TM - March 2008 - (Page 45)

For example, research done on CEO succession by the Hay Group showed hiring externally can result in shorter employment terms, less stable company culture and morale and compensation-related costs, as organizations often have to bump up pay to attract external hires. The cost of recruiting new talent also is a factor, regardless of organizational level. “The financial repercussions — and forget about the downtime of making a bad decision on the placement, in terms of lost business opportunity — just looking at the replacement costs, are significant,” said Ron Garonzik, vice president of leadership talent at the Hay Group in New York. “Internal candidates are more likely to succeed because organizations that have figured it out have time to develop the candidates and to address the risks that they pose in relation to critical positions.” To help lessen the extent of external hiring in the future, the NGHS has since begun to implement an enterprise-wide succession planning strategy whereby each employee identifies three potential in-house successors, estimates how long it would take those successors to work into the positions and then helps create specific development plans for them. “We just can’t afford to have the inconsistency and the silos that existed in the past,” Fulbright said. Succession as Business Strategy highlight the fundamental connection between succession planning and key business goals around development and retention. “Succession planning isn’t this stand-alone thing,” said Kevin Martin at Aberdeen. “It’s something that feeds recruiting, performance management, learning and development.” For this reason, the first step in creating a successful succession plan is to think of it as a fundamental element of a dynamic business strategy. The plan should not only identify potential gaps within the organization, it should explicitly define current and future job roles. “First and foremost, succession is about ensuring your business has the organizational capability in place to prosper,” Garonzik said. “That means looking at the business context and strategy very carefully and understanding in terms of strategic requirements what the operating model needs will be going forward. How is the organization going to run to generate the revenue it requires?” To fill these well-defined job roles requires a high level of openness and transparency within the organization. “You have to know how the organization is going to grow and be really clear on what people need to know and need to be able to do to be successful in that future state,” Ringler said. “And that’s not just hard skills. It’s how people like to work, what motivates them. It’s, ‘Do they want to be a part of the organization’s growth?’” March 2008 The push to promote from within also has helped talent management magazine www.TalentMgt.com 45 http://www.TalentMgt.com

Table of Contents Feed for the Digital Edition of TM - March 2008

TM - March 2008 Editor's Letter Contents Human Performance - The Paradoxically Gifted Leading Edge - Reverse Engineering: Shifting Focus to HR's Cause Learning Connection - Sharing Talent On the Hunt for Talent Unlock Employee Motivation Through Personality Testing HR Crucial to Executive Compensation Process Downtown Management: Surfing May Not Be Slacking Think Tanks Aid Government in Talent Management Creating Consistency: Enterprise-Wide Succession Plans Battle Retention Deficits With On-Boarding Sunbelt Rentals: A Mid-Level View of HR From the Trenches Butterball: No Chicken When It Comes to Talent Management Advertisers' Index Editorial Resources Full Potential - Choosing Change

TM - March 2008

For optimal viewing of this digital publication, please enable JavaScript and then refresh the page. If you would like to try to load the digital publication without using Flash Player detection, please click here.