TM - March 2008 - (Page 12) [human performance] by Harold D. Stolovitch, Ph.D., CPT O O The Paradoxicall Gifted y ing alternatives on where to focus and how to coordinate diverse visions and actions. One study synthesized the paradox of the gifted as follows: • Quick learner: Impatient with others, bored by explanations. • Highly inquisitive: Endlessly probing, can divert attention or embarrass authority. • Internally motivated and driven: Strong-willed, resists external directions. exalted positions were often unable to internalize their successful accomplishments, despite the fact they were truly merited. The greater the ability and success, the more they suffered from an incapacity to accept their achievements were not “fraudulent.” She and others found this to be particularly prevalent among the most talented and successful. Additionally, in 2003, Dr. Martin Voracek from the University of Vienna Medical School released a study of 85 countries in which he demonstrated a significant, positive correlation between high intelligence and suicide rates. This aligns with the Terman study of genius that tracked more than ne might assume those with remarkable talents, once secured and well remunerated, would require minimal support and direction to perform compared to others with less lofty abilities. Dangerous assumption! While research on those identified as gifted contains abundant contradictions, several relatively stable findings provide us with useful information to help them perform in ways they and their organizations value. Foremost, gifted individuals often require more careful guidance and support — especially upon entry to a job — than their colleagues. That’s because, while they have the same basic needs as the rest, gifted employees can sometimes be vulnerable in ways that decrease accomplishments. For example, their ability to perceive a vast array of possibilities in novel circumstances can lead to distraction. Confusion and anxiety about which path to follow can result. Findings from a number of studies on the gifted include: • Uneven development. While strong in talent areas, they may be underdeveloped in social skills or time management. Gifted individuals often require more careful guidance and support — especially upon entry to a job — than their colleagues. About the author Harold D. Stolovitch, Ph.D., is a principal of HSA Learning & Performance Solutions LLC and is an emeritus professor of instructional and performance technology at the Université de Montréal. He can be reached at editor@TalentMgt.com. • Creative problem solver: Resists grounded precedents. • Strong conceptualizer: Rejects or is intolerant of unclear, illogical situations that nevertheless exist. • High self expectations: Intolerant of self and/or others. • Focus on successful accomplishment: Neglectful of people and feelings. • Independent: Rejects authority. Drawing gifted talent into an organization is a desirable action; it’s also a challenge to prepare both the gifted individuals and their environment to obtain hoped-for performance. In 1985, Pauline Clance came out with an insightful book: The Imposter Phenomenon: Overcoming the Fear That Haunts Your Success. In it she documented how highly successful academics, businesspeople and even those in not necessarily • Self-criticism. They create idealistic, inflated images of what their jobs require and then internally punish themselves for not meeting self-imposed expectations. • Perfectionism. They set such high standards of performance they may expend enormous energy to achieve perfection, neglecting other important tasks, taking too much time to perform or becoming discouraged or paralyzed by imperfect results. • Risk avoidance. Foreseeing many potential obstacles, they might hesitate to take on initiatives for fear of underachievement or failure. • Multi-potentiality. If they possess several powerful talents, they may wrestle with compet- 1,500 gifted Californian children born between 1920-21 to find their suicide rate is three times higher than the U.S. national average. Giftedness, as defined by the U.S. Department of Education, is the possession of outstanding abilities and great potential for high performance. In the world of work, the capacity for innovation and superior performance is a strongly soughtafter commodity. Yet the buyer should beware. Once acquired, the talents of the gifted must be carefully supported and managed. Only by monitoring and attending to the vulnerabilities and paradoxes of these extraordinary individuals can organizations transform what might be great potential into remarkable performance. 12 March 2008 talent management magazine www.TalentMgt.com http://www.TalentMgt.com
