TM - March 2008 - (Page 46) recruitment & retention assessment & evaluation compensation & benefits performance management learning & development succession planning Three Key Steps to Create Succession Planning Consistency Doris Sims As more corporations update their talent management strategies, consistency in the identification, reporting and development of key talent and successors are important to: • Create a solid leadership competency across the organization with a common emphasis on the values and skills needed to meet the company’s specific business and customer needs. • Protect the company by creating a fair and legally defensible talent assessment process. • Easily move high potentials and successors across various divisions of the company and prevent the Key No. 1: Leadership and Organizational Structure problem of “this person was a high potential in Australia — what happened to her when she moved to Europe?” • Develop a talent pipeline across all business units, cities and countries, rather than having pockets of talent in some areas and talent gaps in others. Creating enterprise-wide consistency can be a challenge, especially when considering different cultures and geographic areas. The keys to creating a successful strategy are the people who lead the process and structure; the tools, documentation and procedures used to execute the plans; and executive support for dependable program participation and accountability. Key No. 3: Executive Support and Participation Key No. 2: A Consistent Leadership Competency Model, Definitions and Tools Talent and organizational development practitioners must lead the strategy and processes in each section of the organization, whether divided by geographic region or by business unit. Some companies view their talent management personnel as part of their external recruiting initiative, while others see them as part of their training and development program. No best practice has yet emerged on the organizational placement of talent and succession planning employees, but an ideal talent management organizational structure should include sectional HR professionals who report to both a business leader and a senior leader or executive who has internal talent responsibility for the entire organization. Ideally, this leader is specifically devoted to talent management — rather than a general HR executive — and is responsible for all internal talent management initiatives. If talent management professionals report only to the business unit, rather than a matrix or direct line to a global talent leader, consistency across the organization will be difficult to achieve. Organizations that successfully create consistency in their talent management processes must first develop and communicate what an effective leader looks like in their organizations and how this effective leader can be identified and developed. A worldwide leadership competency model can help, especially when the model is used in conjunction with rating systems or as part of a nine-box talent assessment chart. Use the same definitions of successors and high potentials throughout the organization, throughout the year. The global talent management team, working with business leaders, must agree on what they are looking for in a high-potential leader to be successful in identifying him or her. Further, use consistent methods and content for talent documentation, reporting and metrics. Provide templates and/or an online succession planning system to ensure all talent management professionals and business leaders are documenting the same type of information for key talent in the organization. Finally, communicate the enterprise-wide metrics that all talent management practitioners will be responsible for providing, and hold everyone accountable for producing the required data. Required presentations to executive leaders help hold HR and business leaders accountable for following a consistent and valuable talent management process. When the organization’s top executives lead and communicate the succession planning strategy, it is integrated into and prioritized with other top business goals in the company. When executives participate in the process, hold their direct reports accountable for talent identification and skill development and hold themselves accountable for reporting succession planning information to the board, this creates an ideal foundation for the corporate succession planning strategy. This level of consistency in talent and succession management typically takes several years to develop, and most organizations continue to work on all of these consistency keys on an ongoing basis. Doris Sims, SPHR, is co-founder of Building Tomorrow’s Talent LLC, a Texas-based talent management and succession planning consulting firm. She can be reached at editor@TalentMgt.com. 46 talent management magazine www.TalentMgt.com http://www.TalentMgt.com
