Talent Management - January 2009 - (Page 44) 1. Inconsistent performance planning and appraisals: In this first stage, an organization will support employee performance appraisal for managers to develop performance plans and rate employees annually. Practices usually are not automated, and as a result, they are applied inconsistently. Managers and employees regard performance management as an administrative exercise, not as a business improvement tool. governance. Less than 3 percent of organizations reported they are in this stage. Measuring Performance Management In the past, HR has not had great demand from business users for talent metrics because business users do not know what information to request. Talent measures are perceived to be highly intangible. Further, there are no regulatory requirements or industry standards for reporting this type of information. Today, integrated talent management initiatives require greater transparency of talent information at all levels of the organization. Leading organizations identify talent measures that support business-specific strategies and outcomes, as well as the measures key to more integrated employee performance management. Technology solutions provide analytic tools and dashboards to communicate the status of these measures and often are tailored to different levels of the organization. Following are a few representative examples of “new” measurements now being tracked: percentage of employees with development and career plans; percentage of promotable employees; retention rates for high potentials, high performers and executives; flight risk for high potentials and high performers; hiring sources for high performers; and top performers below standard market compensation. Purchasing and implementing technology without first evaluating and refining processes is akin to putting the cart before the horse. 2. Enterprise-wide performance management: Moving to this stage is difficult. An organization will implement enterprise-wide practices and standards such as goal-setting, common rating scales, core and level competencies, mandatory development plans and pay for performance. To achieve consistency and compliance, many implement a technology solution focused on performance management. Most organizations find themselves at this level. 3. Integrated performance management: In this stage, organizations pursue a more integrated approach with employee performance management at the core of talent strategy. More emphasis is placed on establishing a talent culture. Organizations design performance support for managers as coaches and career managers. Integration points with career and succession management are established. Performance management practices also incorporate high-potential identification to support talent pool management. Competency assessments predict job fit and leadership potential. Employees are encouraged to explore career options based on talent profiles. Because employee performance and talent data are more integrated, managers and business leaders begin to rely on more comparative and integrated talent measures to support decision making and planning. Less than 10 percent of respondents fit into this stage of maturity. 4. Tailored performance management: Organizations focus on the unique needs of workforce segments. Goal-planning, competency management and assessments are tailored for specific groups, business units or geographies. Design considerations are made for operational, legal or cultural factors. Organizations determine which practices must be consistently applied across the organization and which can be customized. Many global organizations establish design teams with representation from various business units to determine operational framework and Technology Considerations The performance management systems market is the fastest-growing segment in the human capital management market and will soon be the biggest. The market was estimated to reach $520 million by the end of 2008, a 35 percent increase from 2007. It has tremendous potential for growth, with only 12 percent penetration in the United States and less than 9 percent globally. If talent leaders evaluate these solutions using a basic features checklist, there are few differences. However, research points out several ways purchasers can differentiate options. For instance, user experiences differ from solution to solution. This is one of the most important factors in a successful implementation. Buyers also must consider feature maturity, global capabilities, domain management, delivery models, price and configurability. To prioritize activities and investments, performance management requires focus. Creating a performance-driven culture, and compensating appropriately within such a culture, is the top business driver identified by research respondents. Integrated talent management brings competitive advantage. To capitalize on this potential, an organization must have a foundation built on strong, well-supported and modern performance management processes. Leighanne Levensaler is director of talent management research for Bersin & Associates, a research and advisory services firm. She can be reached at editor@talentmgt.com. 44 January 2009 talent management magazine www.talentmgt.com http://www.talentmgt.com