Table of Contents Feed for the Digital Edition of TM - March 2008 TM - March 2008 Editor's Letter Contents Human Performance - The Paradoxically Gifted Leading Edge - Reverse Engineering: Shifting Focus to HR's Cause Learning Connection - Sharing Talent On the Hunt for Talent Unlock Employee Motivation Through Personality Testing HR Crucial to Executive Compensation Process Downtown Management: Surfing May Not Be Slacking Think Tanks Aid Government in Talent Management Creating Consistency: Enterprise-Wide Succession Plans Battle Retention Deficits With On-Boarding Sunbelt Rentals: A Mid-Level View of HR From the Trenches Butterball: No Chicken When It Comes to Talent Management Advertisers' Index Editorial Resources Full Potential - Choosing Change TM - March 2008 TM - March 2008 - (Page Intro) TM - March 2008 - TM - March 2008 (Page Cover1) TM - March 2008 - TM - March 2008 (Page Cover2) TM - March 2008 - TM - March 2008 (Page 3) TM - March 2008 - Editor's Letter (Page 4) TM - March 2008 - Editor's Letter (Page 5) TM - March 2008 - Editor's Letter (Page 6) TM - March 2008 - Editor's Letter (Page 7) TM - March 2008 - Editor's Letter (Page 8) TM - March 2008 - Contents (Page 9) TM - March 2008 - Contents (Page 10) TM - March 2008 - Contents (Page 11) TM - March 2008 - Human Performance - The Paradoxically Gifted (Page 12) TM - March 2008 - Human Performance - The Paradoxically Gifted (Page 13) TM - March 2008 - Leading Edge - Reverse Engineering: Shifting Focus to HR's Cause (Page 14) TM - March 2008 - Leading Edge - Reverse Engineering: Shifting Focus to HR's Cause (Page 15) TM - March 2008 - Learning Connection - Sharing Talent (Page 16) TM - March 2008 - Learning Connection - Sharing Talent (Page 17) TM - March 2008 - Learning Connection - Sharing Talent (Page 18) TM - March 2008 - Learning Connection - Sharing Talent (Page 19) TM - March 2008 - On the Hunt for Talent (Page 20) TM - March 2008 - On the Hunt for Talent (Page 21) TM - March 2008 - On the Hunt for Talent (Page 22) TM - March 2008 - On the Hunt for Talent (Page 23) TM - March 2008 - On the Hunt for Talent (Page 24) TM - March 2008 - On the Hunt for Talent (Page 25) TM - March 2008 - On the Hunt for Talent (Page 26) TM - March 2008 - On the Hunt for Talent (Page 27) TM - March 2008 - Unlock Employee Motivation Through Personality Testing (Page 28) TM - March 2008 - Unlock Employee Motivation Through Personality Testing (Page 29) TM - March 2008 - Unlock Employee Motivation Through Personality Testing (Page 30) TM - March 2008 - Unlock Employee Motivation Through Personality Testing (Page 31) TM - March 2008 - Unlock Employee Motivation Through Personality Testing (Page 32) TM - March 2008 - Unlock Employee Motivation Through Personality Testing (Page 33) TM - March 2008 - HR Crucial to Executive Compensation Process (Page 34) TM - March 2008 - HR Crucial to Executive Compensation Process (Page 35) TM - March 2008 - HR Crucial to Executive Compensation Process (Page 36) TM - March 2008 - HR Crucial to Executive Compensation Process (Page 37) TM - March 2008 - Downtown Management: Surfing May Not Be Slacking (Page 38) TM - March 2008 - Downtown Management: Surfing May Not Be Slacking (Page 39) TM - March 2008 - Downtown Management: Surfing May Not Be Slacking (Page 40) TM - March 2008 - Downtown Management: Surfing May Not Be Slacking (Page 41) TM - March 2008 - Think Tanks Aid Government in Talent Management (Page 42) TM - March 2008 - Think Tanks Aid Government in Talent Management (Page 43) TM - March 2008 - Creating Consistency: Enterprise-Wide Succession Plans (Page 44) TM - March 2008 - Creating Consistency: Enterprise-Wide Succession Plans (Page 45) TM - March 2008 - Creating Consistency: Enterprise-Wide Succession Plans (Page 46) TM - March 2008 - Creating Consistency: Enterprise-Wide Succession Plans (Page 47) TM - March 2008 - Battle Retention Deficits With On-Boarding (Page 48) TM - March 2008 - Battle Retention Deficits With On-Boarding (Page 49) TM - March 2008 - Battle Retention Deficits With On-Boarding (Page 50) TM - March 2008 - Battle Retention Deficits With On-Boarding (Page 51) TM - March 2008 - Sunbelt Rentals: A Mid-Level View of HR From the Trenches (Page 52) TM - March 2008 - Sunbelt Rentals: A Mid-Level View of HR From the Trenches (Page 53) TM - March 2008 - Butterball: No Chicken When It Comes to Talent Management (Page 54) TM - March 2008 - Butterball: No Chicken When It Comes to Talent Management (Page 55) TM - March 2008 - Butterball: No Chicken When It Comes to Talent Management (Page 56) TM - March 2008 - Editorial Resources (Page 57) TM - March 2008 - Full Potential - Choosing Change (Page 58) TM - March 2008 - Full Potential - Choosing Change (Page Cover3) TM - March 2008 - Full Potential - Choosing Change (Page Cover4)
For optimal viewing of this digital publication, please enable JavaScript and then refresh the page. If you would like to try to load the digital publication without using Flash Player detection, please click here.