compensation Trends 2009 Transition at the Top How Hollywood Manages Talent and What You Can Learn Get the Most Bang With Limited Training Bucks Life After Layoffs Attract Specific Talent Groups Performance Management: Its Time Is Now Helping the Helpers Advertisers’ Index Editorial Resources Full Potential Talent Management - January 2009 Talent Management - January 2009 - Talent Management - January 2009 (Page Cover1) Talent Management - January 2009 - Talent Management - January 2009 (Page Cover2) Talent Management - January 2009 - Talent Management - January 2009 (Page 3) Talent Management - January 2009 - Editor’s Letter (Page 4) Talent Management - January 2009 - Editor’s Letter (Page 5) Talent Management - January 2009 - Editor’s Letter (Page 6) Talent Management - January 2009 - Editor’s Letter (Page 7) Talent Management - January 2009 - Contents (Page 8) Talent Management - January 2009 - Contents (Page 9) Talent Management - January 2009 - Human Performance (Page 10) Talent Management - January 2009 - Human Performance (Page 11) Talent Management - January 2009 - Leading Edge (Page 12) Talent Management - January 2009 - Leading Edge (Page 13) Talent Management - January 2009 - Learning Connections (Page 14) Talent Management - January 2009 - Learning Connections (Page 15) Talent Management - January 2009 - Learning Connections (Page 16) Talent Management - January 2009 - Learning Connections (Page 17) Talent Management - January 2009 - Integrate Web 2.0 Into the On-Boarding Experience (Page 18) Talent Management - January 2009 - Integrate Web 2.0 Into the On-Boarding Experience (Page 19) Talent Management - January 2009 - Show ’Em the Money: Compensation Trends 2009 (Page 20) Talent Management - January 2009 - Show ’Em the Money: Compensation Trends 2009 (Page 21) Talent Management - January 2009 - Show ’Em the Money: Compensation Trends 2009 (Page 22) Talent Management - January 2009 - Show ’Em the Money: Compensation Trends 2009 (Page 23) Talent Management - January 2009 - Transition at the Top (Page 24) Talent Management - January 2009 - Transition at the Top (Page 25) Talent Management - January 2009 - Transition at the Top (Page 26) Talent Management - January 2009 - Transition at the Top (Page 27) Talent Management - January 2009 - Transition at the Top (Page 28) Talent Management - January 2009 - Transition at the Top (Page 29) Talent Management - January 2009 - How Hollywood Manages Talent and What You Can Learn (Page 30) Talent Management - January 2009 - How Hollywood Manages Talent and What You Can Learn (Page 31) Talent Management - January 2009 - How Hollywood Manages Talent and What You Can Learn (Page 32) Talent Management - January 2009 - How Hollywood Manages Talent and What You Can Learn (Page 33) Talent Management - January 2009 - Get the Most Bang With Limited Training Bucks (Page 34) Talent Management - January 2009 - Get the Most Bang With Limited Training Bucks (Page 35) Talent Management - January 2009 - Life After Layoffs (Page 36) Talent Management - January 2009 - Life After Layoffs (Page 37) Talent Management - January 2009 - Life After Layoffs (Page 38) Talent Management - January 2009 - Life After Layoffs (Page 39) Talent Management - January 2009 - Attract Specific Talent Groups (Page 40) Talent Management - January 2009 - Attract Specific Talent Groups (Page 41) Talent Management - January 2009 - Performance Management: Its Time Is Now (Page 42) Talent Management - January 2009 - Performance Management: Its Time Is Now (Page 43) Talent Management - January 2009 - Performance Management: Its Time Is Now (Page 44) Talent Management - January 2009 - Performance Management: Its Time Is Now (Page 45) Talent Management - January 2009 - Helping the Helpers (Page 46) Talent Management - January 2009 - Helping the Helpers (Page 47) Talent Management - January 2009 - Helping the Helpers (Page 48) Talent Management - January 2009 - Editorial Resources (Page 49) Talent Management - January 2009 - Full Potential (Page 50) Talent Management - January 2009 - Full Potential (Page Cover3) Talent Management - January 2009 - Full Potential (Page Cover4)
For optimal viewing of this digital publication, please enable JavaScript and then refresh the page. If you would like to try to load the digital publication without using Flash Player detection, please click here.