Table of Contents Feed for the Digital Edition of Talent Management - January 2009 Talent Management - January 2009 Editor’s Letter Contents Human Performance Leading Edge Learning Connections Integrate Web 2.0 Into the On-Boarding Experience Show ’Em the Money: Compensation Trends 2009 Transition at the Top How Hollywood Manages Talent and What You Can Learn Get the Most Bang With Limited Training Bucks Life After Layoffs Attract Specific Talent Groups Performance Management: Its Time Is Now Helping the Helpers Advertisers’ Index Editorial Resources Full Potential Talent Management - January 2009 Talent Management - January 2009 - Talent Management - January 2009 (Page Cover1) Talent Management - January 2009 - Talent Management - January 2009 (Page Cover2) Talent Management - January 2009 - Talent Management - January 2009 (Page 3) Talent Management - January 2009 - Editor’s Letter (Page 4) Talent Management - January 2009 - Editor’s Letter (Page 5) Talent Management - January 2009 - Editor’s Letter (Page 6) Talent Management - January 2009 - Editor’s Letter (Page 7) Talent Management - January 2009 - Contents (Page 8) Talent Management - January 2009 - Contents (Page 9) Talent Management - January 2009 - Human Performance (Page 10) Talent Management - January 2009 - Human Performance (Page 11) Talent Management - January 2009 - Leading Edge (Page 12) Talent Management - January 2009 - Leading Edge (Page 13) Talent Management - January 2009 - Learning Connections (Page 14) Talent Management - January 2009 - Learning Connections (Page 15) Talent Management - January 2009 - Learning Connections (Page 16) Talent Management - January 2009 - Learning Connections (Page 17) Talent Management - January 2009 - Integrate Web 2.0 Into the On-Boarding Experience (Page 18) Talent Management - January 2009 - Integrate Web 2.0 Into the On-Boarding Experience (Page 19) Talent Management - January 2009 - Show ’Em the Money: Compensation Trends 2009 (Page 20) Talent Management - January 2009 - Show ’Em the Money: Compensation Trends 2009 (Page 21) Talent Management - January 2009 - Show ’Em the Money: Compensation Trends 2009 (Page 22) Talent Management - January 2009 - Show ’Em the Money: Compensation Trends 2009 (Page 23) Talent Management - January 2009 - Transition at the Top (Page 24) Talent Management - January 2009 - Transition at the Top (Page 25) Talent Management - January 2009 - Transition at the Top (Page 26) Talent Management - January 2009 - Transition at the Top (Page 27) Talent Management - January 2009 - Transition at the Top (Page 28) Talent Management - January 2009 - Transition at the Top (Page 29) Talent Management - January 2009 - How Hollywood Manages Talent and What You Can Learn (Page 30) Talent Management - January 2009 - How Hollywood Manages Talent and What You Can Learn (Page 31) Talent Management - January 2009 - How Hollywood Manages Talent and What You Can Learn (Page 32) Talent Management - January 2009 - How Hollywood Manages Talent and What You Can Learn (Page 33) Talent Management - January 2009 - Get the Most Bang With Limited Training Bucks (Page 34) Talent Management - January 2009 - Get the Most Bang With Limited Training Bucks (Page 35) Talent Management - January 2009 - Life After Layoffs (Page 36) Talent Management - January 2009 - Life After Layoffs (Page 37) Talent Management - January 2009 - Life After Layoffs (Page 38) Talent Management - January 2009 - Life After Layoffs (Page 39) Talent Management - January 2009 - Attract Specific Talent Groups (Page 40) Talent Management - January 2009 - Attract Specific Talent Groups (Page 41) Talent Management - January 2009 - Performance Management: Its Time Is Now (Page 42) Talent Management - January 2009 - Performance Management: Its Time Is Now (Page 43) Talent Management - January 2009 - Performance Management: Its Time Is Now (Page 44) Talent Management - January 2009 - Performance Management: Its Time Is Now (Page 45) Talent Management - January 2009 - Helping the Helpers (Page 46) Talent Management - January 2009 - Helping the Helpers (Page 47) Talent Management - January 2009 - Helping the Helpers (Page 48) Talent Management - January 2009 - Editorial Resources (Page 49) Talent Management - January 2009 - Full Potential (Page 50) Talent Management - January 2009 - Full Potential (Page Cover3) Talent Management - January 2009 - Full Potential (Page Cover4)
For optimal viewing of this digital publication, please enable JavaScript and then refresh the page. If you would like to try to load the digital publication without using Flash Player detection, please click here.