Table of Contents Feed for the Digital Edition of TM - March 2008 TM - March 2008 Editor's Letter Contents Human Performance - The Paradoxically Gifted Leading Edge - Reverse Engineering: Shifting Focus to HR's Cause Learning Connection - Sharing Talent On the Hunt for Talent Unlock Employee Motivation Through Personality Testing HR Crucial to Executive Compensation Process Downtown Management: Surfing May Not Be Slacking Think Tanks Aid Government in Talent Management Creating Consistency: Enterprise-Wide Succession Plans Battle Retention Deficits With On-Boarding Sunbelt Rentals: A Mid-Level View of HR From the Trenches Butterball: No Chicken When It Comes to Talent Management Advertisers' Index Editorial Resources Full Potential - Choosing Change TM - March 2008 TM - March 2008 - (Page Intro) TM - March 2008 - TM - March 2008 (Page Cover1) TM - March 2008 - TM - March 2008 (Page Cover2) TM - March 2008 - TM - March 2008 (Page 3) TM - March 2008 - Editor's Letter (Page 4) TM - March 2008 - Editor's Letter (Page 5) TM - March 2008 - Editor's Letter (Page 6) TM - March 2008 - Editor's Letter (Page 7) TM - March 2008 - Editor's Letter (Page 8) TM - March 2008 - Contents (Page 9) TM - March 2008 - Contents (Page 10) TM - March 2008 - Contents (Page 11) TM - March 2008 - Human Performance - The Paradoxically Gifted (Page 12) TM - March 2008 - Human Performance - The Paradoxically Gifted (Page 13) TM - March 2008 - Leading Edge - Reverse Engineering: Shifting Focus to HR's Cause (Page 14) TM - March 2008 - Leading Edge - Reverse Engineering: Shifting Focus to HR's Cause (Page 15) TM - March 2008 - Learning Connection - Sharing Talent (Page 16) TM - March 2008 - Learning Connection - Sharing Talent (Page 17) TM - March 2008 - Learning Connection - Sharing Talent (Page 18) TM - March 2008 - Learning Connection - Sharing Talent (Page 19) TM - March 2008 - On the Hunt for Talent (Page 20) TM - March 2008 - On the Hunt for Talent (Page 21) TM - March 2008 - On the Hunt for Talent (Page 22) TM - March 2008 - On the Hunt for Talent (Page 23) TM - March 2008 - On the Hunt for Talent (Page 24) TM - March 2008 - On the Hunt for Talent (Page 25) TM - March 2008 - On the Hunt for Talent (Page 26) TM - March 2008 - On the Hunt for Talent (Page 27) TM - March 2008 - Unlock Employee Motivation Through Personality Testing (Page 28) TM - March 2008 - Unlock Employee Motivation Through Personality Testing (Page 29) TM - March 2008 - Unlock Employee Motivation Through Personality Testing (Page 30) TM - March 2008 - Unlock Employee Motivation Through Personality Testing (Page 31) TM - March 2008 - Unlock Employee Motivation Through Personality Testing (Page 32) TM - March 2008 - Unlock Employee Motivation Through Personality Testing (Page 33) TM - March 2008 - HR Crucial to Executive Compensation Process (Page 34) TM - March 2008 - HR Crucial to Executive Compensation Process (Page 35) TM - March 2008 - HR Crucial to Executive Compensation Process (Page 36) TM - March 2008 - HR Crucial to Executive Compensation Process (Page 37) TM - March 2008 - Downtown Management: Surfing May Not Be Slacking (Page 38) TM - March 2008 - Downtown Management: Surfing May Not Be Slacking (Page 39) TM - March 2008 - Downtown Management: Surfing May Not Be Slacking (Page 40) TM - March 2008 - Downtown Management: Surfing May Not Be Slacking (Page 41) TM - March 2008 - Think Tanks Aid Government in Talent Management (Page 42) TM - March 2008 - Think Tanks Aid Government in Talent Management (Page 43) TM - March 2008 - Creating Consistency: Enterprise-Wide Succession Plans (Page 44) TM - March 2008 - Creating Consistency: Enterprise-Wide Succession Plans (Page 45) TM - March 2008 - Creating Consistency: Enterprise-Wide Succession Plans (Page 46) TM - March 2008 - Creating Consistency: Enterprise-Wide Succession Plans (Page 47) TM - March 2008 - Battle Retention Deficits With On-Boarding (Page 48) TM - March 2008 - Battle Retention Deficits With On-Boarding (Page 49) TM - March 2008 - Battle Retention Deficits With On-Boarding (Page 50) TM - March 2008 - Battle Retention Deficits With On-Boarding (Page 51) TM - March 2008 - Sunbelt Rentals: A Mid-Level View of HR From the Trenches (Page 52) TM - March 2008 - Sunbelt Rentals: A Mid-Level View of HR From the Trenches (Page 53) TM - March 2008 - Butterball: No Chicken When It Comes to Talent Management (Page 54) TM - March 2008 - Butterball: No Chicken When It Comes to Talent Management (Page 55) TM - March 2008 - Butterball: No Chicken When It Comes to Talent Management (Page 56) TM - March 2008 - Editorial Resources (Page 57) TM - March 2008 - Full Potential - Choosing Change (Page 58) TM - March 2008 - Full Potential - Choosing Change (Page Cover3) TM - March 2008 - Full Potential - Choosing Change (Page Cover4)
For optimal viewing of this digital publication, please enable JavaScript and then refresh the page. If you would like to try to load the digital publication without using Flash Player detection, please click here.